This. What's also funny is the women were ages 31 and 33 while Underwood is only 23. What? How can a 23 year old commit sexual assault against two women who are both older than him, at the same time?

Can a rich man ever feel safe having consensual sex with an unknown woman again? heheh.

"Wade" wrote:

If I ever become rich ... and some how get broads ... I'm printing off a dozen of these   whenever I leave the house.

"Wade" wrote:

If those hold up in court I'm printing them off right now. I think the fun part would be getting people to sign it lol.

"Wade" wrote:

I think it's hard to say they weren't about off-field issues - that is to say Whitt's comments were somewhat intended at Underwood as a person.

This incident, although unfortunate, should not be a major surprise. Coming out in the draft, in the draft rankings compiled by McGinn based on talking to many scouts, he (McGinn) had Underwood as a top-100 prospect. Remember: we got Underwood in the 6th round; there is a disparity between where Underwood's talent should have gotten him drafted and where he fell to us at.

What became evident was that many scouts questioned Underwood as a person, not his football talent; his behaviour and conduct off the field.

Frankly, unless Underwood shows he is leaps and bounds above Bush / Bell, I'd say cut ties with him. This type of behaviour may very well keep teams away from him, and if the team likes Underwood's potential then they may have a chance to resign him to the PS and give him another year to mature.

"TengoJuego" wrote:

At the very bare minimum, he cheated on his wife.

Are the Packers suppose to condone that? Is that the type of image the Packers want?

"TheEngineer" wrote:

Cut his ass, I say. Don't need nor want that headache.

"TheEngineer" wrote:

Can we wait for the smoke to clear before we cut anybody? No? Too reasonable? Alright then.

"tromadz" wrote: