Great players play hurt. Period. It's a Lombardi thing.
As I said yesterday, the fact that Raji was scratched indicates to me that Mike looked past the Bengals. If you haven't recognized that much, then you're unfit to comment on Packer football. Look for truth.
You site owners and Mods need to pull your head's out of your collective asses before it's too late. Influence that.
You just watched an embarrasment. Doesn't that piss you off? You have a responsibility as media (and that's exactly what you are) to hold this team's feet to the fire, and yet you constantly are presenting apologies on behalf of the coach and GM.
Grow some stones and write some truth!
"oskarliminga" wrote:
I agree, great players play hurt. 100% agree. There's a difference between being injured and hurt.
Wow, you are one helluva an asshole. I like it. :)
See, I want to be nice with my response, but gosh, saying I'm unfit to comment on Packer football, I think foregoes that notion.
Site Owners? Wait, there's more than one? I'm getting stiffed on the bills dammit!!
I'm media now? I think you're sadly mistaken, buddy. I don't get paid a nickel to ... wait ... are you saying I'm soo talented I should be getting paid? Was that compliment in hiding? Thank you sir!!
Yes, the embarrassment pisseD me off but I'm not going to be a complete ignorant self centered bitch about it like some people. We lost, it sucks, but it wasn't because Raji wasn't limping around the field further damaging his ankle.
Did the coach look past the Bengals? I can't say he didn't. I do know that Raji's ankle was sore and he was running with a limp. If Raji had played and got injured further, you'd be first in line to bash the coach for playing him against a team we should have beat without him.
Your post was fun, out of line, inaccurate, but fun. Thanks.