porky88
  • porky88
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago
1. Detroit Lions - Matthew Stafford, QB, Georgia
2. St. Louis Rams - Andre Smith, OT, Alabama
3. Kansas City Chiefs - Aaron Curry, LB, Wake Forest
4. Seattle Seahawks - Michael Crabtree, WR, Texas Tech
5. Cleveland Browns - Brian Orakpo, DE/LB, Texas
6. Cincinnati Bengals - Eugene Monroe, OT, Virginia
7. Oakland Raiders - Malcolm Jenkins, CB, Ohio State
8. Jacksonville Jaguars - Jeremy Maclin, WR, Missouri
9. Green Bay Packers - Aaron Maybin, DE/LB, Penn State
10. San Francisco 49ers - Mark Sanchez, QB, Southern California
11. Buffalo Bills - Everette Brown, DE, Florida State
12. Denver Broncos - B.J. Raji, NT, Boston College
13. Washington Redskins - Jason Smith, OT, Baylor
14. New Orleans Saints - Rey Maualuga, LB, Southern California
15. Houston Texans - Vontae Davis, CB, Illinois
16. San Diego Chargers - Knowshon Moreno, RB, Georgia
17. New York Jets - Brian Cushing, LB, Southern California
18. Chicago Bears - Darius Heyward-Bey, WR, Maryland
19. Tampa Bay Buccaneers - Peria Jerry, DT, Ole Miss
20. Detroit Lions - Michael Oher, OT, Ole Miss
21. Philadelphia Eagles - Chris Wells, RB, Ohio State
22. Minnesota Vikings - Percy Harvin, WR, Florida
23. New England Patriots - Alphonso Smith, CB, Wake Forest
24. Atlanta Falcons - Brandon Pettigrew, TE, Oklahoma State
25. Miami Dolphins - Tyson Jackson, DE, LSU
26. Baltimore Ravens - D.J. Moore, CB, Vanderbilt
27. Indianapolis Colts - James Laurinaitis, LB, Ohio State
28. Philadelphis Eagles - Eben Brittion, OT, Arizona
29. New York Giants - Hakeem Nicks, WR, North Carolina
30. Tennessee Titans - Michael Johnson, DE, Georgia Tech
31. Arizona Cardinals - LeSean McCoy, RB, Pittsburgh
32. Pittsburgh Steelers - Alex Mack, OL, California

Paragraph long explanations for each pick after you click the link.

2009 NFL Mock Draft 2.0 - Fantasy Football Jungle 
Rockmolder
15 years ago
That would be a risky pick and like said in the paragraph itsself, the Packers haven't had that much luck in the 1st round.

On the other side, AJ Hawk was the 'safest player in the draft' and he doesn't produce up to his Nr. 5 overal potential.

Anyway, I'd prefer Raji on that spot, or Ted Thompson has to know something about Harrell that we don't. If we'd go with a rushing LB though, I'd still prefer Brown. He has alot of potential as a real 3-4 LB coming of the edge. We'll just have to watch if either Kampman or Brown can at least cover a bit.

I also still don't like Sanchez going to the 49ers. I know it's the popular pick and one that has a big chance of happening, but still think they should go with Shaun Hill for at least a year. See what he can do if he start the entire season.

In their case, I would go with a WR or a DT most likely. If Raji is there like in this projection, I would take him. If Maclin is still there, I'd go for him aswell.
packer98
15 years ago
no thank you. Harrell had potential too. Maybin way to small right now, but does have potentail. I'd take Brown, Curry if available.
blank
go.pack.go.
15 years ago


I also still don't like Sanchez going to the 49ers. I know it's the popular pick and one that has a big chance of happening, but still think they should go with Shaun Hill for at least a year. See what he can do if he start the entire season.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



Just because they select Sanchez doesn't mean he will be a 1st year starter...he can back up Hill until he proves that he's better than Shaun.

Anyway, I just want a good rushing linebacker that can still cover well.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
15 years ago


I also still don't like Sanchez going to the 49ers. I know it's the popular pick and one that has a big chance of happening, but still think they should go with Shaun Hill for at least a year. See what he can do if he start the entire season.

"go.pack.go." wrote:



Just because they select Sanchez doesn't mean he will be a 1st year starter...he can back up Hill until he proves that he's better than Shaun.

Anyway, I just want a good rushing linebacker that can still cover well.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



I know he doesn't have to start directly, but it's still a pretty clear sign that they want to go to a new QB and with Shaun Hill being young, if he does turn out well, it's still a wasted pick and alot of money spent.
porky88
  • porky88
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
15 years ago

no thank you. Harrell had potential too. Maybin way to small right now, but does have potentail. I'd take Brown, Curry if available.

"packer98" wrote:



The likely hood of Curry being there is probably slim to none. I think Brown is definitely in the mix, but the upside on Maybin is obviously better.

Ted Thompson always drafts for potential. Harrell, Rodgers, and in a lot of ways Hawk.

Why would Thompson change up his philosophy?
Dulak
15 years ago
IMO they should take Brace in the 2nd round ... and take a good OLB in the first round ie brown or orakpo. Or jenkins if hes still available.

Just make sure they get a good OLB either via FA suggs? or the draft.
Rockmolder
15 years ago

IMO they should take Brace in the 2nd round ... and take a good OLB in the first round ie brown or orakpo. Or jenkins if hes still available.

Just make sure they get a good OLB either via FA suggs? or the draft.

"Dulak" wrote:



Now ofcourse I can't see how the players are progressing and adapting to the 3-4, but OLB doens't look like one of the biggest needs to me at this point.

Poppinga played some DE this season and is a very well-rounded OLB in a 3-4, I think. Kampman will play OLB and is obviously a great rusher. Chillar, I don't know, he seems to be more of a coverage guy. Hawk might move inside, but I'm pretty sure that Capers and Greene can get some of that college -getting in the backfield- mindset back, which would make him good for an outside LBer. Jeremy Thompson will move to OLB as a pure rusher, I asume.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for depth, but I don't think this is a position we should use such a high 1st rounder for, or Orakpo should fall all the way down to 9 ofcourse.

I'd still like a NT. I know the D-line doesn't have to be made out of huge guys, but I'd like to see something like Pickett - Raji - Jenkins as our starters. That would make quite an impact. Jolly can just move around on all the sides and Jenkins is still quite the pass rusher.

I wouldn't mind taking an OT aswell. There seem to be some great ones in this draft with alot of potential and I don't like the idea of Moll being our regular starter at a tackle spot for instance.
go.pack.go.
15 years ago
How about this as our starting DL.

DE - Jenkins
NT - Pickett/Raji
DE - Pickett/Raji

I think Pickett would do alright at DE. They could switch around sometimes. Or you could probably switch in Brace or Peria Jerry for Raji.
UserPostedImage
Yerko
15 years ago
I just want a DT drafted to play our NT position which is not vacant on the depth chart but vacant in terms of playing ability, toughness, heart etc etc. Get a rookie guy in who wants to be looked at as the big boy on the field. Let him make a name for himself.
BJ Raji or Peria Jerry.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (3h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (11h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (19h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
16m / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

28m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

15h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22h / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.