Nonstopdrivel
15 years ago

Brett Christopherson column: Green Bay Packers can be thankful San Francisco 49ers passed on Aaron Rodgers 

GREEN BAY Since this is the week we're supposed to give thanks for our blessings, we'll use these column inches not to dwell on the latest injury news or that near second-half collapse, but to hand out a well-deserved game ball.

So here you go No. 12. You earned it.

"It's always good to get a win in this league," quarterback Aaron Rodgers said in matter-of-fact fashion after directing the Green Bay Packers to a 30-24 conquest of San Francisco on Sunday at Lambeau Field. "It's fun to play against a team that you idolized growing up and you watched every Sunday after church."

That's it? That's all you're giving us? No controversy? No smack talk? No sense of vindication? No wanting to "stick it" to the franchise that shunned you for keep the chuckling at a simmer, folks Alex Smith?

Can somebody please supply a little ammunition?

"Any time you go back home, as I will (this) week, you definitely want to win," receiver Greg Jennings said, referring to the trip to his native Michigan for Thursday's Thanksgiving Day contest against Detroit. "You definitely want to play well to show your fans back home that you've got a little something they wish they had where they're at."

That little something would be a franchise quarterback, a dude with elite physical tools and a mental toughness and coolness to match.

And he's all yours, Titletown. For at least the next decade barring any unforeseen setbacks, of course.

So, folks, go ahead and breathe a sigh of relief and add that to the list of "things to be thankful for." Rodgers could easily be sporting Niners red and gold instead of Packers green and gold.

Shudder the thought.

"He's everything this organization hoped he would be," left guard Daryn Colledge said of Rodgers, who sliced the San Francisco defense en route to a 344-yard, two-TD, 108.0-passer rating performance. "He's an amazing player. And if we can keep him upright, he's got a chance to be one of the best quarterbacks in this league."

While the primary storyline heading into Sunday's skirmish focused on the Packers' sudden playoff revival in the aftermath of last week's big W over Big D, the most intriguing subplot starred Rodgers and Smith.

As you may have heard, the two are forever conjoined given the circumstances of how the 2005 NFL Draft played out.

Here's the Cliffs Notes version: The Niners held the No. 1 pick that year and tabbed Smith over Rodgers, who played collegiately at nearby California and grew up close to San Francisco. Smith has since scuffled, while Rodgers, who plummeted to Green Bay at No. 24, has flourished.

In 34 starts, Smith has thrown 28 TDs and won 12 games, compared to 48 and 12, respectively, for Rodgers through 26 starts.

Sunday was the first game pitting the two quarterbacks, and Rodgers had his foot pressed on the gas from the outset, guiding the Packers to scores on five of their six first-half possessions to fill the most impressive 30 minutes of offensive football of the year and bring back images of those grandiose preseason days.

Rodgers, himself, threw for a single-half career-high 274 yards in a spurt that saw Green Bay open a 23-3 advantage as he took advantage of decent protection, a productive ground game and the return of tight end Jermichael Finley.

He played with patience, using his checkdowns and finding openings underneath. And he played with poise, completing passes to seven different receivers as the Packers churned out a season-high 484 total yards and went 10-of-18 in third-down efficiency, including six-of-nine in the first half, to extend drives.

His second quarter, 64-yard touchdown connection with Jennings on a slant route displayed Rodgers' growing mastery of the offense when he first looked right and then turned left and uncorked a BB through a small opening.

"It was actually perfect coverage," said Jennings, who finished with five catches for 126 yards. "He came back to me late, actually in the second window, and that was able to get me up the field more. And then I just turned it up and cut back on their safety."

Rodgers looked every bit the No. 1 overall pick, not to mention one of the top quarterbacks in the league. Smith? Not so much, save for a solid second half in which the Niners offensive staff thought it wise to get tight end Vernon Davis involved in the game plan.

But even more impressive than the stats and the slings was Rodgers' unwillingness to provide any interesting sound bites when asked about facing Smith and seeking payback against the team he once rooted for.

Much like he handled the Brett Favre saga, he managed this latest situation with grace and class.

No need to flap the gums. The play will do the talking, instead.

"I think Aaron takes every single game personally," Colledge said. "He's an extremely passionate player. He's exciting to play for. Maybe a little bit on the side, he had a little bit extra (motivation). But he was very professional with it about us and very motivational. He didn't freak out about it."

To be fair, Smith was thrust into the fray as a rookie, has suffered an injury to his throwing shoulder and has had to deal with a revolving door at offensive coordinator, while Rodgers had the benefit of serving as Favre's backup for his first three seasons.

But the clear winner in this debate is the Packers, a fact not lost within the victorious locker room.

"We're going to protect him the second half (of the season)," Colledge said. "And we're going to let everybody know who exactly Aaron Rodgers is. Because he's an extremely special player."


UserPostedImage
djcubez
15 years ago
Hindsight. If they had taken Rodgers would Smith have slipped that far? Who knows who we would have taken instead, maybe even someone that could have led us to the Super Bowl with Favre. I'm not saying I'm not thankful, I'm very thankful we have Rodgers, I'm just saying hindsight is 20/20. Nobody knows for sure if Rodgers would have been as good as he is now if he went to the 49ers.
nerdmann
15 years ago

Hindsight. If they had taken Rodgers would Smith have slipped that far? Who knows who we would have taken instead, maybe even someone that could have led us to the Super Bowl with Favre. I'm not saying I'm not thankful, I'm very thankful we have Rodgers, I'm just saying hindsight is 20/20. Nobody knows for sure if Rodgers would have been as good as he is now if he went to the 49ers.

"djcubez" wrote:




Rodgers would be that good if he was brought along by MM. Mike McCarthy is a QB guru. One of the best in the league.
Meanwhile, Alex Smith has had what? 5 different offensive coordinators in 5 years? No QB could be good through all that.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
15 years ago
I still want to know the last time a QB led the league in passer rating and rushing yards (for QBs) at the midpoint of the season.
UserPostedImage
Trippster
15 years ago
MPF, currently, Favre leads the league in QB rating.
"Let Your Light Shine!"
15 years ago

MPF, currently, Favre leads the league in QB rating.

"Trippster" wrote:



Trippster, that's why I said at the halfway point of the year. We're through Week 11 now. And I realize FAARP leads the league in QB rating right now.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
15 years ago

Hindsight. If they had taken Rodgers would Smith have slipped that far? Who knows who we would have taken instead, maybe even someone that could have led us to the Super Bowl with Favre. I'm not saying I'm not thankful, I'm very thankful we have Rodgers, I'm just saying hindsight is 20/20. Nobody knows for sure if Rodgers would have been as good as he is now if he went to the 49ers.

"nerdmann" wrote:




Rodgers would be that good if he was brought along by Mike McCarthy. Mike McCarthy is a QB guru. One of the best in the league.
Meanwhile, Alex Smith has had what? 5 different offensive coordinators in 5 years? No QB could be good through all that.

"djcubez" wrote:



This is what I was thinking. If Smith would've fallen that far, and would've sat behind Favre for 3 years, maybe he would've been developped into a good QB, as well. Maybe Rodgers would've been the draft bust.

I mean, they didn't have any talent at all when they took Smith with the 1st pick. That can screw a QB up good. Look at Joey Harrington, for instance.

And I don't think that Smith would've fallen that far. The Titans just would've had to snatch him. Smith was the better prospect.

Would've been interesting to see who we ended up with. Jason Campbell? Roddy White? Luis Castillo?
Cal2GreenBay
15 years ago
Mike McCarthy the "quarterback guru" had Alex Smith for one year..
and Alex threw more interceptions than touchdowns...

I don't know if that's more on McCarthy or on Smith...
blank
Cal2GreenBay
15 years ago
Let's keep this in perspective.
Even though Aaron sat behind Favre...Aaron was familiar with the west coast offense because Jeff Tedford from CAL runs a version of it.

Alex Smith ran a gimmicky spread offense in college from Urban Meyer.

Everyone talks about how Tedford's QB's don't do well in the NFL(Aaron's busted that notion by the way). No one talks about that NONE of Urban Meyer's QB's have made the adjustment to the NFL either.

Smith only scored on the pack because the packers were in prevent defense the second half and that's how why his spread offense worked. Smith did terrible the first half when the real packer defense was shown.

Even his coach Mike Singletary says that Smith struggles against the real defenses and only has numbers when they are behind and the defenses soften up.

Alex has never mastered dropping back and viewing the field. That would NOT have changed if he had switched spots w/Aaron. McCarthy had him and he couldn't do anything w/Alex. If McCarthy had Aaron in his first year..you would've seen a difference.
blank
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
I don't believe the Packers were in a prevent defense. Kampman and Harris were out, and we stopped pressuring as much. And the biggest factor in why the 49ers were able to score is because Woodson wasn't covering Vernon Davis that much, it was Jarret Bush.

Alex Smith doesn't look like he has a strong arm. I wasn't paying much attention to him though.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (4h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (4h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (11h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (11h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (12h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (19h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
32m / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

39m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

43m / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.