I think we've known all along the Rams are for sale; I've been saying it since last November. What Bernie Miklasz disclosed Sunday in his St. Louis Post-Dispatch column that was of interest to me was the the desire to sell is so strong now that the current owners won't force the new owner to keep the team in St. Louis. So it's open season on the Rams, and a billionaire could probably bring them to Los Angeles now.Although I'm told the league really wants the Rams to stay in the Midwest, it wouldn't be a disaster if they moved back home to Los Angeles. This is one franchise that can be moved without upsetting any competitive applecart. The Rams in the NFC West always were a bit of a stretch. But a Seattle-San Francisco-L.A.-Arizona division makes much more sense than leaving the Rams in St. Louis.
Please let this happen.. So I don't have to hear anymore LA Vikings crap.. =/
"Formo" wrote:
So Formo..........how does "The Minnesota Rams" sound???LOLOL!!!
"Cheesey" wrote:
Rabble, rabble, rabbleThis is what you get when your team goes 6-10, and will be lucky to do even that well in 2009!Rabble, rabble, rabble
"vikesrule" wrote:
The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close