digsthepack
15 years ago
Colledge?? Are you kidding me?? You could make that case several years ago, Rockmolder Last year he was a very consistent player, and probably the best lineman day in day out. Did he get beat at times? Yep....but so does every lineman in the NFL.

If you choose to dwell on the highlight reels where he gets beat, and ignore the many times he was sustaining blocks, picking up blitzes, and downfield laying down a block for our running game for extra yards...well, you might feel this way.

Granted, the guy got off to a rocky start with the position change and transition to the NFL, but you seem to be judging his past years performance clouded by his early struggles.
State Motto: "Wisconsin, our serial murderers eat their kill!"
Rockmolder
15 years ago
First of all, I'm no O-line expert. I'm not as deep into it as Pack93 is for instance. To me, though, Colledge's play was average at best. He wasn't as bad as Moll and something could be said for Barbre as well. I'm just naming a few.

Just look at some of the games and pay attention to the O-line. Half the time the DE gets to the QB, because Clifton can't seem to make that fast kick-slide anymore and his presses seem to be less effective and half the time the pocket just collapses because of pressure on the inside. Big DTs can just run over our guys way too easily and ahile DTs just seem to pass them.
dfosterf
15 years ago
This has not been anything close to a cohesive unit. I am not 100% certain of the reasons why, though I have addressed some of them in some threads in the past. I personally find it extremely frustrating, and hope that this is the year that this unit finally gets it's act together.

I have suspicions about some of the problems, including being very wary of Chad Clifton, as an example. I would say that Colledge had his best year overall so far last year...That is NOT saying I thought it was satisfactory to my mind.

I think I could say that about all of them.

I'm the guy that a huge piece of me just wanted to dedicate the whole GD draft to the offensive line. I recognized that this was not possible, and also am pleased with our draft, but my sentiment is reflective of my total lack of satisfaction with these personnel to date. I keep waiting for this nonsense to change, but it hasn't happened. Z said since '07? He is getting older, apparently, and is leaving out a year there, imo. at least from my recollection, but I am getting real old comparatively, so never mind this part if I am mistaken.

We might be "deep", but unfortunately it just seems to me that there is little discernible difference between the various pieces of the puzzle, at least consistently. A dominant offensive line is of paramount importance to a consistent play-off caliber team, or a team that can "hang" with any other in the NFL, with very few exceptions.

Handwriting was on the wall for me in the Cowboys game last year. I knew we were done for the year right there and then, and I blame the trench play.

While everyone covets those highly visible "skill-position" players, both through FA and the draft, I submit that the best way to showcase any of those skill position folk is to make damn sure your trench people put them in a position to do so. My feeling is that we have been rolling with the complete opposite, on both sides of the LOS, and whatever successes we have achieved in recent years has been in spite of the LOS play, not because of it. '07 DL for a good chunk of year excepted.
Pack93z
15 years ago

Z said since '07? He is getting older, apparently, and is leaving out a year there, imo. at least from my recollection, but I am getting real old comparatively, so never mind this part if I am mistaken.

"dfosterf" wrote:



Yes.. I gave them (Colledge, Spitz and Moll) a free pass that season being it was horseshit to expect 3 rookies to start along the line in the first place.

In 07.. they would play one very good game followed up by a disappointment.. last season.. they had less downs but still were a streaky bunch..

IMO.. we should have maybe thought about replacing the OL coaching staff along with Winston Moss.... yes I still am a bit skeptical. :lol:
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
DakotaT
15 years ago
I think we are going to have a more physical line this year, especially on the right side with Sitton taking over at RG. I am really curious about the RT battle in training camp. I would like to see Lang win out, but if Babre is the better guy than he should play it.

In a perfect world, at center we should raid someone else's team. I really don't like any of our candidates, and couldn't believe we didn't take one in the draft. I think Wells is too small and with a trunk injury nevertheless. I guess Spitz will be the man.

I'm fine with College at LG, and have changed my mind about him taking over at LT someday. College should stay put.

I agree that this is Clifton's last year. In Minnesota last year he got used worse than one of those Amsterdam hookers (nice metaphor by the way). I would maybe do a 2 year extension for Clifton depending upon how successful his knee surgery was. I'm holding out high hopes for Meredith.

The O-line should be better this year, but it's time to spend some high draft picks on it.

And lastly, Tony Moll should be sent packing in the first round of cuts. All he is is a fat tight end.
UserPostedImage
Blank402
15 years ago

Colledge?? Are you kidding me?? You could make that case several years ago, Rockmolder Last year he was a very consistent player, and probably the best lineman day in day out. Did he get beat at times? Yep....but so does every lineman in the NFL.

If you choose to dwell on the highlight reels where he gets beat, and ignore the many times he was sustaining blocks, picking up blitzes, and downfield laying down a block for our running game for extra yards...well, you might feel this way.

Granted, the guy got off to a rocky start with the position change and transition to the NFL, but you seem to be judging his past years performance clouded by his early struggles.

"digsthepack" wrote:



Yeah, Colledge had a great year last year. Unfortunately, hardly anyone seems to have noticed.
blank
15 years ago
I think you all are missing the point.

There was this thing called zone blocking and the coach wanted smaller faster O-linemen who could dive at the opponents legs.

Different from the Wahle and Rivera days.

It didn't work so well.

With the drafting of Barbre and Sitton the line has been getting back to big guys and more traditional blocking.

If Spitz doesn't win the Center job then he will be on the bench. Tony Moll could be looking for work.

Ted has been willing to draft what the coaches want. Now life will be better after the zone blocking stuff is a bad memory.
blank
bozz_2006
15 years ago
yeah that zone ting didn't work out so well. I'm impressed with Colledge's progression and I've liked Spitz since he got here. I'm pretty high on Sitton and Barbre, so I hope they continue to improve.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
15 years ago


There was this thing called zone blocking and the coach wanted smaller faster O-linemen who could dive at the opponents legs.

"CaliforniaCheez" wrote:



That is the thing though.. we never truly converted to a Zone concept.. instead we were some place in the middle. We tried the "isolation" concept of zone without cutting or chopping.

Personally, having been through camps and seasons running into teams or players that cut.. I hated playing against it, your lower body felt it for days. Every want to piss a player off, go for his knees, so I am glad we as a team chose to abandon the practice.

However, the zone concept isn't real effective if you can't isolate the player; especially when you watch our guys get to high in their stance and play on their heels instead of their balls of their feet..
Mike McCarthy announced they aren't going to shift players all over the place.. which will help, but he denounced the theory that they are changing blocking concepts.. which I hope is a bluff... and they actually get back to good old fashion kick the defenders ass out of the hole concept..

Look, all offensive lineman get beat, that is a reality. The defender is going to win his share of the battles, that is life in the trenches. However, if as an offensive lineman you aren't using proper technique and lose a greater share than you should with proper technique.. then I have an issue.

Consistently use proper technique and fundamentals; as a fan I won't get riled up if you lose the battle because the opponent beat you.

But help him out by not doing the basics correctly, then you bet I am going to piss and moan about it..

That is simply my stance and opinion.. and you can praise Colledge all you want and ignore the fact that in about a 1/3 of the plays he fires out to high and lets the opponent under his pads.. that is fine too. When he plays with proper technique he is a fine player, at tackle I think he would excel in this league.. but as a guard you got to use leverage consistently.. and that is what I see when I watch the kid play. A player that loses focus on the basics for stretches of plays.. and it irritates me to no end. The guy could be a stud on the line if he would get out of his own way at times.. now I don't think he "sucks" or any of that nonsense.. in fact I think he could be a second coming of a Wahle type player if he can just pick it up a notch in focus and intensity.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
beast
15 years ago

Colledge?? Are you kidding me?? You could make that case several years ago, Rockmolder Last year he was a very consistent player, and probably the best lineman day in day out. Did he get beat at times? Yep....but so does every lineman in the NFL.

If you choose to dwell on the highlight reels where he gets beat, and ignore the many times he was sustaining blocks, picking up blitzes, and downfield laying down a block for our running game for extra yards...well, you might feel this way.

Granted, the guy got off to a rocky start with the position change and transition to the NFL, but you seem to be judging his past years performance clouded by his early struggles.

"Blank402" wrote:



Yeah, Colledge had a great year last year. Unfortunately, hardly anyone seems to have noticed.

"digsthepack" wrote:



I'll say Colledge looked very good. I'm not gonna say great yet. First off you'll were talking about consistent which seem to be Colledge biggest weakness and getting his pads low.

Sometime Colledge looks like one of the best OGs in the NFL... some time he looks average. I'd say he had more great then average plays this last year but I wouldn't say he was great yet but he was one of the better OG I think.
UserPostedImage
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Martha Careful (17h) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
    Martha Careful (17h) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
    Mucky Tundra (20h) : Rude!
    beast (21h) : Martha? 😋
    Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
    dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
    beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
    Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
    Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
    beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
    beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
    wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
    wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
    wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
    Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
    Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
    beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
    beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
    beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
    beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
    beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
    wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
    wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
    wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
    Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
    beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
    beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
    beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
    Eagles
    Recent Topics
    7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    17h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.