10.4
His acquisition, for the role he was playing, was a mistake.
Letting him go is not a mistake.
Originally Posted by: KRK
No, his acquisition for your expectations was a mistake... as you're expectations is rooted in old school football version of a FB.
His acquisition for being a verstile chess piece as some modern player are, of not fitting into a single label but being tweeners was quite good. He was just more H-Back than FB... but H-backs don't get their own label, so they called him a FB and that set up the wrong expections.
The kid got wide ass open with his routes as times...
Rodgers over threw Vitale and missed big plays like 4 games in a row. Could not connect.
Originally Posted by: gbguy20
Exactly, they had big plays waiting for Vitale doing a great job in his routes, as he's mainly a verstile receiver, but the balls never got to him...
Assuming his main skill set is blocking is wrong, more than his acquisition being wrong.