Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
In La Crosse, we have smoky bars and smokefree bars. The rare times I go to a bar in this town, I usually go to the smokefree bars, because I prefer not to walk out with a migraine. That's my point. If there is a market for smokefree bars, people will build them, as they have here. If there isn't a market for them -- that is, if people aren't willing to put their money where their mouth is and patronize smokefree bars -- people shouldn't run crying to the government to do for them what they won't do for themselves, to cover for their own financial cowardice. You know why we have minimum markup laws for gasoline? Because gas stations used to engage in price wars, in which stupid customers would flock to the stations that were offering gas under cost (when it was obvious to anyone with the slightest shred of foresight what was going to happen), then cry bloody murder when the companies secured a monopoly and jacked the prices way up. If the customers had had the sense to patronize the little guys who were offering gasoline at fair prices, we wouldn't need minimum markup laws these days.

It's like the constant debates we have on Student Senate over imposing new segregated fees for every new service the campus wants to offer. "Well, if we don't charge EVERYONE for this wonderful service," proponents wail, "we won't have enough funding to keep it open!" Well, then good riddance, say I. Let the market decide. If the service would go under without mandatory funding, obviously there isn't much of a market for it. Forcing everyone to pay for a service only a tiny minority of students will actually use -- and which they don't even want badly enough to cough up an out-of-pocket fee when they do use it -- is just bad ethics, in my opinion. Every "important service" we offer to students on campus can be found somewhere off campus -- usually for cheaper than we can offer it.
UserPostedImage
djcubez
15 years ago
I agree with you nonstop but the thing about smoking is that it went from culturally acceptable to a health hazard. In fact cigarettes used to be recommended by some doctors. But since bars were always allowed to have cigarettes it seems unfair to just take them away even though they risk non-smokers health. It would be easy to give bars the choice to be smoke-free or smoking-allowed but all the bars would pick smoking allowed because they wouldn't have to change anything. The people that don't smoke would keep avoiding the bars and nothing would change. That's why the situation is so hard to control and an outright ban is the only workable solution. Maybe after a few years of having all no-smoking bars they could allow the bars to adopt a smoking-acceptable policy.

I hope you understand what I'm trying to say I'm tired and can't get my ideas across very well right now lol.

As far as universities decisions you have my deepest sympathies. I hate most of the decisions our school makes that I just choose not to get involved. Schools are so good at making money but so bad at spending it. Recently UWM spent money painting flashy logos on all their bus shuttles. It sickens me to think of the other improvements they could have made. I'm going to graduate in the next year and I'll get the hell out.
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
Actually, I've talked to owners of bars who say they're looking forward to the impending smoking ban because it relieves them of responsibility for being first. It's not that they don't want to be smoke free -- it's that they don't want to be the first to go smoke free. I don't really understand that logic; perhaps someone can explain it to me. My best guess is they're afraid of the ostracization that might come from being the first, since other bar owners would resent having to follow suit? But again that makes no sense, since they claim to want to be smoke free.
UserPostedImage
djcubez
15 years ago

Actually, I've talked to owners of bars who say they're looking forward to the impending smoking ban because it relieves them of responsibility for being first. It's not that they don't want to be smoke free -- it's that they don't want to be the first to go smoke free. I don't really understand that logic; perhaps someone can explain it to me. My best guess is they're afraid of the ostracization that might come from being the first, since other bar owners would resent having to follow suit? But again that makes no sense, since they claim to want to be smoke free.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:


I can't wait myself. I've walked out of bars because they're too smoky plenty of times before.
Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago
I prefer to do my drinking in the comfort of my own home anyway. Preferably on my couch with a hot, naked girl. Or two.
UserPostedImage
djcubez
15 years ago

I prefer to do my drinking in the comfort of my own home anyway. Preferably on my couch with a hot, naked girl. Or two.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:


See I have this problem every weekend. All my friends want to go to the bar and I don't understand it. We just end up doing whatever we'd be doing at home but at the bar except we're paying at least double for every drink we have. My friends wake up the next morning saying "Dammit I blew $50 bucks at the bar last night." Yea, that's what happens.
Formo
  • Formo
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

I prefer to do my drinking in the comfort of my own home anyway. Preferably on my couch with a hot, naked girl. Or two.

"djcubez" wrote:


See I have this problem every weekend. All my friends want to go to the bar and I don't understand it. We just end up doing whatever we'd be doing at home but at the bar except we're paying at least double for every drink we have. My friends wake up the next morning saying "Dammit I blew $50 bucks at the bar last night." Yea, that's what happens.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Yeah.

That's a fraction of the reason I stopped drinking. There was no point at the age of 21 to go to the bar and spend $100 in one night when that same amount would bring more fun for 2-3 nights at home. Not to mention, we didn't have to worry about walking home or getting kicked out or whatever.

Eventually, when I moved away from all my friends/drinking buddies.. I just stopped drinking altogether.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (52m) : @mattschneidman Matt LaFleur on MarShawn Lloyd: “He’s gonna miss some time.”
Mucky Tundra (22h) : CLIFFORD WITH THE TD WITH UNDER 2 TO GO!!!!!
Zero2Cool (16-Aug) : 90 MINUTES UNTIL FAKE KICKOFF!!
Martha Careful (16-Aug) : I think Ruven is a bot, but regardless should be stricken from the site.
Zero2Cool (14-Aug) : Packers RB Josh Jacobs ranked No. 33 in NFL 'Top 100'
dfosterf (13-Aug) : The LVN Musgrave collision- Andy Herman said Musgrave seemed to be the one most impacted injury-wise
dfosterf (13-Aug) : a lower back injury
dfosterf (13-Aug) : Doubs says he's "fine" after injury scare. Some reported it as z
Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : With LVN that is; need to see what happens in the next practice
Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : beast, reading about what happened, it sounded like one of those "two guys collide and are moving slow afterwards" type of deals
beast (12-Aug) : I believe Musgrave has been injured every single season since at least a Sophomore in highschool
packerfanoutwest (12-Aug) : Matt LaFleur: “Highly unlikely” Jordan Love plays more this preseason
dfosterf (12-Aug) : Doubs, Savion Williams, LVN, Musgrave all banged up to one degree or another, missing one here I forget
Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : RB Tyrion Davis-Price is signing with the Green Bay Packers.
Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : zero help, dominated. preseason
beast (12-Aug) : QB Jordan Love has surgery
beast (12-Aug) : Martha said Morgan had a lot of help, I didn't watch the OL so I can't say.
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers LT Jordan Morgan did not allow a single pressure across 23 pass-blocking snaps vs. Jets last night, per PFF
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : With buckeye and the reasonable couple, we're currently sitting at 10
buckeyepackfan (10-Aug) : Just posted to re-up on our FFL.
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
wpr (10-Aug) : I made it through the 1st Q.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Just gotta figure out how.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
beast (10-Aug) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : Sooooooo many penalties
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Well that half was fun
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Great, zayne is down
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
Mucky Tundra (9-Aug) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Woo-hoo
TheKanataThrilla (9-Aug) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier
Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here
dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league
dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
14h / Fantasy Sports Talk / GoPack1984

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / beast

15-Aug / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

13-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12-Aug / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

11-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

11-Aug / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

11-Aug / Around The NFL / packerfanoutwest

10-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.