Discussion Board
Cheesey
2021-02-15T17:06:51Z
Originally Posted by: all_about_da_packers 

You... you do realize what your (and WPR's) pipe dream is actually runs contrary to free-market enterprise, right? In other words, you realize what you (both) propose doesn't align with the values of capitalism that have made America the land of opportunity and American citizenship desired by so many across the globe, right?

I had to do a double take to make sure "Comrade" wasn't in front of Cheesey.



Do you know that there are limits to what a lawyer can charge in a personal injury case? They are limited to charging one third of the settlement, and can’t charge if they lose the case.
Is that killing the lawyers?
Nope.
So there are limits in other professions, so why not people that are getting paid ridiculous money to play a game?
Football has been around for a hundred years, and survived up to now. And past players didn’t get millions of dollars to play.
I know there are millions of fans that would LOVE to see a game live, but the insane prices to do so make it impossible to afford.
And like I said, it’s just a pipe dream. I don’t expect it to actually happen.
I didn’t know that that would make me a communist. To wish that greed wouldn’t keep the average fan from enjoying seeing a football game live.

I think you took it to the extreme so you could make a dig at me.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2021-02-15T18:37:48Z
Originally Posted by: Cheesey 

Do you know that there are limits to what a lawyer can charge in a personal injury case? They are limited to charging one third of the settlement, and can’t charge if they lose the case.
Is that killing the lawyers?
Nope.
So there are limits in other professions, so why not people that are getting paid ridiculous money to play a game?
Football has been around for a hundred years, and survived up to now. And past players didn’t get millions of dollars to play.
I know there are millions of fans that would LOVE to see a game live, but the insane prices to do so make it impossible to afford.
And like I said, it’s just a pipe dream. I don’t expect it to actually happen.
I didn’t know that that would make me a communist. To wish that greed wouldn’t keep the average fan from enjoying seeing a football game live.

I think you took it to the extreme so you could make a dig at me.



When people make a perceived "dig" at someone it is because they do not understand how to otherwise express themselves. I wouldn't worry about it.

I also don't think restricting the amount a player can earn helps anything at all. As I outlined in a previous post in hopes that you would focus on the topic at hand instead of the "dig" -- I mentioned several of the pros and cons. What's more important in your mind to discuss? What I outlined on this subject or responding to someone who doesn't otherwise know how to express themselves without taking shots at someone? 🤷‍♂️ The choice is yours.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
2021-02-15T20:04:28Z
Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

When people make a perceived "dig" at someone it is because they do not understand how to otherwise express themselves. I wouldn't worry about it.

I also don't think restricting the amount a player can earn helps anything at all. As I outlined in a previous post in hopes that you would focus on the topic at hand instead of the "dig" -- I mentioned several of the pros and cons. What's more important in your mind to discuss? What I outlined on this subject or responding to someone who doesn't otherwise know how to express themselves without taking shots at someone? 🤷‍♂️ The choice is yours.



I don’t know.....I have seen times when you have got pissed off when someone makes a “dig” at you.
If someone isn’t adult enough, or allows their dislike of someone to call them terrible names, like calling them a communist, should it just be ignored? Making them THINK they are so smart and correct in what they say? I think they should be called out for it.

Ignoring bad behavior is just as bad as agreeing with it.

🤷‍♂️
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2021-02-15T20:16:35Z
Originally Posted by: Cheesey 

I don’t know.....I have seen times when you have got pissed off when someone makes a “dig” at you.
If someone isn’t adult enough, or allows their dislike of someone to call them terrible names, like calling them a communist, should it just be ignored? Making them THINK they are so smart and correct in what they say? I think they should be called out for it.

Ignoring bad behavior is just as bad as agreeing with it.

🤷‍♂️



There is a book called the Holy Bible. Check out Matthew 5:39. 😋

Time is one thing none of us can recover or buy. We all should move on instead of worrying about calling someone out. My daughter does this every chance she gets. It makes me not want to talk to her. Who wants to be "called out" because their opinion is different? Why can't people just converse and accept others differences for just that? Why can't we talk the NFL Salary Cap for 2021 without people interpreting something ignorantly worded into a "dig" and then having to completely derail one of the few tangible topics to discuss until draft? It's frustrating that we cannot just stop feeding the asshole-ignorant-dumb-fuck-trolls.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
2021-02-16T02:16:08Z
The heck with it.
Tomorrow is my twelfth anniversary of my open heart surgery.
I’ve been having chest pain. But there’s no way I’m going through that again.
I’m tired.
UserPostedImage
beast
2021-02-16T08:32:23Z
Actually the NFL is partly great because of their cap limits which gives teams a more equal playing field, unlike other sports, where it's often the same ole teams once again. Which yeah, happens in NFL, but to a lesser degree.

And the Players already have a maximum limit, it's called the salary cap.

And while players are over paid for playing a game, I say owners are especially overpaid for pretending they know a damn thing about football, especially the ones that control the draft and/or FAs.


UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2021-02-16T12:45:52Z
Originally Posted by: beast 

Actually the NFL is partly great because of their cap limits which gives teams a more equal playing field, unlike other sports, where it's often the same ole teams once again. Which yeah, happens in NFL, but to a lesser degree.

And the Players already have a maximum limit, it's called the salary cap.

And while players are over paid for playing a game, I say owners are especially overpaid for pretending they know a damn thing about football, especially the ones that control the draft and/or FAs.


I think we all are in agreement the NFL Salary Cap for a Team is good. As for the Players having a maximum limit, they really don't because a dumb ass owner/general manager can skew one position with one really bonehead contract. That four year $72 million contract was used as leverage for other QB's. The players receive 48% the NFL revenue. I wonder if the CBA allows the owners to tilt that in favor of the players for 2021 to reduce the salary cap drop off? I think there are some long term issues that will creep up if a dozen teams have to whack a lot of really good players. Hell, maybe that creates more parity though? 🤷‍♂️

All I know -- glad I ain't gotta figure this crap out.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 

The heck with it.
Tomorrow is my twelfth anniversary of my open heart surgery.
I’ve been having chest pain. But there’s no way I’m going through that again.
I’m tired.


Just know --- if you end up having to go through it again ... you are not alone.


UserPostedImage
Cheesey
2021-02-16T19:35:47Z
all_about_da_packers
2021-02-17T06:44:51Z
Originally Posted by: Cheesey 

Do you know that there are limits to what a lawyer can charge in a personal injury case? They are limited to charging one third of the settlement, and can’t charge if they lose the case.
Is that killing the lawyers?
Nope.
So there are limits in other professions, so why not people that are getting paid ridiculous money to play a game?
Football has been around for a hundred years, and survived up to now. And past players didn’t get millions of dollars to play.
I know there are millions of fans that would LOVE to see a game live, but the insane prices to do so make it impossible to afford.
And like I said, it’s just a pipe dream. I don’t expect it to actually happen.
I didn’t know that that would make me a communist. To wish that greed wouldn’t keep the average fan from enjoying seeing a football game live.

I think you took it to the extreme so you could make a dig at me.



My intention wasn't to take a dig at you, but I did want to challenge a prominent idea that came across in your (and WPR's) post. I'll get to that in a sec; but point taken that I could've phrased the post better to challenge that idea more directly.

Regarding limits on lawyers - it's not something I've ever heard of before. A few clarifications may be needed, because what you talk about regarding an attorney's ability to charge:
1. Attorney's charge fix fee (or percentage) or hourly, but I'm sure you aren't explaining the limits on a lawyer's earning power correctly. For example, a settlement involves no winners or losers - it is a resolution that is founded on compromise. A lawyer can't be limited to not charging for a settlement if they lose because, by definition, there are no losers in settlements. Not to sound like I'm dragging you, because even I still get mixed up navigating the legal system - it is complex. My point is that I've heard of limits for PI lawyers on settlements, but that doesn't limit how such a lawyer can earn from their profession because a PI lawyer's earning/revenue streams can be so diverse (e.g., referral fees for client referrals, fee from being a mediator, being an arbitrator, and (most lucrative of all) fees from taking case to court and arguing in front of a judge). That's even before a PI lawyer that is part of a law firm gets to share in the profits of the law firm they are at (which routinely results in significant bonus payouts). A limit on settlements does not altogether limit how much a lawyer earns from their profession.

2. Lawyers are different than players. You wouldn't hire players to act for your benefit/best interest. You hire lawyers to do only such; lawyers are obligated under rules of their profession to put your interests first, and have a duty to advocate for your best interests (and place your interests above their own in the lawyer-client relationship context). To that end, it can be argued that limits on a lawyer's ability to charge for a particular service they offer you should not be seen as a limit on lawyer's earning ability. Rather, it (i.e., limit of charging 1/3 the settlement figure) is a mechanism to ensure a lawyer is acting within the moral and legal scope of his obligations to you as his/her client - namely, they are not benefiting improperly at your expense. I know for a fact that it is so, so easy for lawyers to bill in a way that you won't see it coming. I've seen cases in the personal injury context where, even before a conference begins between the parties, a lawyer has charged his/her client many thousand dollars before speaking or saying anything. In other words, limits of what lawyers are allowed to charge for settlements from their clients who, usually, are vulnerable (i.e., you usually get a lawyer at one of the toughest/lowest points in your life), not as savvy (i.e., clever in "masking" charges or reading legal bills), and to whom lawyers have legal (and moral) obligations of elevating their interest... I think it is entirely a different context than football players playing for the entertainment of others, to whom they owe no legal (or moral) obligations.

Which brings me back to the idea I wanted to challenge: I'm quite dumbfounded whenever I see people complain/wish football players made less. Why? These are very often football players who're from poor means (whether rural or urban), who've spent the bulk of their lives assuming risk of injury while training/playing for nothing in return until they get to the NFL. All the more power to them for cashing in every penny they can once they get to the NFL. I'm not sure what it is about people in society generally poo-pooing others getting a boatload of green paper after chasing it for so long.

I'm being serious about what I said regarding free markets; no other economic system in recorded history has produced wealth to the rate we're seeing today (which, to be clear, is not to say the system is flawed and can be tweaked to improve). You, I and NFL players only have our labor to sell in exchange for money - we can use it to make products, offer services or provide entertainment for consumption in exchange for making an earning. If an NFL player gets a multi-million dollar contract, all the more power to them; good on them for capitalizing in the way many people only ever dream of. Capping salaries is not going to reduce ticket prices (I note the money the NFL receives from selling its broadcast rights is enough to cover the vast, vast majority of player salaries without ticket/gate revenue).

I'm not sure why NFL players should be held to a standard (i.e., put a limit on how much they earn) when that is not something many of us would support in other scenarios (e.g., CEO salaries, teacher salaries, serving members in the military). I'm all for people chasing their dreams and cashing in (legally) to the most of their ability once they are in a position to do so. If it leads to 9-figure incomes - cool! All the more power to them, as they are receiving a return on their product/service/performance for entertainment that the market has deemed to be a fair exchange/return for what such players are offering. And it's neat seeing so many NFL players who grew up on farms, or lived such tough lives in poor neighborhoods strike it big, and become financial engines for their family, friends, and loved ones - and work to give them (and themselves) a comfortable life.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
Cheesey
2021-02-17T12:18:23Z
Originally Posted by: all_about_da_packers 

My intention wasn't to take a dig at you, but I did want to challenge a prominent idea that came across in your (and WPR's) post. I'll get to that in a sec; but point taken that I could've phrased the post better to challenge that idea more directly.

Regarding limits on lawyers - it's not something I've ever heard of before. A few clarifications may be needed, because what you talk about regarding an attorney's ability to charge:
1. Attorney's charge fix fee (or percentage) or hourly, but I'm sure you aren't explaining the limits on a lawyer's earning power correctly. For example, a settlement involves no winners or losers - it is a resolution that is founded on compromise. A lawyer can't be limited to not charging for a settlement if they lose because, by definition, there are no losers in settlements. Not to sound like I'm dragging you, because even I still get mixed up navigating the legal system - it is complex. My point is that I've heard of limits for PI lawyers on settlements, but that doesn't limit how such a lawyer can earn from their profession because a PI lawyer's earning/revenue streams can be so diverse (e.g., referral fees for client referrals, fee from being a mediator, being an arbitrator, and (most lucrative of all) fees from taking case to court and arguing in front of a judge). That's even before a PI lawyer that is part of a law firm gets to share in the profits of the law firm they are at (which routinely results in significant bonus payouts). A limit on settlements does not altogether limit how much a lawyer earns from their profession.

2. Lawyers are different than players. You wouldn't hire players to act for your benefit/best interest. You hire lawyers to do only such; lawyers are obligated under rules of their profession to put your interests first, and have a duty to advocate for your best interests (and place your interests above their own in the lawyer-client relationship context). To that end, it can be argued that limits on a lawyer's ability to charge for a particular service they offer you should not be seen as a limit on lawyer's earning ability. Rather, it (i.e., limit of charging 1/3 the settlement figure) is a mechanism to ensure a lawyer is acting within the moral and legal scope of his obligations to you as his/her client - namely, they are not benefiting improperly at your expense. I know for a fact that it is so, so easy for lawyers to bill in a way that you won't see it coming. I've seen cases in the personal injury context where, even before a conference begins between the parties, a lawyer has charged his/her client many thousand dollars before speaking or saying anything. In other words, limits of what lawyers are allowed to charge for settlements from their clients who, usually, are vulnerable (i.e., you usually get a lawyer at one of the toughest/lowest points in your life), not as savvy (i.e., clever in "masking" charges or reading legal bills), and to whom lawyers have legal (and moral) obligations of elevating their interest... I think it is entirely a different context than football players playing for the entertainment of others, to whom they owe no legal (or moral) obligations.

Which brings me back to the idea I wanted to challenge: I'm quite dumbfounded whenever I see people complain/wish football players made less. Why? These are very often football players who're from poor means (whether rural or urban), who've spent the bulk of their lives assuming risk of injury while training/playing for nothing in return until they get to the NFL. All the more power to them for cashing in every penny they can once they get to the NFL. I'm not sure what it is about people in society generally poo-pooing others getting a boatload of green paper after chasing it for so long.

I'm being serious about what I said regarding free markets; no other economic system in recorded history has produced wealth to the rate we're seeing today (which, to be clear, is not to say the system is flawed and can be tweaked to improve). You, I and NFL players only have our labor to sell in exchange for money - we can use it to make products, offer services or provide entertainment for consumption in exchange for making an earning. If an NFL player gets a multi-million dollar contract, all the more power to them; good on them for capitalizing in the way many people only ever dream of. Capping salaries is not going to reduce ticket prices (I note the money the NFL receives from selling its broadcast rights is enough to cover the vast, vast majority of player salaries without ticket/gate revenue).

I'm not sure why NFL players should be held to a standard (i.e., put a limit on how much they earn) when that is not something many of us would support in other scenarios (e.g., CEO salaries, teacher salaries, serving members in the military). I'm all for people chasing their dreams and cashing in (legally) to the most of their ability once they are in a position to do so. If it leads to 9-figure incomes - cool! All the more power to them, as they are receiving a return on their product/service/performance for entertainment that the market has deemed to be a fair exchange/return for what such players are offering. And it's neat seeing so many NFL players who grew up on farms, or lived such tough lives in poor neighborhoods strike it big, and become financial engines for their family, friends, and loved ones - and work to give them (and themselves) a comfortable life.



I get what you are saying.
I wish CEOs would be given salary limits too. Most of them make way too much money, while the real workers can’t get a decent wage. Who pays for it? Us.
As far as players taking chances on injuries, people like the police and front line health care workers put their lives and health on the line every day. Cops get killed all the time by criminals. Fire fighters actually put their lives on the line too. And they have to do their dangerous jobs for decades. How many football players get killed in the line of duty each year? Yet these workers don’t make in their entire careers what a player makes in a year.
And after a player retires, they can get “real” jobs if they want. Many have come from poor means, but are college graduates that, if they haven’t pissed away their earnings from football, are most likely set for life.
I’m not against the free market. And as I said, what I stated was just a “wish list”, not realistic. I just wish things could be more equal. There are real heroes out there that to me deserve more then what they get as compared to people playing a game.
I know it will never happen.
And it’s probably good it won’t happen. Maybe some day these athletes will price themselves out of existence if it’s not reined in. They might end up killing the “golden goose”.


UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2021-02-17T13:56:26Z
I don't think the amount of money one earns is a problem at all. The more I think about this, the more I think we have a glorifying problem. Remember that deplorable show MTV Cribs? They go around showing off people's homes. This brought upon competition to have a better house, or houses. If players salaries were not made public, even to each other, would we be in this "must be highest paid" rampage? No. Sports are so different than the common business with this regard. Every job and every career path I've taken has had some requirement that your salary is not disclosed. When I worked for dish network I was told I couldn't receive a raise, although I more than anyone else earned it. The reason was I had already been earning a quarter more than the highest paid supervisor and I hit the ceiling. Mind you, working in a contact center being the customer service trainer and sales manager is nothing to brag about. It's basically the tallest midget. I showed up everyday, worked overtime and knew the systems in an out.

The point I'm getting at is salaries shouldn't be disclosed. I know it's probably impossible in sports because of the salary cap and how easily it would be owners for fook a player over. If they did go with a non disclosure of salary, I think it would be amazing for the NFL and equal the markets regardless of size. The caveat that I would request on the players behalf is that all players receive a decade pension for each year of NFL service up to life. Obviously, players like Tom Brady won't live for another 200 years, so the pension would go up to death. This way players are provided for and I think more people would try to get into the NFL.

I know it's just a pipe dream. The ripple effect would be incredible. A player getting $100,000 a year for pension would massively help the economy too. They could go back to school, finish their degree that the scholarship provided or even pay for it themselves.

Then again, I'm also someone who feels every single person should have go into the military for 1-2 years post High School.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
2021-02-18T01:24:25Z
“Glorifying problem”.....you hit the nail in the head with that one.
Why do people glorify teens that get on TV because they get pregnant? Or trashy people from “The Jersey Shores”?
Or housewives from various cities?
So called “reality shows” that are classless.
Sorry for going off on a tangent.....I couldn’t help myself!!!🤪
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2021-02-18T14:14:38Z
The NFL in a memo to teams has said the salary cap floor has been increased from $175 million to $180 million after talks with the NFLPA.

They are already bumping the worst-case scenario cash for the salary cap. This makes me believe the salary cap is going to be hovering around $200 million.

If the Owners want to look like "good guys", they could chip in a few percent of their revenue share towards the players and look like freaking heroes -- for two minutes.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
2021-02-18T14:30:14Z
Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

The NFL in a memo to teams has said the salary cap floor has been increased from $175 million to $180 million after talks with the NFLPA.

They are already bumping the worst-case scenario cash for the salary cap. This makes me believe the salary cap is going to be hovering around $200 million.

If the Owners want to look like "good guys", they could chip in a few percent of their revenue share towards the players and look like freaking heroes -- for two minutes.


Does a “measly” 5 million dollars make that much difference?
Especially for teams that are already way over the cap?
We are about to lose some of our best players because of the cap drop.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2021-02-18T15:02:42Z
Originally Posted by: Cheesey 

Does a “measly” 5 million dollars make that much difference?
Especially for teams that are already way over the cap?
We are about to lose some of our best players because of the cap drop.



We are not going to lose some of our best players because of the dip in salary cap. And yes, the $5 million is a huge difference. Players like Aaron Jones were going to be gone regardless. The Packers reportedly offered him a contract that was top five and he declined it. I really like Jones, but no RB is worth what he's going to get from like the Jaguars or something. How many RB's have we watched fail to achieve success with their new teams? A lot. Jones would be better served to sign a one year deal with attainable incentives and then cash in big on 2022 when that new TV money is more understood.

What players are you concerned with losing because of the salary cap drop? Aside from (I assume) Aaron Jones.
A good list can be found here. http://www.packershome.c...Green-Bay-Packers-Roster 

Allen Lazard (ERFA), Robert Tonyan (RFA), Raven Greene (RFA), Jamaal Williams I think will all be back in 2021. Corey Linsley being 30 years old is probably gonna just take the highest paid offer. Aaron Jones I think is going to be gone, but Williams is a year younger and will be cheaper anyway.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
2021-02-19T18:02:09Z
Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

We are not going to lose some of our best players because of the dip in salary cap. And yes, the $5 million is a huge difference. Players like Aaron Jones were going to be gone regardless. The Packers reportedly offered him a contract that was top five and he declined it. I really like Jones, but no RB is worth what he's going to get from like the Jaguars or something. How many RB's have we watched fail to achieve success with their new teams? A lot. Jones would be better served to sign a one year deal with attainable incentives and then cash in big on 2022 when that new TV money is more understood.

What players are you concerned with losing because of the salary cap drop? Aside from (I assume) Aaron Jones.
A good list can be found here. http://www.packershome.c...Green-Bay-Packers-Roster 

Allen Lazard (ERFA), Robert Tonyan (RFA), Raven Greene (RFA), Jamaal Williams I think will all be back in 2021. Corey Linsley being 30 years old is probably gonna just take the highest paid offer. Aaron Jones I think is going to be gone, but Williams is a year younger and will be cheaper anyway.



Mostly Jones, Linsley and Williams. I know we probably wouldn’t be able to afford them even if the cap wasn’t lowered.
It just frustrates me that you work hard to develope players, only to have them chase “the almighty dollar” first chance they get. I know it’s that way across the league. Not just “my” team.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
2021-02-19T19:58:02Z
Originally Posted by: Cheesey 

Mostly Jones, Linsley and Williams. I know we probably wouldn’t be able to afford them even if the cap wasn’t lowered.
It just frustrates me that you work hard to develope players, only to have them chase “the almighty dollar” first chance they get. I know it’s that way across the league. Not just “my” team.



I think this is a fascinating situation. Not only do we have COVID restricting the NFL revenue, we have new TV deals. ESPN's deal runs out in 2022. Fox, CBS and NBC end in 2023. I believe the NFL wants to finalize the new TV deals before confirming/setting the 2021 Salary Cap.

If I'm a player who is ascending, I sign a one year, maybe two year deal for 2021 knowing if I rock out I'll cash out in a lucrative long-term deal.
If I'm a player still in his prime, I'm doing a one year deal for 2021 knowing the ensuing years are going to be more financially fruitful.
If I'm a player in the decline, I sign in a manner that aligns with my priorities. If my priority is winning that elusive ring, I sign bargain deal.

A RB closing in on 30 years old -- I don't know what I would do. I'm someone who values winning and legacy over financial wealth so I would probably try for a three year guaranteed contract with the Packers. 2021 - $1 million, 2022 - $2 million and 2022 - $8 million.

Yes, taking the time to develop players and then them leaving after four years has to be a difficult. I don't think players leave the first chance they get and that's really being disingenuous to the plethora of players who re-sign lower offers than they could have had elsewhere. Just because the news doesn't plaster the selfless players does not mean they do not exist.

I do think Jamaal Williams will re-sign and probably be the Packers leading ball carrier in 2021 with AJ Dillon right behind him.
UserPostedImage
beast
2021-02-21T16:52:27Z
Sounds like the NFL believes they can lock up 100% raise in TV contracts revenue from most of the TV companies, except maybe ESPN and ABC which are owned by Disney.

If so, they should be able to easily level out the decline in cap, though would they dare level it out before the deals are completed?

I think it depends how close they are to getting the companies to sign them.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2021/02/20/nfl-reportedly-seeking-to-double-broadcast-rights-fees/ 
UserPostedImage
Users browsing this topic
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (22-Feb) : Not bad ---Alshon Jeffery expected to be released by Eagles once season starts
Zero2Cool (20-Feb) : @nflrums #Steelers expected to release CB Joe Haden saving the team 7M in cap space
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Sources say Wagner is contemplating retirement. The moves clear $10.25M in cap space.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : #Packers likely to part ways with Josh Jackson CB #Iowa #GreenBay #NFL
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Philadelphia has agreed to trade Carson Wentz to the Indianapolis Colts in exchange for a 2021 third-round pick and a conditional 2022 second-round pick that could turn into a first, league sources te
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : The NFL in a memo to teams has said the salary cap floor has been increased from $175 million to $180 million after talks with the NFLPA.
Zero2Cool (17-Feb) : Richard Sherman: It’s been made pretty clear I won’t return to 49ers
Zero2Cool (17-Feb) : Graziano: #Broncos are “likely” to decline Von Miller’s $18M team option. That would make him an unrestricted free agent.
Mucky Tundra (16-Feb) : Thems are fighting words down South Zero! Well, when the snow and ice melts and they run out of bread and milk
Zero2Cool (15-Feb) : WINTER STORM WARNING... Yes. Bring it biotches
Zero2Cool (14-Feb) : “Why go from $175 million for 2021 and then raise it to $220 million in 2022? That just doesn’t make any sense,” one NFL agent he said.
Zero2Cool (13-Feb) : @ProFootballTalk Report: Steelers, Browns, Titans, Bills have shown interest in J.J. Watt
Zero2Cool (12-Feb) : JJ Watt asks for and is released by Texans. I bet he joins his brother.
packerfanoutwest (12-Feb) : Isn't that the title Capers has in Detroit?
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Report: Mike Pettine joining Bears as senior defensive assistant
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : @MikeKlis Broncos are releasing CB A.J. Bouye per source. #9sports
Cheesey (10-Feb) : Yup, Mucky. Brady is “the chosen one”. He could knife a guy in the field, and they’d flag the other guy for bleeding!
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : Zero, I wonder if Wisconsin promised him the HC at some point in the future
Mucky Tundra (10-Feb) : yeah Cheesey,I love how Brady ran 10+ yards and bumps into Mathieu helmet first the refs do nothing but when Mathieu turns to walk away and just points at Brady they instantly flag him
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Oates: Leonhard "dang near took the job"
Zero2Cool (10-Feb) : Tell your friend registration is free. Register and ask.
packerfanoutwest (10-Feb) : Was the SB fixed? asking for a friend
Cheesey (10-Feb) : Easy to be a “tough guy” when your defense is killing the other team.
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : I'm serious. Dude wants to crush people and apologize later. Kill!!!
Cheesey (9-Feb) : Yup Mucky! I agree! A killer D can make any QB look good.
Mucky Tundra (9-Feb) : Cheesey, Trent Dilfer could win a super with that team and probably had a higher completion percentage against Wash and NO and no floating passes
Mucky Tundra (9-Feb) : Zero, I cant tell if you're being sarcastic, serious or both lol
Cheesey (9-Feb) : If Rodgers has Tampa’s defense, he would win SBs too.
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : I believe that. I love the guys fire and killer instinct. Wish we had a QB with that.
Mucky Tundra (9-Feb) : Zero, Brady just wants it more than the next guy
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : Former NFL coach Marty Schottenheimer has passed away,
Zero2Cool (9-Feb) : The defense is because of Brady. That's how amazing great he is.
Mucky Tundra (9-Feb) : The Patriots and Bucs D allowed 0 TDs in their last two super bowl victories. unreal
Mucky Tundra (9-Feb) : and it just looked a little funky to anyone since they took away stops from the Chiefs D and Tampa scored TDs off the drives
Mucky Tundra (9-Feb) : Zero, the penalties were a little iffy and compared to what was going on when GB played Tampa absolutely nothing. Throw in the timing of them (bailed Tampa out of INT and a failed 3rd down conversion)
Zero2Cool (8-Feb) : The #Cardinals and long-time Pro Bowl CB Patrick Peterson are parting ways, per @MattVerderame
Zero2Cool (8-Feb) : It was funny reading comments. Brady is amazing! I look at scoreboard, 9 points? Brady did that? lol
Zero2Cool (8-Feb) : I remembered it and started following in Twitter. Seems the officials were thinking the game was bout them
yooperfan (8-Feb) : Just another fixed game by the NFL. The officiating decided another game. I’m sick of it.🤬
Cheesey (8-Feb) : Mahomes has to run for his life all game.
Mucky Tundra (8-Feb) : Zero, I was watching it closely until the Fournette TD in the 3rd. Was hoping Mahomes would put on a show
Cheesey (8-Feb) : I didn’t care who won. Besides, I don’t have “Hulu”! 😂
packerfanoutwest (8-Feb) : Fuck Brady and the refs
Zero2Cool (8-Feb) : No shame in it. Just have no interest in it. Deadliest Decade 90s got me all day.
Zero2Cool (8-Feb) : Lol you guys watching the Super Bowl. Hulu for this guy. 😊
Cheesey (8-Feb) : Imagine what the Packers could do with that defense???
Cheesey (8-Feb) : Tampa’s defense should be MVP.
Cheesey (8-Feb) : To me, the commercials sucked too.
Mucky Tundra (8-Feb) : It's a look that says "even if I can make it close, the refs will put their thumb on the scale"
Cheesey (8-Feb) : Mahomes has the same look on his face thatRodgers had.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2020 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 13 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Sep 20 @ 12:00 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Sep 27 @ 7:20 PM
Saints
Monday, Oct 5 @ 8:00 PM
FALCONS
Sunday, Oct 18 @ 3:25 PM
Buccaneers
Sunday, Oct 25 @ 12:00 PM
Texans
Sunday, Nov 1 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 5 @ 7:20 PM
49ers
Sunday, Nov 15 @ 12:00 PM
JAGUARS
Sunday, Nov 22 @ 3:25 PM
Colts
Sunday, Nov 29 @ 7:20 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 6 @ 3:25 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Dec 13 @ 3:25 PM
Lions
Saturday, Dec 19 @ 7:15 PM
PANTHERS
Sunday, Dec 27 @ 7:20 PM
TITANS
Sunday, Jan 3 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

21-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

19-Feb / Around The NFL / Cheesey

19-Feb / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

17-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

16-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

15-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2021 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.