Might #9 be a place to move down from?· Page 2

DakotaT
Select Member

16 years ago

Since Stafford, Bradford, McCoy or Tebow haven't declared at least yet, I have the Lions picking Jenkins at #1. Orakpo will go to the Chiefs at #3. I think we should take either Eugene Monroe or Michael Oher (depends which one is left) if we're looking OT, but Michael Johnson if we're looking DE. That is, if we don't trade down from #9, which I think we should do.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:

The only kind of defensive end I want drafted with a top ten pick is one the size of Mario Williams or Peppers. The top DE's this year are too light in the pants for my taste. Aren't you guys tired of getting run over? I think LT should be addressed, but I would not be heartbroken if we took a top corner, just not a smurf.

HoustonMatt
Registered

16 years ago

#12

The only kind of defensive end I want drafted with a top ten pick is one the size of Mario Williams or Peppers. The top DE's this year are too light in the pants for my taste. Aren't you guys tired of getting run over? I think LT should be addressed, but I would not be heartbroken if we took a top corner, just not a smurf.

"DakotaT" wrote:

Quick point about this statement because I've heard it plenty and will only hear it more. You have to remember that Julius Peppers and Mario Williams weren't the size of Julius Peppers and Mario Williams when they left college. Nearly all speed rushing DEs have to bulk up once they get to the league. So what's important is whether or not they have a frame that can add weight without sacrificing much speed, not what they weigh at the combine. Keep in mind that these guys are 21-22 - they need time to bulk up to NFL level.

NOTE: I'm also very skeptical that there's a real, discernible difference between playing at 275lbs and 265lbs.

blank

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

16 years ago

#13

"mattresell" wrote:

"DakotaT" wrote:

If I am not mistaken both Peppers and Mario were 290+ coming out of college.

I am worried about any DE that is under 260 coming out. Yes some can bulk up and add strength without a dramatic hit to their speed. We have 2 270 DE that are developmental now. I do not want another developmental or pass rush only player especially with the #9 pick.

But that is just me.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

HoustonMatt
Registered

16 years ago

#14

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:

Can't find info on Peppers, but Mario was 287 coming out of college, so, yes, you are correct. Bad example on my part, but the overall premise is that most college DEs have to bulk up at the next level. It shouldn't be something you shy away from so long as they have the ability to put on weight.

This is interesting: Top 10 DE sack artists in 2008

John Abraham - 263
Jared Allen - 270
Julius Peppers - 283
Justin Tuck - 274
Mario Williams - 283
Robert Mathis - 245
Dwight Freeney - 268
Darren Howard - 260
Aaron Kampman - 265
Trent Cole - 270

The top DEs this year played between 260-270 for the most part. If you look at all the top DE prospects most are over 260 and the ones that aren't are within shouting distance.

blank

porky88
Veteran Member

16 years ago

#15

I don't like the idea of moving down because the Packers should be able to add an impact player at No. 9. They should be able to grab a DE that can give them 7 to 10 sacks on the year in my opinion. Maybe a run stuffing DT or a starting tackle.

Trading down to say 19 would put them in position to lose out on possibly an elite talent and get a mid tier talent. Granted you can land an elite talent anywhere in the draft as the past has suggested, but adding the 9th pick in the draft to a roster that is still in my opinion the most complete in the NFC North is something I am looking forward too.

http://www.row12.com/

minnypacker
Registered Topic Starter

16 years ago

#16

Who in round #1 will give us 8-9 sacks?

Orakapo...maybe
Others?

Bigbyfan
Member

16 years ago

#17

Many people here are saying that they want a DE that will give them a bunch of sacks next season... Recently the top DE's don't do much until their second or third season. Look at Mario Williams and Chris Long.

blank

minnypacker
Registered Topic Starter

16 years ago

#18

I agree....rare!

We need to look at FA or trade for an impact guy. Maybe Thompson will be that guy in year #2.

Right now I'm thinking Mays or an OT in round #1.

Bigbyfan
Member

16 years ago

#19

Im fine with Jenkins, in 3 games he had 2 1/2 sacks.
But I would also like a FA 😉

blank

Packers_Finland
Registered

16 years ago

#20

For those who think Mario emerged this year... they're wrong. Mario had more sacks last year than he had this year (14.0 > 12.0).

He had a good first year too, but that was without Amobi Okoye helping in the middle.

This is a placeholder

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (2h) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.

dfosterf (4h) : I'm going with a combination of the two.

beast (6h) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC

Zero2Cool (22h) : Fake news. Cowboys say no

Zero2Cool (23h) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.

beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?

beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you

wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.

wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.

wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious

beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere

beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.

beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.

beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...

beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered

wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.

wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.

wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet

beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury

beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State

beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.

Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.

Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22