Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
beast
a year ago

I am excited to see a healthy De'Vondre Campbell and hopefully more mature Quay Walker. I wonder if they'll have Quay blitzing more this season? I recall him succeeding in that role quite a bit.

I'm not really sure about Tariq Carpenter or Eric Wilson or even the rookie Brenton Cox. If they can spell the starters without getting destroyed, that's a win. But the starters need to really be thumpers.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I'm thinking we're going to be seeing more of a 5 man front with Walker clearly in a coverage role as a LB/S tweener. But possibly more blitzing from the 4-2 sub packages.

Cox is an Edge Rusher. 

Campbell can be a king of all trades (but can he be an Ace at anything?)

Walker is your coverage/speed guy, almost like a SS in a LB body.

McDuffie is your clear #3.

Wilson is your Vet STer.

Carpenter is probably mainly going to be STs, and backing up the coverage Walker role as he's been at Safety his entire career and now getting converted to ILB.
UserPostedImage
beast
a year ago

Did you guys think AJ Hawk was great? 

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



Hell no... not great. Good, consistent, reliable, average to above average, sure... Great, no.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
a year ago

Did you guys think AJ Hawk was great?  

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 


AJ Hawk was a prolific tackler and super reliable to be on the field. I would say he was a good LB, but can't say he was great. When he was drafted, everyone thought he pretty much hit his ceiling in college and he was really damn good in college. He wasn't going to be someone who was going to change the game, but he was going to be someone that wouldn't get beat, but also wasn't really going to beat anyone. That's why some were bemoaning taking LB in the top ten. Thing is though, trading back requires a partner to give you something you feel is adequate in return.
UserPostedImage
beast
a year ago

AJ Hawk was a prolific tackler and super reliable to be on the field. I would say he was a good LB, but can't say he was great. When he was drafted, everyone thought he pretty much hit his ceiling in college and he was really damn good in college. He wasn't going to be someone who was going to change the game, but he was going to be someone that wouldn't get beat, but also wasn't really going to beat anyone. That's why some were bemoaning taking LB in the top ten. Thing is though, trading back requires a partner to give you something you feel is adequate in return.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I will also say that I thought Hawk and Brady Poppinga both looked better in an attacking style of defense, then got placed at OLB in Jim Bates/Bob Sanders system where LBers were asked to react and OLBers were specifically asked take on blockers and funnel the plays back into the MLB. Which I wondered if that might of been too old school at the time. As far as I know, that thought process has died out in the NFL. And after their time with the Packers, neither Bates nor Sanders served consecutive years as Defensive Coordinator again (Sanders is still coaching LBers with the Buccaneers).

But it took Hawk and Poppinga some adjustment time to go from attacking style to full reacting style and then even worse, when we went back to the attacking style when the Packers went to a 3-4, it seemed like they could no longer go full on attack mode again, as they seemed to be over thinking. (Just my interpretation and) that held them both back from reaching their true potential.

Also just looking back in defensive Coordinators, it probably did not help that the team kept switching Coordinators there.

2003 - Ed Donatell (2000-2003)
2004 - Bob Slowik (DB coach under Donatell)
2005 - Jim Bates (DC for Dolphins since 2000)
2006 - Bob Sanders (Coached under Bates since 2001 and was Packers DC from 2006 to 2008)

Changing Coordinator often there. Not sure why they all left, but Sherman was probably on the hot seat in 2004 at least as he lost his GM duties in 2005 and we got a new head coach in 2006.

My understanding is that Jim Bates left because he interviewed for the head coaching job and did not get it, leaving him pissed that once again he was passed over (in 2004, the Dolphins head coach resigned after a 1-8 start and as interim head coach Bates finished the season 3-4 and some thought he might get a chance to continue as full time head coach, but they hired Nick Saban, whom was not interested in keeping Bates around).
​​​​​

But my overall point being, I feel like the the Scouts were drafting aggressive style players for a reactive style scheme (which is not ideal) and the coaches using/teaching a possibility out of date scheme also did not help the players maximize their potential.

Like drafting Stokes (Man Coverage CB) for an extremely Zone Heavy Scheme didn't seem ideal either. Though note Georgia did play a lot of of coverage, but their CBs are freaks of natures that are usually better in Man Coverage and the great pass rush and great athletic abilities get them through with Zone responsibilities.

​​​​
​​​​​
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
a year ago

AJ Hawk was a prolific tackler and super reliable to be on the field. I would say he was a good LB, but can't say he was great. When he was drafted, everyone thought he pretty much hit his ceiling in college and he was really damn good in college. He wasn't going to be someone who was going to change the game, but he was going to be someone that wouldn't get beat, but also wasn't really going to beat anyone. That's why some were bemoaning taking LB in the top ten. Thing is though, trading back requires a partner to give you something you feel is adequate in return.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I liked Brian Noble in the middle. Hawk was ok but didn't quite have that extra gear when it came to speed. Way better than Blake Martinez tho.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Martha Careful
a year ago
As long as we are going down memory lane....I liked Ray Nitschke
 image.png You have insufficient rights to see the content.
Go Packers!!!!
Mucky Tundra
a year ago

Did you guys think AJ Hawk was great? 
 

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 



Great? Nope! Average to occasionally above average? Yeah. I only listed him with Barnett and Bishop in the top ILB duos from the past because on the whole the position has been a black hole as far as talent goes. It's been refreshing to see competent play from Campbell (more so his 2021 season) and Walker the past two seasons. 

AJ Hawk was a prolific tackler and super reliable to be on the field. I would say he was a good LB, but can't say he was great. When he was drafted, everyone thought he pretty much hit his ceiling in college and he was really damn good in college. He wasn't going to be someone who was going to change the game, but he was going to be someone that wouldn't get beat, but also wasn't really going to beat anyone. That's why some were bemoaning taking LB in the top ten. Thing is though, trading back requires a partner to give you something you feel is adequate in return.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



In defense of Hawk (and lord knows I've lit him up here), he was a 4-3 WLB who was moved inside for duties he wasn't really well suited for (taking on offensive lineman). My understanding was that he was a textbook WLB and had he stayed in a 4-3 defense at that position he would have been a good one. 
“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”
UserPostedImage
"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
nerdmann
a year ago
Situation at Safety is like that time when we had a bunch of scrubs at WR and needed one to step up and Lazard was the man. Remember his breakout game in Detroit? 

Let's see a couple of these guys show us something. 
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (26m) : Greg Gumbel passed away today after bout with cancer.
buckeyepackfan (5h) : 1 NFC South @ NFC West @ AFC West other 3 games,
buckeyepackfan (5h) : Packers play NFC East and AFC North in 2025, plus 2 other games
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Geeze Zero get it right!😋
Zero2Cool (8h) : I guess 3 games. Whatever
Zero2Cool (8h) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.
Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Kanata, seek help! lol
beast (11h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status
Zero2Cool (11h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha
TheKanataThrilla (11h) : That was terrible.
TheKanataThrilla (11h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.
beast (12h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent
beast (12h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime
beast (12h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing
Zero2Cool (13h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is
Zero2Cool (13h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true
beast (13h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management
wpr (16h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
Mucky Tundra (23h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (27-Dec) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (26-Dec) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (26-Dec) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

10h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

10h / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

20h / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

27-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.