nerdmann
4 years ago
Matt was misdirecting Tampa's D all over the field. All of a sudden they know where the ball is going EVERY TIME. Two INTs in a row, against Aaron Rodgers!? Please.

They run a screen out to 33 late in the 3rd. Defense is right there waiting for it.

This is NOT going to get fixed. Because there is nothing to fix. It's gonna go on for awhile until they figure out wtf it is. Maybe Brady brought some cheating over from NE.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
yooperfan
4 years ago
That game was fixed!
nerdmann
4 years ago

That game was fixed!

Originally Posted by: yooperfan 



This game flipped LIKE A SWITCH. Two consecutive INTs, by Aaron Rodgers? They need to self scout. This will continue to be used against them.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Cheesey
4 years ago
Looks like the Packers will have to change THEIR name to the “Green Bay Tampax”, because today they were only good for one period.
UserPostedImage
bboystyle
4 years ago
4-1. All smoke and mirrors.


Just another season of crappy football by GB wasting another HOF QBs career. Nothing new to see here folks
all_about_da_packers
4 years ago

This game flipped LIKE A SWITCH. Two consecutive INTs, by Aaron Rodgers? They need to self scout. This will continue to be used against them.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Or the players need to execute better. First INT was all Rodgers - look at the replay or watch the A22 when it comes out. He snaps, stares down Davante ALL the way on a blitz and the CB read it precisely because Aaron Rodgers makes it obvious he will throw to Davante once Davante makes his cut. So CB jumps the route when ball is released, and easy pick-6. It was atrociously poor fundamentals from Rodgers, not a design flaw.

Second INT was simply a missed catch that Davante should have had. Maybe you can argue it's a but of a fluke with a defender right there to catch the tipped ball, but Davante has to make that though catch (and usually does 95% of the time). The ball was literally in the hands of Davante - he just needs to secure it; or, if he doesn't, more likely than not there is no other defender nearby to grab that deflection. Bad execution with a little bad luck thrown in.

The only thing I will question on the play-calling is early emphasis on Aaron Jones boundary run calls. For those to work, in addition to WRs blocking, the O-line has to get to the second level to block LBs. It was clear pretty early on that our O-line was not going doing well blocking the LBs on the second level.

Not going to lie: I was jarred by Aaron throwing 2 INTs - so I can understand the team totally being deflated when that happened. But the execution by players needs to improve more than anything; it wasn't a scheme flaw or anything that needs self-scouting.
The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.
beast
4 years ago
So if the Packers don't win every single game it's either fixed or wasting a guys career? ...

Then FUCK IT! You should stop watching right now... I mean what's the point of wasting your time?

UserPostedImage
nerdmann
4 years ago

Or the players need to execute better. First INT was all Rodgers - look at the replay or watch the A22 when it comes out. He snaps, stares down Davante ALL the way on a blitz and the CB read it precisely because Aaron Rodgers makes it obvious he will throw to Davante once Davante makes his cut. So CB jumps the route when ball is released, and easy pick-6. It was atrociously poor fundamentals from Rodgers, not a design flaw.

Second INT was simply a missed catch that Davante should have had. Maybe you can argue it's a but of a fluke with a defender right there to catch the tipped ball, but Davante has to make that though catch (and usually does 95% of the time). The ball was literally in the hands of Davante - he just needs to secure it; or, if he doesn't, more likely than not there is no other defender nearby to grab that deflection. Bad execution with a little bad luck thrown in.

The only thing I will question on the play-calling is early emphasis on Aaron Jones boundary run calls. For those to work, in addition to WRs blocking, the O-line has to get to the second level to block LBs. It was clear pretty early on that our O-line was not going doing well blocking the LBs on the second level.

Not going to lie: I was jarred by Aaron throwing 2 INTs - so I can understand the team totally being deflated when that happened. But the execution by players needs to improve more than anything; it wasn't a scheme flaw or anything that needs self-scouting.

Originally Posted by: all_about_da_packers 



Not saying it's a sceme flaw.

It'sxlike when Herschel walker only put in his mouthpiece when it was a running play. Something like that. They knew what was coming.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Cheesey
4 years ago

So if the Packers don't win every single game it's either fixed or wasting a guys career? ...

Then FUCK IT! You should stop watching right now... I mean what's the point of wasting your time?

Originally Posted by: beast 


R-E-L-A-X, Beast!
Guys are just frustrated with what was an awful display today.
A complete failure on all parts.
With how we won the 4 games, it’s hard to imagine how they could play so terrible.
If you at least play well, then you don’t feel so deflated. After the first two drives, it was 100 % lousy.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
4 years ago

Or the players need to execute better. First INT was all Rodgers - look at the replay or watch the A22 when it comes out. He snaps, stares down Davante ALL the way on a blitz and the CB read it precisely because Aaron Rodgers makes it obvious he will throw to Davante once Davante makes his cut. So CB jumps the route when ball is released, and easy pick-6. It was atrociously poor fundamentals from Rodgers, not a design flaw.

Second INT was simply a missed catch that Davante should have had. Maybe you can argue it's a but of a fluke with a defender right there to catch the tipped ball, but Davante has to make that though catch (and usually does 95% of the time). The ball was literally in the hands of Davante - he just needs to secure it; or, if he doesn't, more likely than not there is no other defender nearby to grab that deflection. Bad execution with a little bad luck thrown in.

The only thing I will question on the play-calling is early emphasis on Aaron Jones boundary run calls. For those to work, in addition to WRs blocking, the O-line has to get to the second level to block LBs. It was clear pretty early on that our O-line was not going doing well blocking the LBs on the second level.

Not going to lie: I was jarred by Aaron throwing 2 INTs - so I can understand the team totally being deflated when that happened. But the execution by players needs to improve more than anything; it wasn't a scheme flaw or anything that needs self-scouting.

Originally Posted by: all_about_da_packers 


I couldn't believe it when I saw the replay. How can a HOF QB stare at his receiver the whole time? That's on the QB 101 stuff of things you never do. Even the second int was forced. There was defender right there and the double team defender was only a couple of steps away. Also QB 101 "don't throw into a double team. Someone else is going to be open."

UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (12h) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.