dhazer
  • dhazer
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
Now maybe you people will understand why i say we sign players this year from the free agent market and not worry about Jennings and Collins. Actually ironic that they have Jennings pictured for the story.

A general manager told me that the projections for players scheduled to be free agents -- if it were a capped year -- could be upwards of 170 fewer players if it is uncapped. Every player from the 2005 draft who signed a five-year contract and every player who signed a four-year deal in 2006 would miss out on eligibility for free agency and revert back to their club as a restricted free agent. Keep in mind, teams target this group over all others when it comes to spending the big money in free agency.





here is the rest of the story:

http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d808736ba&template=with-video&confirm=true 
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
bozz_2006
15 years ago
I read that a couple days ago. It would help us re-sign those guys, but a lack of salary cap would end up hurting the packers in the long run.
UserPostedImage
dhazer
  • dhazer
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
Well i was just bringing up this because alot of posters are making the comments of not being able to resign Jennings and Collins. We will get killed if they go a few years without a cap, we just don't have the money of the Jones and Synder and Davis's of the league.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
bozz_2006
15 years ago
yup.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
15 years ago
I just hope there will be a cap in place again soon. As much as this may help us, I still don't like it.

I love the parity (Got it right this time) in the NFL and I would hate for anything to change it. Now I don't know excactly how this works, but I don't want to look like the soccer leagues.
bozz_2006
15 years ago
soccer leagues will be what it looks like if owners/players can't negotiate a cap.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago
I hope and believe there will be no uncapped year. A reasonable, CBA agreement is best for both the teams/Owners and the players.

That being, Packers have a discretionary fund. That can be used if it comes down to an uncapped year. Last I heard that was about 250 million. While the Packers would not go on a spending spree, they would use it to keep players that the organization deems important.

If Jennings and Colins are not locked up prior, the team would have the means to retain them.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
bozz_2006
15 years ago
well yes, pfwt. but the point of the thread is that if 2010 is uncapped, Jennings and Collins won't be able to sign anywhere else, because in an uncapped year, a player cannot become an unrestricted free agent until after 6 years in the league. If next season is uncapped, they would become exclusive rights free agents, like Ryan Grant last year. He needed a new contract but it had to be with the packers.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
15 years ago
True, but the biggest worry facing uncapped years is can the Packers afford to keep up with the Joneses, or the Joneses and Snyders. If teams start paying their WR 20 million, Jennings is going to want that.

If it comes to that and the Packers need to tender Jennings, the result is going to make it that much more difficult to do a long term deal with him. Disgruntled players is not a good thing.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
shield4life
15 years ago
Bad for the NFL, bad for the owner's... Salary cap saved the NHL ... it could kill the NFL. I hate leagues with no salary cap, it's just not fair ... richest owner always have advantage.
Glad To Be A Packers Fan.
Fan Shout
beast (now) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (3m) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (4m) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (4m) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (5m) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (6m) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (9m) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (13m) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (14m) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (15m) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (24m) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (30m) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (32m) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (33m) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (35m) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (44m) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (50m) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (53m) : Packers will get in
beast (54m) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (59m) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (1h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (2h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (3h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (3h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (3h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (4h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (13h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (13h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (14h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (17h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!
wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.
beast (20-Dec) : As of tonight, 3 way tie for 2nd in Pick'em, that battle is interesting!
beast (20-Dec) : Lions vs Vikings could be the main last game as it could determine division winners or #1 vs #2 seed
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Or if KC needs to win for the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Right now it looks like the only prime worthy games are Det-Minny and KC-Denver (if Denver can clinch a wild card spot)
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : The entirety of week 18 being listed as flex is weird
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Matt LaFleur today says unequivocally "Ted Thompson had nothing to do with the drafting of Jordan Love."
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
6m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.