Even if the child has cognitive challenges, there's no excuse for not removing the child from the situation, in my opinion. It's a simple application of the Golden Rule: people go to a restaurant to have a good time.
"dfosterf" wrote:
I have one of these stories that comes with a happy ending. I took my extended family to a rather upscale restaurant for Christmas Eve. Dinner.
I think there was over 20 people in our "party". A gentleman and his wife were apparently doing essentially the same thing at the tables next to us, and him and I were "back-to-back" seating arrangement-wise.
In their party, there were a couple of kids acting up rather badly, and I seem to recall several trips were made by the mom wih child/children in tow to try and "quell the riot". While the kids were a bit on the irritating side, it was certainly no big deal, and these were obviously "good parents", in that they were doing everything in their power to calm their kids. I remember the "host" of the party leaning back and quietly apologizing to me for any disturbance these kids might be causing.
That in and of itself has a calming effect in the irritation department, if you know what I mean...you feel compassion instead of anger.
Our server showed up with a round of adult beverages, courtesy of the gentleman at the next table. This also served to help quiet any residual animosity felt by members of my family, and again the gentleman quietly apologized to me, and I insisted that it really was no big deal, but thank you very much for the drinks and concern. The other family left shortly after that.
Over an hour and several drinks later, we got up to leave, and I asked for the check. The server said there was no check, and that the gentleman that had been sitting next to you picked up your tab, and just wanted to say he was sorry for disturbing you. That check was easily over a thousand bucks.
"Nonstopdrivel" wrote: