RedSoxExcel
14 years ago
I watched last night's game with a life long Vikings fan. He wasn't even there for the SB losses but has seen enough in his day (for example Minny v. Falcons or that Minny v. Cards game to give us the North, etc). But he broke down last night and it was sad man.

I felt for him on so many levels, as a friend and as a fan. After the Cards/Packers game I was sad and wondered why I invest so much into sports but at the end of hte day I have 1996, no matter what.

They have nothing. And to lose like that. 35 yard line, two runs (if just ONE got some yards, they have a chance at FG). That 12 man in the huddle call AFTER a timeout! The INT! The coin toss. The Asher Allen PI on 3rd and 5 in OT. The DROPPED sure INT off the Colston drop right into the Vikings safeties hands. The 4th and inches (HOW did he hold on to the ball with the helmet hit). The PI on the LB, when he didn't touch him AND it was uncatchable. A kicker in the post season FINALLY actually kicks a FG.

I know its fun to rub into their faces but man that was a LOSS. I looked into my friends eyes as taht FG went into nad it was just pure PAIN. What a way to lose. A fumble at the 4 yard line, a fumble at the 10 yard line, a fumble at your own 15. That could have been a 21 point swing alone.

Vikings fans, I feel for you. I no longer doing my "Got SuperBowl?" jokes.

But Saints fan, you deserve it too after what that city has been through.
blank
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
I don't think I've ever made a Super Bowl crack to Vikings fans. Some people seriously need new material.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
14 years ago
It's pretty sad what some fanbases have been through. The Bills are on that same level. You could make a case for the Chargers, Cardinals etc. Sometimes, it might be better to just go down like the Lions than it is to get your hopes crushed in a way like this.

This one was a real heartbreaker. I have to admit, I wasn't rooting for the Vikings. I think that most Packers fans wheren't. But still, this one is pretty sad.
RedSoxExcel
14 years ago

It's pretty sad what some fanbases have been through. The Bills are on that same level. You could make a case for the Chargers, Cardinals etc. Sometimes, it might be better to just go down like the Lions than it is to get your hopes crushed in a way like this.

This one was a real heartbreaker. I have to admit, I wasn't rooting for the Vikings. I think that most Packers fans wheren't. But still, this one is pretty sad.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Exactly, I'd rather be a Lions fan. These types of defeats take so much out of you.

But Bills fans, oh man. Imagine losing FOUR Super Bowls in a ROW. Including one in which you just had ot hit a FG and your whole lives would be completely different. Plus that Music City Miracle in Tennesse. Wow. That city's never even won anything, hockey too, many heart breaks.
blank
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
I dunno about the Saints love anymore. To be honest, it looked to me like their game plan on defense was to take Favre out of the game. Not just hammer him, that's fine. But several of those hits were borderline (or across the border) cheap shots. If it happens once, I can understand. But it happened several times.

I don't think the Vikings played well enough to win. You ought not to go to a Super Bowl after a game with that many turnovers. And if you do, you're a pretender.

But IMO if I were a Saint, I wouldn't be standing all that proud today either. To me, the Saints played like the streets of New Orleans they warn tourists against.

You know the ones. The ones that, despite all the post-Katrina love for the Big Easy, still make New Orleans one of the most dangerous cities in America.

No, I'm sorry. Count me among those who won't be watching the Super Bowl. I don't believe in "lesser of two evils" voting. And I don't want either of those teams to win.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
14 years ago
The only hit that wasn't a clean shot as he was throwing was the late hit after he handed off the ball, and the guy was flagged for it. Hell, I don't consider it out of the realm of possibility that he thought Favre still had it on a bootleg after a fake hand-off. It was a physical game. I strongly disagree that there was anything dirty about it.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
14 years ago

The only hit that wasn't a clean shot as he was throwing was the late hit after he handed off the ball, and the guy was flagged for it. Hell, I don't consider it out of the realm of possibility that he thought Favre still had it on a bootleg after a fake hand-off. It was a physical game. I strongly disagree that there was anything dirty about it.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



Exactly. He actually got a BS call for him when the DT drove him to the ground, while he couldn't know the ball was out already.

I saw one cheap hit and the others where all legal. Maybe some where harder than necessary, instead of regular tackles, they often went for the big hit, but I wouldn't call that dirty. It's a strategy you take to bang up a pocket passer. It can backfire horribly, because you can usually make the tacklers miss more often. It worked for them yesterday, though.
14 years ago

The only hit that wasn't a clean shot as he was throwing was the late hit after he handed off the ball, and the guy was flagged for it. Hell, I don't consider it out of the realm of possibility that he thought Favre still had it on a bootleg after a fake hand-off. It was a physical game. I strongly disagree that there was anything dirty about it.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Exactly. He actually got a BS call for him when the DT drove him to the ground, while he couldn't know the ball was out already.

I saw one cheap hit and the others where all legal. Maybe some where harder than necessary, instead of regular tackles, they often went for the big hit, but I wouldn't call that dirty. It's a strategy you take to bang up a pocket passer. It can backfire horribly, because you can usually make the tacklers miss more often. It worked for them yesterday, though.

"MassPackersFan" wrote:



I usually wouldn't say anything about that hit where he was driven into the ground, but Brees took an identical hit later on in the game and no flag was thrown, so I have to say it was a b.s. call, or a b.s. no call on Brees. I prefer the former.
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
How about going for the back of his knees on the play where he had to be helped to the sideline afterwards?

How about Darren Sharper launching himself at his neck?

Sorry, I don't buy it. I don't give a shit what the Joe Bucks and the Troy Aikmans of the world say. It looked like the Saint strategy on defense went well beyond "hit him hard and hit him often." Well beyond "take his head out of the game." It looked to me like it was "take him out of the game."

And I don't give a rat's ass whether the hits were legal or not. My standard for play isn't what's legal. Alex Gibb's offensive blocking system is legal, and it's immoral as hell, based in techniques that are so dangerous you can't practice them.

A cheap shot isn't cheap because it's against the rules. A cheap shot is cheap because it's not justified by the morality of the contest.

What the Saints did wasn't hard football. It was bush league. It's in the same realm as Buddy Ryan "bounties" and Forrest Gregg "hit list" territory. As Warren Sapp's hit on Chad Clifton.

Yes, I wanted the Vikings to lose. Yes,I want Favre to retire and just go away. In my opinion, the only thing worse than the Vikings winning a Superbowl is the Cowboys losing a Superbowl. Yes, I'm glad the Vikings aren't in the Super Bowl.

But in my opinion the Saints defense played like a bunch of thugs. And if they were executing Gregg Williams' and Sean Payton's game plan, then they're thugs, too.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
14 years ago
I can't comment on the hit to the back of the knees, because I wasn't watching the player who went low to see how it happened. I just didn't see anything out of the ordinary. That's pretty much what happens when an immobile QB throws into the face of blitzes, and the Vikings did a piss poor job protecting him.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (48m) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (20h) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
22h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.