Jennings· Page 4 · PACKERSHOME

Cheesey
Preferred Member

15 years ago

So early on Driver is getting the touches. That will make teams focus on him more, and guess what that will do?
Open it up for Jennings. By the end of the season, we will need both of them, and it will probably even out.
And really, as long as we are moving the ball and scoring, who cares WHICH of our guys is getting it done? We're getting it done, and thats ALL that matters.

ILikeThePackers39
Registered

15 years ago

#32

Seriously? We're on Jennings now? Gregorious?

Damn, y'all.

"pack93z" wrote:

Come on now.. I don't think anyone is "on" Jennings.. more or less trying to explain why his numbers are down.. nothing more.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:

I don't know... someone's already posted that they don't think he's a legit #1 WR - slippery slope around these parts, win or no.

And to be accurate, only you and a couple others have offered up reasons that don't have to do with some lack on his part. And to worry about his attitude? Of course he's frustrated - he should be, and I'm okay with that. Shows he's still got the passion to excel.

I'll worry about Jennings when there's something to worry about. Just my own opinion.

blank

doddpower
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#33

Seriously? We're on Jennings now? Gregorious?

Damn, y'all.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:

Come on now.. I don't think anyone is "on" Jennings.. more or less trying to explain why his numbers are down.. nothing more.

"pack93z" wrote:

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:

I don't think any of us are freaking out or anything like that. We just want to see our man Jennings continue to tear up the NFL! And when he's not, a discussion will come up trying to figure out exactly what's going on. After all, that's what these online communities are for.

I've always wondered how Jennings would hold up to being a number 1 receiver. I imagined he would struggle a bit at times. However, I'm not that concerned because we have enough talented receivers that force defenses to respect them all or get burned. That's awesome!

=)

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#34

If we were on pace for 1000 yards passing, or were not able to move the ball, maybe there would be something to worry about. Nothing has changed, Jennings is playing the same position as last year, and so is Driver. #1 is just a title people give to the top producing WR. If that is from the slot or where ever, if that is was the TE I wouldn't care. As long as we are moving the ball, and scoring points.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

doddpower
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#35

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:

Ultimately I agree with you, however, I would still like to see my man Jennings tearing it up.

Let's be honest, who here wouldn't!!

Pack93z
Select Member

15 years ago

#36

Personally and honestly, I like the balance that we have currently.. 50% to the wides.. 33% to the TE's and the remaining to the backs.. balance like that will keep the defense very honest..

Remember the graphic they put up Sunday.. we are the most "explosive" offense in the league.. meaning we score in the fewest average plays.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#37

"doddpower" wrote:

Ultimately I agree with you, however, I would still like to see my man Jennings tearing it up.

Let's be honest, who here wouldn't!!

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:

IMO all that Jennings tearing it up would do is switch the talk from Jennings to whether Driver is losing a step. Same talk different WR.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

doddpower
Veteran Member

15 years ago

#38

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:

Ultimately I agree with you, however, I would still like to see my man Jennings tearing it up.

Let's be honest, who here wouldn't!!

"doddpower" wrote:

IMO all that Jennings tearing it up would do is switch the talk from Jennings to whether Driver is losing a step. Same talk different WR.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:

I wish for the Arizona Cardinals "Trifecta!" I want Jennings, Driver, and another guy, maybe Finley or James Jones to all have 1000+ yards. Yeeeah, that would be nice.

But honestly, I'd hope for continued improvement in the running game. I'm not totally convinced yet considering we just played the Browns. I'm looking forward to seeing what our running game can do again the Queens.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

15 years ago

#39

Let's be honest, who here wouldn't!!

"doddpower" wrote:

I couldn't care less who is getting the catches, as long as Aaron Rodgers is throwing touchdowns.

zombieslayer
Registered

15 years ago

#40

My point exactly. Yards, catches, all that crap is irrelevant. In the end of the day, we want an O that puts up more points than our D allows.

So a 30+ TD season is more important than 4000+ yards passing.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (11h) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?

beast (11h) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach

Zero2Cool (21h) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one

Zero2Cool (21h) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.

dfosterf (23h) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you

wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.

wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.

wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious

beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere

beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.

beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.

beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...

beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered

wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.

wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.

wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet

beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury

beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State

beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE

packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome

Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.

Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.

Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?

Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22