wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
9 years ago

If we were to only keep 5 guys, I absolutely believe Boykin could've been in trouble.

We know Cobb and Nelson are making it without question, and so is Adams as a 2nd round pick. That eats up the first 3 slots. Only two remain.

Janis is a guy who has measurables that are better than nearly everyone at the WR position in the entire NFL. If he played well, and he has, how are you going to cut that unique specimen? You aren't. That would eat up 4 spots leaving only one more if we were to keep 5.

That leaves Abbrederis vs. Boykin. A 5th rounder, who by all rights, could've gone much higher than he did vs. a guy who came to us via tryout as a UDFA...we didn't even sign Boykin as a UDFA, initially, he only got a tryout to be signed. The hardest road of all. Let's say Abbrederis lit it up like Janis has, which was a real possibility. Do you think it's so unlikely a 5th round hot shot rookie wouldn't be kept over Boykin who has very poor speed? I don't. Yes, Boykin proved to be a solid NFL WR, but he was not a precious draft choice. We all know how those are valued in Green Bay.

To me, it was no stretch at all to say it was well within the realm of possibility that Boykin may not have been Top 5. MM's quote on Boykin was very flattering toward Jarrett, but that was prior to seeing all the guys who would be in competition against him. If forced to choose, how could you easily just say I'd take Boykin over Janis? That is where it likely, in my view, would've come to had Abbrederis not gotten hurt if we were only going to keep 5.

Boykin is a fine WR...I don't dislike him or his game at all. He has excellent hands and knows how to play the position. He's just not flashy and offers little in the way of speed. Abbrederis, Janis, Boykin... Who would you rather hold onto?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 




No sense debating what would have happened if Abbrederis wasn't injured. We can all state our theory of what would have happened. We may as well say they were all right and are all wrong.

As far as Boykins' speed, I don't care. There have been so many "possession receivers" in the NFL it shows teams value guys who run the correct routes and CATCH THE BALL that there was room for Boykin on this team. If speed alone was enough there would be a Renaldo Nehemiah on every team. Having 5 receivers was not set in stone. They may have tried to slip Janis through to the PS.


UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
9 years ago

As much as some of you seem to hate Boykin... he's not getting cut this year... it's been pretty much that simple from the start... you can blah blah blah about this guy or blah blah blah about that guy... simple fact unless Boykins gets injured and does something horrible stupid or evil... he's been basically a lock to make the team.


He's just the new obsession for people to stupidly hate on... I guess they get tired of waiting for Hawk and Bush to get cut and have moved on to Boykin...

[-(

Originally Posted by: beast 



Who hates Boykin? I like the guy... I can't say that I like him more than Jeff Janis...or I would've liked him more than Abby. Is it really hard to believe that Boykin may not have been among the Top 5. Yes, it is speculation...that is mostly what these forums are for. Fans speculate on things. My speculation includes the idea that Boykin may not have been a lock if you're going to keep only 5. The Rams broadcast team (Andrew Siciliano) stated on the broadcast the Packers know they can't slip Janis onto the PS, and I believe that was before he went V12 and scored. I think it is a reasonable assumption Janis is making this team.

If you had to choose...who would you cut between the two? Boykin or Janis? That will answer the question about whether it's really so crazy to believe Boykin may not have been Top 5.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
9 years ago

Who hates Boykin? I like the guy... I can't say that I like him more than Jeff Janis...or I would've liked him more than Abby. Is it really hard to believe that Boykin may not have been among the Top 5. Yes, it is speculation...that is mostly what these forums are for. Fans speculate on things. My speculation includes the idea that Boykin may not have been a lock if you're going to keep only 5. The Rams broadcast team (Andrew Siciliano) stated on the broadcast the Packers know they can't slip Janis onto the PS, and I believe that was before he went V12 and scored. I think it is a reasonable assumption Janis is making this team.

If you had to choose...who would you cut between the two? Boykin or Janis? That will answer the question about whether it's really so crazy to believe Boykin may not have been Top 5.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Boykin.

The list is long for the Janis type of receiver that fans have clamorer for, Uncle Teddy released, another team grabs and then the guy is never heard from again. There will be yet another "Janis" next year.


UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
9 years ago

Boykin.

The list is long for the Janis type of receiver that fans have clamorer for, Uncle Teddy released, another team grabs and then the guy is never heard from again. There will be yet another "Janis" next year.

Originally Posted by: wpr 




I don't know that there'll be another Janis next year... not with those measurables... they are truly rare...not just he's a run of the mill small school guy like all the others. He's different. Truly special.

Bob McGinnn also wrote that he will not be able to be slid through to the PS.

No way I risk a guy with the ceiling of Janis for Jarrett Boykin. Fortunately, we don't have to choose.

UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


evad04
9 years ago

Boykin.

The list is long for the Janis type of receiver that fans have clamorer for, Uncle Teddy released, another team grabs and then the guy is never heard from again. There will be yet another "Janis" next year.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Well, there are rumblings out Cleveland that Charles Johnson has been impressing at Browns camp. That's a guy that slipped through the PS cracks. Another 7th rounder, like Janis.

I think this hypothetical would-they, wouldn't-they about keeping/cutting Boykin/Janis is kind of pointless.

But I also don't think it would have been impossible to keep six WRs. There are a handful of positions where there's a lot of debate over how many to keep.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
StoicFire
9 years ago

Who hates Boykin?

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I don't think anyone necessarily hates Boykin. I just feel like he isn't getting anywhere near the respect he deserves. He played REALLY good football last year.

Part of what I'm struggling with is though is this type of analysis:

If we were to only keep 5 guys, I absolutely believe Boykin could've been in trouble.

We know Cobb and Nelson are making it without question, and so is Adams as a 2nd round pick. That eats up the first 3 slots. Only two remain.

Janis is a guy who has measurables that are better than nearly everyone at the WR position in the entire NFL. If he played well, and he has, how are you going to cut that unique specimen? You aren't. That would eat up 4 spots leaving only one more if we were to keep 5.

That leaves Abbrederis vs. Boykin. A 5th rounder, who by all rights, could've gone much higher than he did vs. a guy who came to us via tryout as a UDFA...we didn't even sign Boykin as a UDFA, initially, he only got a tryout to be signed. The hardest road of all. Let's say Abbrederis lit it up like Janis has, which was a real possibility. Do you think it's so unlikely a 5th round hot shot rookie wouldn't be kept over Boykin who has very poor speed? I don't. Yes, Boykin proved to be a solid NFL WR, but he was not a precious draft choice. We all know how those are valued in Green Bay.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



It doesn't matter to me one bit if he was a tryout player or was cut by the Jaguars or whatever; the dude can play!

Players aren't their measurements... they aren't numbers or stats like in Madden. Very talented individuals with incredible physiques sometimes don't pan out, and off-the-radar type guys sometimes succeed. I would feel really dumb if I argued for a JaMarcus Russell over a Tom Brady solely because of where they were picked or what their measurements were.

Janis is no longer a secret that can be hidden on a Practice Squad, so we know now that he will likely make the roster. I'm not really interested in the 'what could've been' discussions over Abbrederis either because it is what it is. I'm just suggesting that Boykin seems under-appreciated sometimes just because he's not wildly fast or because he came in undrafted.

"the Quarterback can run if he wants to, but with this rocket attached to your body... who would?" -Aaron Rodgers
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
9 years ago

I don't know that there'll be another Janis next year... not with those measurables... they are truly rare...not just he's a run of the mill small school guy like all the others. He's different. Truly special.

Bob McGinnn also wrote that he will not be able to be slid through to the PS.

No way I risk a guy with the ceiling of Janis for Jarrett Boykin. Fortunately, we don't have to choose.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



OH MY!!!!! Why was he NOT a first round pick? That was sheer madness and folly by every single GM for 6+ rounds.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
9 years ago

Well, there are rumblings out Cleveland that Charles Johnson has been impressing at Browns camp. That's a guy that slipped through the PS cracks. Another 7th rounder, like Janis.

Originally Posted by: evad04 



I know. I didn't mean to imply that none of the other WR had ever amounted to anything.


I think this hypothetical would-they, wouldn't-they about keeping/cutting Boykin/Janis is kind of pointless.

Originally Posted by: evad04 

Agreed



But I also don't think it would have been impossible to keep six WRs. There are a handful of positions where there's a lot of debate over how many to keep.

Originally Posted by: evad04 



agreed. My first roster predictions had 6
UserPostedImage
DarkaneRules
9 years ago
Who cares? He's here. He's talented. And that's awesome.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
beast
9 years ago

Who cares? He's here. He's talented. And that's awesome.

Originally Posted by: DarkaneRules 

That is what's awesome 👍
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : Jordan Love CAN sign an extension as of today. Might tak weeks/months though
TheKanataThrilla (2h) : Packers decline 5th year option for Stokes
Mucky Tundra (6h) : @ProFootballTalk Jaylen Warren: Steelers' special teams coach has discussed Justin Fields returning kicks.
Zero2Cool (15h) : Season officially ending tonight for Bucks ... sad face
Zero2Cool (15h) : Giannis Antetokounmpo is listed as out for tonight's game.
dfosterf (19h) : Surprisingly low initially is my guess cap wise, but gonna pay the piper after that
dfosterf (19h) : The number on Love is going to be brutal.
Zero2Cool (20h) : May 3rd. Extension day for Jordan Love. (soonest)
Zero2Cool (1-May) : USFL MVP QB Alex McGough moved to WR. So that's why no WR drafted!
earthquake (1-May) : Packers draft starters at safety ever few years. Collins, Clinton-Dix, Savage
beast (1-May) : Why can't the rookies be a day 1 starter? Especially when we grabbed 3 of them at the position
dfosterf (1-May) : Not going to be shocked if Gilmore goes to the Lions.
dfosterf (1-May) : I hear you dhazer, but my guess would be Gilmore Colts and Howard Vikings from what little has been reported.
Mucky Tundra (30-Apr) : S learn from McKinney who learns from Hafley who learns from the fans. Guaranteed Super Bowl
Zero2Cool (30-Apr) : could*
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : Safeties should learn from Xavier.
dhazer (29-Apr) : And what about grabbing a Gilmore or Howard at CB ? Those are all Free Agents left
dhazer (29-Apr) : out of curiosity do they try and sign Simmons or Hyde to let these young safeties learn from, they can't be day 1 starters.
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : I miss having Sam Shields.
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : Not that he's making excuses, just pointing it out
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : That's for dang sure. Make our erratic kicker have no excuse!
packerfanoutwest (28-Apr) : having a great long snapper is gold
Zero2Cool (28-Apr) : LaFleur looking like he had some weight. Coachin will do that lol
Zero2Cool (28-Apr) : Thanks Mucky and whomever created topcos for each pick!
Zero2Cool (28-Apr) : Insane about Kingsley
dfosterf (28-Apr) : Putring it here so Mucky sees it. He was our guy!
dfosterf (28-Apr) : Bowden long snapper Wisconsin. Consensus best LS in college.
dfosterf (28-Apr) : We got Peter Bowde
dfosterf (28-Apr) : I personally interpret that as a partial tear that can be recovered from with rehab
dfosterf (28-Apr) : MLF said Kingsley Enagbare did NOT tear his ACL and did NOT require surgery, and that he is "looking good" for the 2024 season!
beast (28-Apr) : T.O. son signs with the 49ers
Mucky Tundra (28-Apr) : damn those vikings
beast (27-Apr) : UDFA Vikings sign TE – Trey Knox, South Carolina
beast (27-Apr) : Kitchen was all high from Miami, he was more lucky than talented in 2022 and it showed in 2023
beast (27-Apr) : Reportedly Packers have UDFAs Jennings and Jones
beast (27-Apr) : OL – Donovan Jennings, USF OT – Trente Jones, Michigan
TheKanataThrilla (27-Apr) : Interesting draft. A bit shocked that we didn't select an early CB. Definitely have Safety help. Pretty happy overall.
dhazer (27-Apr) : wow the last 2 picks are really stupid and probably will be special teams players Top 10 draft pick next year book it
TheKanataThrilla (27-Apr) : I think he ended up with a terrible RAS score
dhazer (27-Apr) : Anyone know what went on with Kitchens from Florida? At 1 point he was to be the Packers 1st round and he is way down the board now
Martha Careful (27-Apr) : Z, could you please combine my thread with yours please. I obviously did not see it when I Created it
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Re: 'Kool-Aid' McKinstry. Other than Icky Woods, has there ever been a good NFLer with a childish nickname?
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Packers looking to trade up
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Flag?
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Sag?
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : It rhymes with "bag."
beast (26-Apr) : Family? That's Deadpool's F word
Nonstopdrivel (26-Apr) : Not THAT f-word.
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : fuck
beast (25-Apr) : 49ers are Cap Tight
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2023 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 10 @ 3:25 PM
Bears
Sunday, Sep 17 @ 12:00 PM
Falcons
Sunday, Sep 24 @ 12:00 PM
SAINTS
Thursday, Sep 28 @ 7:15 PM
LIONS
Monday, Oct 9 @ 7:15 PM
Raiders
Sunday, Oct 22 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Sunday, Oct 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Nov 5 @ 12:00 PM
RAMS
Sunday, Nov 12 @ 12:00 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 19 @ 12:00 PM
CHARGERS
Thursday, Nov 23 @ 11:30 AM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 3 @ 7:20 PM
CHIEFS
Monday, Dec 11 @ 7:15 PM
Giants
Sunday, Dec 17 @ 12:00 PM
BUCCANEERS
Sunday, Dec 24 @ 12:00 PM
Panthers
Sunday, Dec 31 @ 7:20 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 7 @ 3:25 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 14 @ 3:30 PM
Cowboys
Saturday, Jan 20 @ 7:15 PM
49ers
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / go.pack.go.

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

1-May / Packers Draft Threads / dfosterf

30-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

29-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

29-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

29-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

29-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

28-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

28-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.