Boldin for a third? · PACKERSHOME

Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/03/report-cardinals-want-a-third-round-pick-for-boldin/

Report: Cardinals want a third-round pick for Boldin

We're stacked at the position, but damn! Can he return kicks!?

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

beast
Select Member

14 years ago

Yeah but doesn't he want a contract bigger than Jennings? ... and he wants playing time... it's a good deal IMO for a team in need of a starting WR... but with Driver and Jennings as starters... and hopefully Jones or Nelson stepping up... I don't think it's a good deal as the Packers will have to pay him a lot of money or they get a one year WR for a 3rd...

Packers_Finland
Registered

14 years ago

For 30 teams in the league, that's one hell of a deal. But really? Jennings, Driver, Jones, Nelson, Boldin? Wouldn't that be a bit of a luxury on one position.

This is a placeholder

Rockmolder
Honored Member

14 years ago

For 30 teams in the league, that's one hell of a deal. But really? Jennings, Driver, Jones, Nelson, Boldin? Wouldn't that be a bit of a luxury on one position.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:

We're going with Golden Tate, anyway.

But you're right. There's no reason at all to add Boldin to our team, imo. He's a 29 year old player who's looking for his last big pay day. We'd have tons of money invested in the WR position, while we have one of the best groups, already.

And looking at our receiving core as a whole, we also have Finley who'emerging. That gives you another potential 1000 yard receiver. We really don't need him.

Pack93z
Select Member

14 years ago

If we needed a WR.. this would be of huge consideration.. the guy is a gamer.

But how would he fit in and what would be the fallout in the locker room for not only his contract but his catches as well.

Rock - I would love Tate in Green Bay.. let him tutor under Driver for a year or two and then slide into the regular rotation when Driver exits or his game diminishes.

All Tate did in college was make plays.. they knock him for his size.. his speed before the combine.. this or that.. he played for Notre Dame.. blah blah blah... the kid just made plays.. and that is never a bad thing.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

gbguy20
Veteran Member

14 years ago

I am shocked that Boldin is 29 already.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

get_louder_at_lambeau
Registered

14 years ago

If I was the Bears, I'd be all over him.

http://packersnews.net

doddpower
Veteran Member

14 years ago

I'm not saying I'd be all about this, but trading Driver for a 4-5th and then sending our 3rd to the Cardinals for Boldin? Get a younger player at about the same skill level or better and get an extra 4th-5th to perhaps package to move back up into the 3rd if need be, as well as negating some of the money tied up in our WR rotation. Hmm?

However, I know this deal will never happen. There will be other teams out there such as the Ravens that will be MUCH more willing to give up at least a 3rd for him. It's still interesting to think about though, especially while wasting time at the office!

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

For 30 teams in the league, that's one hell of a deal. But really? Jennings, Driver, Jones, Nelson, Boldin? Wouldn't that be a bit of a luxury on one position.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:

What about Finley?

If we get Boldin, I say we ship Nelson or Jones for a 1st and a entire starting OL. 🙂

nerdmann
Premier Member Topic Starter

14 years ago

#10

"doddpower" wrote:

No way Ted Thompson could ever trade DD. Not after what happened a couple summers ago. And what's happening now with Kampman.
That said, can Boldin return punts?

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (29m) : Kanata, seek help! lol

beast (2h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status

Zero2Cool (2h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha

TheKanataThrilla (2h) : That was terrible.

TheKanataThrilla (2h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.

beast (3h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent

beast (3h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime

beast (3h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing

Zero2Cool (4h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is

Zero2Cool (4h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true

beast (5h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management

wpr (7h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.

Mucky Tundra (14h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago

beast (15h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years

Zero2Cool (21h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.

packerfanoutwest (22h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it

beast (23h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done

Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.

Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS