CaliforniaCheez
15 years ago
WEEK 7

NFC
First Round Bye
1) Saints Winning % 1.000 > vikings .857
2) vikings Winning % .857 > Giants .714

Division Leaders
3) Giants Winning % .714 > Cardinals .667
4) Cardinals

Wild Cards
5) Falcons Strength of Victory .417 > Packers .202
6) Packers Strength of Victory .202 > Eagles .191

The Rest in Order:
7) Eagles Division Winning % 1.000 > Cowboys .000
8) Cowboys Winning % 667 > 49'ers .500
9) 49'ers Conference Winning % .600 > Bears .500
10) Bears Winning % .500 > Panthers .333
11) Panthers Conference Winning % .400 > Seahawks .250
12) Seahwaks Winning % .333 > Redskins .286
13) Redskins Winning % .286 > Lions .167
14) Lions Winning % .167 > Rams .000
15) Rams Strength of Schedule .599 > .541 Bucs
16) Bucanneers




AFC
First Round Bye
1) Denver Strength of Victory .504 > than Colts .306
2) Colts Winning % 1.000 > Bengals .714

Division Leaders
3) Bengals Win over Steelers/Strength of Victory .505>Patriots .319
4) Patriots

Wild Cards
5) Steelers Winning % .714 > Jets .571
6) Jets Head to head win over Texans week 1

The Rest In Order
7) Texans winning % .571 > Jaguars .500
8) Jaguars Conference winning % .667 > Ravens .600
9) Ravens Head to Head win over Chargers week 2
10) Chargers Winning % .500 > Bills .429
11) Bills Winning % .429 > Dolphins .333
12) Dolphins Winning % .333 > Raiders .286
13) Raiders Winning % .286 > Browns .143
14) Browns Conference winning % .200 > Chiefs .000
15) Chiefs Winning % .143 > Titans .000
16) Titans


Current Top of Draft Order:

1) Bucanneers (Winning % .000; Strength of Schedule .541)
2) Rams (Wins .000; SOS .599)
3) Titans (.000; .679)
4) Chiefs (.143; .333)
5) Browns (.143; .697)
6) Lions (.167; .679)
7) Redskins (.286; .289)
8) Raiders (.286; .595)
9) Carolina (.333; .449)
10) Seahawks (.333; .528)
11) Dolphins (.333; .694)
12) Bills (.429; .442)
13) Jaguars (.500; .429)
14) Chargers (.500; .496)
15) Ravens (.500; .512)
16) 49'ers (.500; .516)
17) Bears (.500; .544)
18) Texans (.571; .463)
19) Eagles (.667; .341)
20) Cowboys (.667; .476)

Naturally, this week you want the Packers to beat the vikings, Seahawks to beat the Cowboys, and it depends how ambitious a fan you are whether you want the Eagles to beat the Giants, and the Falcons to beat the Saints.
blank
mi_keys
15 years ago

As I said above, playing a nonconference game hurt the Packers this week.

WEEK 7

NFC
First Round Bye
1) Saints Winning % 1.000 > vikings .857
2) vikings Winning % .857 > Giants .714

Division Leaders
3) Giants Winning % .714 > Cardinals .667
4) Cardinals

Wild Cards
5) Cowboys Head to Head win over Falcons week 7
6) Falcons Strength of Victory .417 > Packers .202

The Rest in Order:
7) Packers Strength of Victory .202 > Eagles .191
8) Eagles Winning % .667 > 49'ers .500
9) 49'ers Conference Winning % .600 > Bears .500
10) Bears Winning % .500 > Panthers .333
11) Panthers Conference Winning % .400 > Seahawks .250
12) Seahwaks Winning % .333 > Redskins .286
13) Redskins Winning % .286 > Lions .167
14) Lions Winning % .167 > Rams .000
15) Rams Strength of Schedule .599 > .541 Bucs
16) Bucanneers




AFC
First Round Bye
1) Denver Strength of Victory .504 > than Colts .306
2) Colts Winning % 1.000 > Bengals .714

Division Leaders
3) Bengals Win over Steelers/Strength of Victory .505>Patriots .319
4) Patriots

Wild Cards
5) Steelers Winning % .714 > Jets .571
6) Jets Head to head win over Texans week 1

The Rest In Order
7) Texans winning % .571 > Jaguars .500
8) Jaguars Conference winning % .667 > Ravens .600
9) Ravens Head to Head win over Chargers week 2
10) Chargers Winning % .500 > Bills .429
11) Bills Winning % .429 > Dolphins .333
12) Dolphins Winning % .333 > Raiders .286
13) Raiders Winning % .286 > Browns .143
14) Browns Conference winning % .200 > Chiefs .000
15) Chiefs Winning % .143 > Titans .000
16) Titans


Current Top of Draft Order:

1) Bucanneers (Winning % .000; Strength of Schedule .541)
2) Rams (Wins .000; SOS .599)
3) Titans (.000; .679)
4) Chiefs (.143; .333)
5) Browns (.143; .697)
6) Lions (.167; .679)
7) Redskins (.286; .289)
8) Raiders (.286; .595)
9) Carolina (.333; .449)
10) Seahawks (.333; .528)
11) Dolphins (.333; .694)
12) Bills (.429; .442)
13) Jaguars (.500; .429)
14) Chargers (.500; .496)
15) Ravens (.500; .512)
16) 49'ers (.500; .516)
17) Bears (.500; .544)
18) Texans (.571; .463)
19) Eagles (.667; .341)
20) Packers (.667; .397)

Naturally, this week you want the Packers to beat the vikings, Seahawks to beat the Cowboys, and it depends how ambitious a fan you are whether you want the Eagles to beat the Giants, and the Falcons to beat the Saints.

"CaliforniaCheez" wrote:



According to the rules, in the case of the four way tie, the head-to-head tiebreaker has to be a sweep of all teams involved or eliminating a team that lost to everyone else. Thus, Dallas' win over Atlanta is irrelevant in the four-way tie because they have not beaten either Green Bay or Philadelphia. NFL.com states that prior to doing any tie breaker, division ranking must be done to eliminate all but the highest ranked team in the division. Philadelphia ranks above Dallas in the division because Philly is 1-0 while Dallas is 0-1. Dallas would therefore be 8th.

The three way tie is then handled between Atlanta, Philly, and Green Bay. None have played each other, they have the same conference record, and they don't have four common opponents. Thus, we go to strength of schedule. Consequently, the Falcons would be 5th, Green Bay 6th, and Philly 7th.


http://www.nfl.com/standings 
http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures 

Three or More Clubs

(Note: If two clubs remain tied after third or other clubs are eliminated, tie breaker reverts to step 1 of applicable two-club format.)

1. Apply division tie breaker to eliminate all but the highest ranked club in each division prior to proceeding to step 2. The original seeding within a division upon application of the division tie breaker remains the same for all subsequent applications of the procedure that are necessary to identify the two Wild-Card participants.
2. Head-to-head sweep. (Applicable only if one club has defeated each of the others or if one club has lost to each of the others.)
3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.
5. Strength of victory.
6. Strength of schedule.
7. Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed.
8. Best combined ranking among all teams in points scored and points allowed.
9. Best net points in conference games.
10. Best net points in all games.
11. Best net touchdowns in all games.
12. Coin toss

When the first Wild-Card team has been identified, the procedure is repeated to name the second Wild-Card, i.e., eliminate all but the highest-ranked club in each division prior to proceeding to step 2. In situations where three or more teams from the same division are involved in the procedure, the original seeding of the teams remains the same for subsequent applications of the tie breaker if the top-ranked team in that division qualifies for a Wild-Card berth.


Born and bred a cheesehead
CaliforniaCheez
15 years ago
You are right mi_keys. My mistake was doing too much on Sunday and not waiting for the Monday Night game to run data completely.
That was an oversight on my part.

As promised on Sunday I have edited my information.
Thanks for calling me on that as I want to be accurate.
blank
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Hey Cheez?

I was thinking. Tuesday morning ya update the original post with your hard work.

I delete all previous posts so we only discuss the latest seedings?


Repeat this every week?
UserPostedImage
CaliforniaCheez
15 years ago
Why not let me post a new thread each week in the main forum like I wanted originally?

Nostopdrivel was against having a thread a week. He moved it here. He wanted to see the changes from week to week.

Now you want to delete all the previous stuff because the thread is too large and cumbersome.

Well I told everyone that I was against having one large thread when this thread was moved here. But I had no say in the matter.

Now you are begining to see my point of view and but want to delete everything.

If the weekly title only changes with the number of the NFL week threads can be searched if somone wanted to see the changes over the season.

If you want to keep a clean thread with current data let it be a weekly thread. Originally I just was doing the NFC in Packer discussion.

If you want to keep this thread out of the Packer Forum and want to delete it go ahead. It will near worthless next wekk.

I don't know what your issues here are with storage space and limiting the number of threads originally and now wanting to limit the size of a thread.

I don't understand why no one listened to me before.
blank
Zero2Cool
15 years ago

Why not let me post a new thread each week in the main forum like I wanted originally?

"CaliforniaCheez" wrote:



I've explained this already.

I'll take the lack of answering the question asked as a no.

Thanks for posting this. Pretty neat.


Why not let me post a new thread each week in the main forum like I wanted originally?

Nostopdrivel was against having a thread a week. He moved it here. He wanted to see the changes from week to week.

Now you want to delete all the previous stuff because the thread is too large and cumbersome.

Well I told everyone that I was against having one large thread when this thread was moved here. But I had no say in the matter.

Now you are begining to see my point of view and but want to delete everything.

If the weekly title only changes with the number of the NFL week threads can be searched if somone wanted to see the changes over the season.

If you want to keep a clean thread with current data let it be a weekly thread. Originally I just was doing the NFC in Packer discussion.

If you want to keep this thread out of the Packer Forum and want to delete it go ahead. It will near worthless next wekk.

I don't know what your issues here are with storage space and limiting the number of threads originally and now wanting to limit the size of a thread.

I don't understand why no one listened to me before.

"CaliforniaCheez" wrote:



Wow.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
15 years ago
Want my opinion.. too bad your getting it.

Why not make it a front page article... it will only help drive traffic, weekly it will spurn discussions and best of all.. it will add another component to the front page flow.

My two cents..
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
15 years ago
Not everything I think of is gold, often times it's poop and that is why I asked for input.

I like the idea of being able to chronicled see the progression. Although now that I've agreed with Cheez on that aspect, his motivation to disagree most everything done here, will change his tune. lol

I think pack93z idea is the best one. A weekly post on the front page would be the most excellent.

Also, I've taken the time to split each week's post.

Cheez, I'm tired of you questioning things so just do it however you'd like to.
UserPostedImage
mi_keys
15 years ago

You are right mi_keys. My mistake was doing too much on Sunday and not waiting for the Monday Night game to run data completely.
That was an oversight on my part.

As promised on Sunday I have edited my information.
Thanks for calling me on that as I want to be accurate.

"CaliforniaCheez" wrote:



Not a problem. There's so many rules and intricacies it must be a pain in the ass to put everything in order so thank you for doing it
Born and bred a cheesehead
RedSoxExcel
15 years ago
Wow, look at some of these strength's of victories.

The bottom feeders are getting worse and worse. It would not surprise me to see multiple 0-16 teams this year.
blank
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : Zero, regarding Woodson, that'd why I find the timing with Williams peculiar
dfosterf (15-May) : Ryan Hall y'all does a great job of tracking thesr
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Fear not!! I planned to do 33mi bike ride tomorrow morning, so ... yeah
Zero2Cool (15-May) : We got some dark clouds and nasty winds right bout now.
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Madison they had hail 4pm.
dfosterf (15-May) : Sure looks like these tornadoes are headed towards Green Bay
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Woodson of Charles fame was reluctant and then loved it. that didn't really come out until post career
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : IE "We bought into the Bears and they let us down, we have no choice to seek alternatives"
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : Or that Williams and his family are preparing an exit ramp if they don't like how things are going in a few years
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : Either Williams thought it would make him look good (reluctant but then embraces the city and franchise)
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : I can only assume that the Williams camp agreed to cooperate with that article tells me 2 things
dfosterf (15-May) : Ya. They are in a great mood
Zero2Cool (15-May) : I should visit again
dfosterf (15-May) : ChiCity Sports entering freakout mode due to Caleb and his dad not wanting him to go there
Zero2Cool (15-May) : "He's looking really good out there," Derrick Ansley said of Kalen King. Adds that he's been playing inside and out.
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Him saying he doesn't have one to give haha
Zero2Cool (15-May) : True, that was awesome. The whole F thing was great actually.
dfosterf (15-May) : I did like the Mark Murphy part, sorta
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Some comments on it saying it was great, amazing... I came away thinking... awkward.
dfosterf (15-May) : Packers schedule release video is "interesting" I guess.
Zero2Cool (15-May) : SOOO glad that tool still works. Saves from manually entering each game
Zero2Cool (15-May) : NFL Pick'em import was done last night.
Mucky Tundra (15-May) : Atlanta with 5 primetime games lol
Zero2Cool (15-May) : Week Five BYE?? NFL is hell.
wpr (14-May) : Vikings schedule leaked. Week 12 in GB. Week 18 in MN.
wpr (14-May) : CBS has GB @ NYG Week 11 Nov 16 and they will face MN in week 18 but don't say where. I think away
Zero2Cool (14-May) : W15: Packers at Broncos
Zero2Cool (14-May) : Ben Sirmans on MarShawn Lloyd: “Everything’s full go for him.”
Zero2Cool (14-May) : Luke Butkus says training camp will allow plenty of time to implement new center Elgton Jenkins
Zero2Cool (14-May) : wk 2 commanders at packers
Zero2Cool (14-May) : Ugh. Packers thanksgiving detroit ...boring
Zero2Cool (14-May) : Panthers at Green Bay in week 9, Nov 2nd
buckeyepackfan (14-May) : Week 1
buckeyepackfan (14-May) : Packers Host Detroit Week 1! ML finally gets a week home opener.
beast (13-May) : I was kind of hoping Douglas might come back to the Pack
beast (13-May) : My question is how much do we trust Jenkins? In bad weather, he seemed to struggle a bit with ball control snapping, though he started at OG
beast (13-May) : Well Jenkins probably knows he's not getting that 2026 salary number without a new contact... so just trying to get the new contact early
Zero2Cool (13-May) : CB Rasul Douglas is visiting the #Seahawks today, per source.
dfosterf (13-May) : He's a switch and baiter. Its the same as a bait and switcher except he agreed to the switch first lol
dfosterf (13-May) : 6.8 mil raise next year. Those are existing contract numbers
dfosterf (13-May) : 12.8 plus 4.8 pro rata signing bonus is 17.6 mil. Top center in the league at 18
Zero2Cool (13-May) : Elgton Jenkins wants to rework contract ahead of position change to center
Zero2Cool (13-May) : 🏈Monday, Nov. 10: Eagles at Packers
buckeyepackfan (12-May) : Packers @ Bears week 16(Saturday Game)
Zero2Cool (12-May) : Clifford hasn't been the same since losing 8
dfosterf (12-May) : Sean Clifford would probably disagree
dfosterf (12-May) : Canuck Cannon. Got a very good feeling about this
Zero2Cool (12-May) : Tom Pelissero also reports what bboy stated
bboystyle (12-May) : The Green Bay Packers on Monday signed Taylor Elgersma, the Canadian-born quarterback who tried out at the team’s rookie camp last weekend
beast (12-May) : There were reports four days ago that the Packers were signing QB Taylor Elgersma, but no official action since
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

15-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / greengold

15-May / Random Babble / Martha Careful

15-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

15-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

14-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / nyrpack

13-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

13-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

12-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.