nerdmann
a year ago

Really frustrating game. Frustrating because I think this is one the Packers should have had based on what we saw on the field. The backwards pass that Packers recovered really loomed large. So did that blocked extra point.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


Packers were less attacked by the refs than in the last couple weeks. Also, guys are starting to run the correct routes, and with consistency. Things might be looking better.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
umair_010
a year ago

Packers were less attacked by the refs than in the last couple weeks. Also, guys are starting to run the correct routes, and with consistency. Things might be looking better.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Yea I just wish we won this one because we would at least have a chance for a playoff run.
umair_010
a year ago
Let's not forget to mention how awful the run defense was.
Zero2Cool
a year ago

Let's not forget to mention how awful the run defense was.

Originally Posted by: umair_010 


Run defense either stopped them quick or got hosed fir huge gain. Quite maddening. Not sure why Steelers even passed it.
UserPostedImage
beast
a year ago

Run defense either stopped them quick or got hosed fir huge gain. Quite maddening. Not sure why Steelers even passed it.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 


As the announcer stated, Packers have been heavily slanting one direction, to get more pressure on the backfield.

Basically it becomes a chess match of which direction, if the offense guesses right, huge gain, if they guess wrong, nothing.

Packers are still trying to get more and more like the Rams old defense, but they still don't have the DTs inside for it, and there aren't many Aaron Donald's in NFL history.

Though the Vic Fangio defenses has has done well a lot of other places, but still, it helps the DBs and hurts the DL and you need a dominant DL for it (or have the opponents chasing) and the Packers just don't right now.


I assume the Steelers pass the ball because the Packers lined up super heavy against the run.
UserPostedImage
go.pack.go.
a year ago

After the end of the game, someone was hitting Tom while he was on the ground, on the sideline, after making the tackle.

IMO, that someone needs to be suspended.

Tom was just tackling the returners, whom didn't have to return the ball...

Originally Posted by: beast 



I saw that. I think Tom may have hit him a little late but that still doesn’t warrant what the retaliation was.

I’m pretty sure I heard the ref at the end of the game call a personal foul on #74 which would be Jenkins. Not sure if they had the number wrong or if Jenkins actually did something.
UserPostedImage
beast
a year ago

I saw that. I think Tom may have hit him a little late but that still doesn’t warrant what the retaliation was.

I’m pretty sure I heard the ref at the end of the game call a personal foul on #74 which would be Jenkins. Not sure if they had the number wrong or if Jenkins actually did something.

Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 



I saw a reply and it looked better than I originally thought...

Tom pushed the Steelers INT return guy out maybe a step late, and he got thrown into a Steelers coach. And looked like the main part was 100% Tom and that Steelers player.

Tom then slipped and went down, and the Steelers player got up and was shoving Tom back down as he tried to get up...

Other Steelers players did the right thing, didn't get involved with Tom, did get involved with their own guy.

Other Packers came over to get Tom, whom looked awkward getting up, and lost his balance, and I was wondering if he maybe had a concussion or just simply lost his balance, then a Packers player helped keep him up and he seemed alright after being held a bit.


Jenkins came over, SEMI late, seemingly ready to throw down if needed, but found peace and calm and he relaxed.

Then of all people, the helmet-less Kicker grabbed Jenkins from behind horsecollar (seemingly for no reason) and dragged him away from the Steelers.

Jenkins not knowing who or why it was done (again, everyone was calm by that point) was agitated and other Steelers came over to help the kicker (kicker shouldn't be the one starting stuff).

The replay didn't stay in Jenkins and the Steelers long enough, to see the entire picture of what happened, but what it did show was minor shoving, but you know the second guy always gets called rule.



The 5 things I saw was
1) Tom pushed the man out of bounce a bit late, probably going to get a fine.

2) Innocent Coach took the worst of anything getting nailed by the Steelers INT return man.

3) Steelers INT return man, getting up and shoving Tom down as he's trying to get up off the ground. Should be fined for going attack someone already on the ground.

4) Kicker needlessly pulling Jenkins. I doubt he'll get fined.

5) Jenkins talking and shoving.... I could see them going either way on that, maybe see the ref called it, and camera picked it up, he'll be fined, though I think the Kicker saw Jenkins coming over, got out of the way and let him by. And only took issue after things were already calm and Jenkins back was turned and then he restarted things.
UserPostedImage
beast
a year ago
I saw the video again, and this one shows a lot more after the kicker pulled Jenkins off than the other one.



Looking over it again, I expect fines because NFL is very much into PR, and you got an old man getting nailed and pushing on the ground, but if the old man is alright, I'm not sure there should be any fines.

Tom touched the returner, but I can't tell if there was much force there or if the returner just slipped trying to avoid Tom, the coach and slow down. I think the returner has a right to be upset, but not shoving a guy that's already on the ground.

Great credit to majority of the Steelers bench for not getting involved in that, and the guy in all black for taking the Defender off Tom very quickly.

As for the Kicker/Jenkins, I think this video is much more telling, the Kicker avoided Jenkins on his way over, but then saw the ST coach being picked up off the ground and Jenkins right next to him, that's when the Kicker suddenly got his moxy, for his ST coach, the kicker actions now make sense.

But other than jaw jacking it looks like Jenkins and the Kicker stopped it there... while other small players rushed over to protect their guys and started pushing.

Looks like maybe Aaron Jones for the Packers and you can't see the Steelers numbers, but look similar sized.

But looks like Jenkins MIGHT be totally innocent.other than talking. Jones was trying to protect Jenkins, and other Steelers were trying to back up their kicker whom was trying to get room for the ST coach.

So to me it all makes sense and only some pushing, at the end. I'd just be looking at the start, Tom's push and the defender getting on top of him.
UserPostedImage
beast
a year ago
I just wanted to post that no matter what the refs say, that was clearly a lateral...



Also late in the game, I believe on 3rd and 2 around the 5 minutes left in the game mark, right before the Steelers kicked a FG, Steelers rolled right, Packers had it covered, Campbell was coming in for the sack, QB was looking, nothing was open, Campbell touched the QB, and with the QB clearly looking straight down baby tosses it forward, it does not make it back to the line of scrimmage.

If he got the ball past the line of scrimmage, then that's not intentional grounding, but he didn't... it was a baby toss that looked like it only made it 60% of the way back to the line to gain, which was maybe 5 to 7byards away...

So by rule, it all comes down to this part of the rule, if that's intentional grounding or not

"passing motion is significantly affected by physical contact from a defensive player that causes the ball to land short of the line of scrimmage."



So the ref can rightfully claim it's not intentional grounding due to Campbell being on top of him.

That being said....if you just watch it, that's 1,000% intentional grounding, the QB is looking down, and preparing to be hit, and trying to safely land, not trying to get the ball to anyone. That's giving up on the play and trying not to get hurt, when he could of just slid down but didn't.

Now, they probably make the FG anyways, but this isn't a Packers vs Steelers thing for me, it's an offense vs defense thing... the game is set up to favor the offense, the rules are already set up to favor the offense, the refs actions favor the offense, defensive players are too often screwed....

At minimum, Campbell deserves a sack or forced fumble stat on the play...

We fans should not know the rules better than the Refs... and we don't, but why aren't the refs enforcing the rules?

They have made it so much easier for the QB to throw the ball away, all he has to do is be outside the pocket and past the line of scrimmage... they made it simpler for the QBs, and they don't even have to do that, they just get a free pass...
UserPostedImage
go.pack.go.
a year ago

I just wanted to post that no matter what the refs say, that was clearly a lateral...



Also late in the game, I believe on 3rd and 2 around the 5 minutes left in the game mark, right before the Steelers kicked a FG, Steelers rolled right, Packers had it covered, Campbell was coming in for the sack, QB was looking, nothing was open, Campbell touched the QB, and with the QB clearly looking straight down baby tosses it forward, it does not make it back to the line of scrimmage.

If he got the ball past the line of scrimmage, then that's not intentional grounding, but he didn't... it was a baby toss that looked like it only made it 60% of the way back to the line to gain, which was maybe 5 to 7byards away...

So by rule, it all comes down to this part of the rule, if that's intentional grounding or not

So the ref can rightfully claim it's not intentional grounding due to Campbell being on top of him.

That being said....if you just watch it, that's 1,000% intentional grounding, the QB is looking down, and preparing to be hit, and trying to safely land, not trying to get the ball to anyone. That's giving up on the play and trying not to get hurt, when he could of just slid down but didn't.

Now, they probably make the FG anyways, but this isn't a Packers vs Steelers thing for me, it's an offense vs defense thing... the game is set up to favor the offense, the rules are already set up to favor the offense, the refs actions favor the offense, defensive players are too often screwed....

At minimum, Campbell deserves a sack or forced fumble stat on the play...

We fans should not know the rules better than the Refs... and we don't, but why aren't the refs enforcing the rules?

They have made it so much easier for the QB to throw the ball away, all he has to do is be outside the pocket and past the line of scrimmage... they made it simpler for the QBs, and they don't even have to do that, they just get a free pass...

Originally Posted by: beast 



Yes I was very surprised that Steratore agreed with the call. He’s usually spot on, but in this case he could not be more wrong. Very frustrating.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy 😂😂😂
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : I might be late on this but Aaron Rodgers is now married
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : Well he can always ask his brother for pointers
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : Bo Melton taking some reps at CB as well as WR
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : key transactions coming today at 3pm that will consume more cap in 2025
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jaire played in just 34 of a possible 68 games since the start of the 2021 season
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : reported, but not expected to practice
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jenkins has REPORTED for mandatory camp
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : I really thought he'd play for Packers.
buckeyepackfan (9-Jun) : Packers releasing Jaire Alexander.
Mucky Tundra (8-Jun) : (Context: he wants his defense to create turnovers)
Mucky Tundra (8-Jun) : Giants DC Shane Bowen tells players to “be a damn pirate."
dfosterf (6-Jun) : Semper fi !
Cheesey (6-Jun) : This is why I have so much respect for those that have gone through battles
Cheesey (6-Jun) : I can't even imagine what that would have been like
wpr (6-Jun) : "Come on, you sons of bitches. Do you want to live forever?"
wpr (6-Jun) : Facing a line of machine guns 2 time medal of Honor recipient, First Sergeant Dan Daly told his men,
wpr (6-Jun) : Another detachment went into the Belleau Wood.
wpr (6-Jun) : On the 6th the Marines took Hill 142 but suffered terrible losses.
wpr (6-Jun) : It’s time to remember dfoster’s Marine brothers in Belleau Wood. The battle went on from June 1-26. Nearly 10,000 casualties.
packerfanoutwest (6-Jun) : Nick Collins and Morgan Burnett have signed with the PACK
packerfanoutwest (6-Jun) : he won't be wearing #12, maybe he will wear number two
packerfanoutwest (6-Jun) : He will fail this season, should have retired
Mucky Tundra (5-Jun) : Thus the cycle of Hall of Fame Packer QBs going to the Jets and then the Vikings is broken
bboystyle (5-Jun) : Rodgers to steelers on 1 year contract
Zero2Cool (5-Jun) : It's the cycle of civilizations. Get lazier, lazier, softer, softer and vanish.
Martha Careful (5-Jun) : great point. every aspect of society, including art, culture and sports has degraded.
dfosterf (4-Jun) : Green Bay sweep meant something to society about stopping pure excellence. We have the tush push now
dfosterf (4-Jun) : We old Martha.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Adam

12-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

12-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.