wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
10 months ago

This could mark the end of the league’s salary cap era, among other changes.

The NFL has been battling a major lawsuit over the past several months, one that involves their out-of-market game package: NFL Sunday Ticket. The argument was that the NFL violated antitrust laws with the package, due to the nature of out-of-market games being exclusively shown on Sunday Ticket.


On Thursday, a jury ordered the NFL to pay $96 million in damages to the commercial class, which includes the 48,000 businesses that paid for NFL Sunday Ticket from 2011 to 2022, and $4 billion to the residential class, which covers the 2.4 million residential subscribers of the package over the same period.


Because this was a federal antitrust case, $4 billion is allowed to balloon to $12 billion. For reference, the plaintiffs were asking for $21 billion in this case, so they could receive north of half of their requested number. Per Sportico , the NFL’s revenue last season was $19 billion, which means that if the $12 billion number sticks after a presumed series of appeals, it will almost certainly impact the league’s salary cap — at the very least.


Recently, Dallas Cowboys  owner Jerry Jones stated that he would actually be against a salary cap if teams were allowed to sell their individual out-of-market rights — which is almost assured to be part of the fallout of the NFL Sunday Ticket package. Get ready to hear a lot of that in the coming weeks, months and years, as owners of richer teams will likely try to make up the losses they’re taking in this lawsuit by blocking other clubs from revenue sharing.


Essentially, this case boiled down to whether the NFL’s antitrust exemptions for their broadcast applied to paid television, rather than just over-the-air broadcasts. Ultimately, the jury found in favor of the plaintiffs.


The league’s current television broadcast agreements run through 2033, but the NFL would likely have to renegotiate with FOX and CBS, their early and late game Sunday partners, if the structure of out-of-market broadcasts does change. For perspective, those two partners pay $4.3 million billion a year for their games while YouTube TV is dishing out $2 billion a year for NFL Sunday Ticket. To say the least, this will have a significant financial impact on the league.


Per a league memo that the Associated Press reported on , the NFL once looked at putting out-of-market Sunday games on cable television with FS1, ESPN, ESPN2, TBS, TNT, NFL Network and CBS Sports Network being landing spots. Under that structure, cable networks would have broadcast games at $9 million per game while FOX and CBS would have paid $10 million less per game.


So placing out-of-market games on cable would have been close to a break-even point with the league’s afternoon slate contracts, but it would have completely wiped out the $2 billion per year they currently receive for the NFL Sunday Ticket package. That is where individual teams selling their own out-of-market packages comes into play, along with Jerry Jones’ line of thought about how if there’s no revenue sharing with these out-of-market packages then there’s no incentive to have a salary cap in the league moving forward.




Continue Reading @ Justis Mosqueda 

Justis Mosqueda wrote:



I hope not. I had the sunday Ticket package with Direct Tv back in the day. This settlement isn't coming from NFL, Inc. It is coming from the teams. They will have a COVID like cap put on. (Only for a longer period of time.) They will raise ticket and concession prices. Merch will go up. Like everything else, the end consumer IE the fans will pay $ billion in the settlement not the league or the teams.


UserPostedImage
beast
10 months ago
PFT is guessing this means they'll push for 18 game seasons even more.


Though, the more I see this kind of case, the more I think the NFL could simply solve a lot of their issues by actually putting all teams legally under the NFL, and be one company, instead of 33 companies, with the 32 teams and the NFL, and then the owners could own a sub-franchise of the NFL instead of a different company.

Of course, owners would in theory have less control, therefore they would hate to do that, but the NFL basically has (in theory) control over all those things anyways but more indirectly.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
10 months ago
Aaron Nagler and Andrew Brandt discuss the verdict.




UserPostedImage
dfosterf
9 months ago
Today is the scheduled day for motions in this case. The range of outcomes is rather wide at between nothing and over 14 billion in damages.
beast
9 months ago

Today is the scheduled day for motions in this case. The range of outcomes is rather wide at between nothing and over 14 billion in damages.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 


Or... the judge throws the entire case out, because the judge disagrees with the plaintiffs economics experts and disagrees with how the jury came up with their amount, which I'm assuming was based on the disliked economic experts and also assume the judge told the jury to ignore them, and they listened to them anyways, and therefore threw the entire case out.

That, or the NFL got into the judges pocket...

Because as PFT points out, the judge found that there was proof of antitrust violations, he just didn't agree with how they came up with the amount for punishment, and the judge could of ordered a new trail, or other methods to keep it moving forward, but instead, he just threw the entire thing out.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
9 months ago

Or... the judge throws the entire case out, because the judge disagrees with the plaintiffs economics experts and disagrees with how the jury came up with their amount, which I'm assuming was based on the disliked economic experts and also assume the judge told the jury to ignore them, and they listened to them anyways, and therefore threw the entire case out.

That, or the NFL got into the judges pocket...

Because as PFT points out, the judge found that there was proof of antitrust violations, he just didn't agree with how they came up with the amount for punishment, and the judge could of ordered a new trail, or other methods to keep it moving forward, but instead, he just threw the entire thing out.

Originally Posted by: beast 



Interesting. I thought it would have to go to a higher court before getting tossed.
UserPostedImage
beast
9 months ago

Interesting. I thought it would have to go to a higher court before getting tossed.

Originally Posted by: wpr 


The decision to toss the case, like most decisions is "subject to appeal".

And with this much money at stake, and the proof being there that a violation did happen, it's surely going to be appealed.

The question is now, "What, if anything, will the appeals court do?"


I know nothing about courts, and what the options are, but I'm very surprised that the judge tossed the entire case. I don't know if this is an option or not, but I would have thought he would of tried to keep the guilty verdict (or the civil case equivalent), but only tossed the damages amount verdict l, which I believe I have heard happen in criminal cases against people, so I assume it's also allowed in civil cases against companies, but that is an assumption, and I do know there are a lot of difference between criminal and civil courts.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (2h) : My first name starts with R and my beer belly is quite voluptuous! Thank you for noticing 😏
Zero2Cool (6h) : beast, you're just one R from being voluptuous.
Zero2Cool (6h) : And now some Packers blogger is like Doubs to Steelers makes sense!!!!
Zero2Cool (6h) : You saw me Tweet???
beast (6h) : Supposedly Steelers will be trading WR George Pickens to the Cowboys for a 3rd and late round pick swap
Zero2Cool (5-May) : Ravens release Justin Tucker, err D. Watson Jr?
Zero2Cool (5-May) : Cardinals have signed TE Josiah Deguara.
Zero2Cool (5-May) : If I were to "Google" it, then I wouldn't read it in your words.
Martha Careful (5-May) : Yes, in the military S2’s work on IPB, PERCEC, PHYSEC and IO
dfosterf (4-May) : FYI civilian companies swipe the S2 designation from the military. S2 is the intelligence branch up to brigade level. G2 is division level.
dfosterf (4-May) : Google it. Make sure to tack NFL on it or you will get the military meaning
Zero2Cool (4-May) : S2?
beast (4-May) : Seems like the S2 has a love/hate relationship with professional scouts.
beast (4-May) : In theory, the S2 test how quickly a QBs brain can solve game like issues and how quickly they can do it.
dfosterf (4-May) : Are you gentlemen and at least one lady familiar with the S2 cognition
Zero2Cool (4-May) : Maybe there isn't an issue.
beast (4-May) : NFL really needs to fix their position labeling issue, but I don't think they care
Zero2Cool (1-May) : Packers did not activate the fifth-year options for linebacker Quay Walker, with the goal of signing him to a contract extension.
Zero2Cool (1-May) : Matthew Golden spoke with Randall Cobb before draft. Looked like chance encounter.
packerfanoutwest (1-May) : from a head left turn?
packerfanoutwest (1-May) : someone drunk?
Zero2Cool (1-May) : Unlikely.
dfosterf (30-Apr) : How long until Jeff Sperbeck's family sues John Elway ?
Zero2Cool (30-Apr) : Packers are exercising the fifth-year option on DT Devonte Wyatt, locking in a guaranteed $12.9M for the 2026 season.
beast (30-Apr) : Sounds like P Luke Elzinga has a rookie try out opportunity from the Titans
dfosterf (30-Apr) : Luke Elzinga Punter Oklahoma stil unsigned. Green Bay has been mentioned as good fit
beast (30-Apr) : The Packers re-signed three exclusive rights free agents WR Melton, P Whelan and RB Wilson.
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : February 5, 2002 (age 23) ok no. packers.com is wrong
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : Micah Robinson is only 19??
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : 6 first rounders on Packers defense now
Zero2Cool (29-Apr) : LB Isaiah Simmons. Signed. Called it!!! Oh yeah!
Martha Careful (29-Apr) : ty bboystyle...fat fingers
bboystyle (29-Apr) : Tom*
Martha Careful (28-Apr) : RIP Packer Safety Tim Brown
beast (27-Apr) : Yeah, but also some of the wording suggestions Jax only pranked called the QB, not the others... and if he had an open spreadsheet & 3 calls
beast (27-Apr) : Thank goodness he's not leaving the Turtle in the Red Tide
Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : Cowboys 1st round pick Tyler Booker will indeed be bringing his pet turtle to Dallas with him
Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : that contained all prospects info and contact
Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : beast, according the Falcons statement Jax came across it on an ipad. If I had to guess, probably an open spread sheet or something
Zero2Cool (27-Apr) : Simmons put up an emoji with cheese.
beast (27-Apr) : Not sure anyone is interested in Isaiah Simmons... Collin Oliver might of taken his potential slot
beast (27-Apr) : I'm going with Jax Ulbrich is not telling the whole truth... he accidentally came across it? Why would a defensive coordinator have a QB #?
Zero2Cool (27-Apr) : He's not that great, but final piece of the script.\
Zero2Cool (27-Apr) : If we add Isaiah Simmons, book your Super Bowl tickets
Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : Colts 1st round TE Tyler Warren also got prank called, was that Jax Ulbrich as well?
Zero2Cool (27-Apr) : Jax Ulbrich, Jeff Ulbrich’s son, released an apology for his role in the Shedeur Sanders prank call.
Martha Careful (27-Apr) : apparently he did not participate in practice or play on the east west shrine game nor the NFL combine. The kid was a mediocre spoiled brat
Mucky Tundra (27-Apr) : Yeah that one that was a super wounded duck that Sanders supporters are highlighting to prove a point
Zero2Cool (27-Apr) : Shough is the guy who missed guys at combine isn't he?
beast (27-Apr) : It's not official until I'm dead! I have a chance still! (Not really)
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

5-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

4-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3-May / Packers Draft Threads / Martha Careful

3-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

2-May / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.