Nonstopdrivel
16 years ago
Hooray for intangibles!
UserPostedImage
shield4life
16 years ago
Good find that's what I try to make people understand in my posts lol ... it's not rodgers / farve dillema that our record is this bad ... it's the defense
Glad To Be A Packers Fan.
longtimefan
16 years ago
Thats why i made this post, to make people see that there are other things wrong with this team
obi1
16 years ago
There are a Lot of things wrong with this team. One of those things is the intangibles...
blank
DarkaneRules
16 years ago
What should we plan to do about these intangibles? Perhaps we should pay everybody on the team more. Maybe that will give them more motivation to play better.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
ILikeThePackers39
16 years ago

What should we plan to do about these intangibles? Perhaps we should pay everybody on the team more. Maybe that will give them more motivation to play better.

"DarkaneRules" wrote:




Good luck, man. I'm giving up on this "intangibles" crap. It's just the same "we shouldn't have let Favre go!" complaining in a different package. We could devote days to 5 different objective analyses that would point out real, substantial culprits and some people are still going to point out these ephemeral "intangibles".

*Shrug* I don't get it, but whatever.
blank
Since69
16 years ago

What should we plan to do about these intangibles? Perhaps we should pay everybody on the team more. Maybe that will give them more motivation to play better.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:




Good luck, man. I'm giving up on this "intangibles" crap. It's just the same "we shouldn't have let Favre go!" complaining in a different package. We could devote days to 5 different objective analyses that would point out real, substantial culprits and some people are still going to point out these ephemeral "intangibles".

*Shrug* I don't get it, but whatever.

"DarkaneRules" wrote:



OK. Forget intangibles. What about time of possession? What about field position? What about whether a team is winning or losing when its defense takes the field? A lot of what an offense does affects the defense. Really, they both feed off the other.

I'd say we're poorer on both sides of the ball than we were last year.

(BTW, your pasties really bother me. Is that actually you in the picture?)
UserPostedImage
longtimefan
16 years ago

What should we plan to do about these intangibles? Perhaps we should pay everybody on the team more. Maybe that will give them more motivation to play better.

"Since69" wrote:




Good luck, man. I'm giving up on this "intangibles" crap. It's just the same "we shouldn't have let Favre go!" complaining in a different package. We could devote days to 5 different objective analyses that would point out real, substantial culprits and some people are still going to point out these ephemeral "intangibles".

*Shrug* I don't get it, but whatever.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



OK. Forget intangibles. What about time of possession? What about field position? What about whether a team is winning or losing when its defense takes the field? A lot of what an offense does affects the defense. Really, they both feed off the other.

I'd say we're poorer on both sides of the ball than we were last year.

(BTW, your pasties really bother me. Is that actually you in the picture?)

"DarkaneRules" wrote:



This years team is at 31:26 for TOP

Last year

30:19
ILikeThePackers39
16 years ago



(BTW, your pasties really bother me. Is that actually you in the picture?)

"Since69" wrote:




No, sir. Not me at all, just something I found off a GIS.
blank
obi1
16 years ago

What should we plan to do about these intangibles? Perhaps we should pay everybody on the team more. Maybe that will give them more motivation to play better.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:




Good luck, man. I'm giving up on this "intangibles" crap. It's just the same "we shouldn't have let Favre go!" complaining in a different package. We could devote days to 5 different objective analyses that would point out real, substantial culprits and some people are still going to point out these ephemeral "intangibles".

*Shrug* I don't get it, but whatever.

"DarkaneRules" wrote:



Wrong!

WE SHOULD have let Favre go. And we did! The intangibles played an important role because everybody thought it was #4's last year and he played his guts out.

He lost some respect from the fans and the management with his UNretirement. It doesn't mean that he wasn't special in 2007 and his all out play didn't affect his team. BOTH sides of the ball.

We are missing that "intangible" on this team THIS year. Whether you like to admit it or not, its not there!

THIS has nothing to do with comparing the 2 QBs or the plight of the team IF we had kept Favre.

So what prevents another player, a veteran, a leader, a star, to step up and take charge?
blank
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (5h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
    packerfanoutwest (6h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
    beast (7h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
    Zero2Cool (13h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
    Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
    packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
    Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
    beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
    beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
    Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
    Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
    buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
    buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
    Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
    Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
    beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
    beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
    beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    29 - 31
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    24 - 19
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    34 - 13
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    24 - 22
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    30 - 27
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    14 - 24
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    20 - 19
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    38 - 10
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    30 - 17
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    31 - 34
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    30 - 13
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    34 - 0
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

    24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

    24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.