Actually, on a dry track we probably would have lost by more.

Its not MLF, its not SF.

We are not good enough yet personnel wise. We need to be better along both lines and the defensive backfield. We had to keep at least 1 guy in to block their 4, and sometimes 2. We were in trouble against any blitz.

On defense, we are generally weak against the run because we have to run a 2 high shell to protect our deficient db's.

Their lines were, and are better than our lines.

If we want to win the Superbowl, we need to improve dramatically the OL, DL, ILB play, and db's.

Originally Posted by: Martha Careful 

We lost because of the kicker.

Originally Posted by: umair_010 

We lost because of the kicker.

Originally Posted by: umair_010 

Sure but it's not just about the 3 points. It's the momentum as well. That was a critical part of the game. And yes I know we can point at other things as well.

Originally Posted by: umair_010 

This comment reads as if someone looked at the box score and didn't watch the game. And then still doesn't grasp that a FG is 3 points so at most it'd be a tie, lol.

I will assume you watched the game and Anders Carlson is just the lazy whipping boy for our frustrations. There were many opportunities for the Packers to seal this game and the Packers collectively failed. I can name 10 reasons why we didn't win and one missed 41 yard FG would not make the list. Why? Because a FG is 3 points and the Packers lost by 3 points and you can't win if you tie. Simple math! 🤣😜😜😜

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool