buckeyepackfan
5 years ago

OK, on its surface it may not seem like a great idea.

But....what if:
[list]

  • You felt Wilkerson was healthy and signed him to another “prove it” deal
  • You could trade Daniels for a strong proven offensive guard or tackle.
  • And let’s assume this player had a little bit time on his contract, and that his contract was more team friendly.[/list]
  • You then free up salary-cap space to fill another hole or two..,,Just saying...In the world of hypotheticals anything is plausible.

    Originally Posted by: KRK 

    NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO!
    Not now!
    The Packers start 2-7 and are eliminated from the playoffs, then trade him like they traded Ha Ha for a 2020 4th rnd pick.

    That's not gonna happen so....

    NO! NO! NO! NO! NO!
    I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
    KRK
    • KRK
    • Veteran Member
    5 years ago
    Buckeye, don't hold back, how do you really feel.
    In Luce tua Videmus Lucem KRK
    Zero2Cool
    5 years ago
    I'm not sure we have enough in our front seven to trade off Mike Daniels. The best we'd probably get is 2nd rounder and I would rather Daniels.
    UserPostedImage
    beast
    5 years ago

    The question comes from this tweet. What do you think?

    Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

    I find Silverstein's argument somewhere between weak and stupid...

    Because the whole focus is on, what Gute is looking for within the draft (and largely focusing on his edge selections), well Mike Daniels isn't in the draft (and he's not an edge player).

    The much more important question is how does he fit Pettine's system and while Daniels is a bit limited in his verstility, when fully healthy he's still one hell of a 3 tech, one gapper on the outside of the OG. And Pettine has talked about how Daniels / Clark's different styles have given oppents trouble, you might be good at stopping one style but not the other.

    I honestly am not sure whom is the Packers 2nd best 3 tech is... Lowry? Clark with Lancaster at NT? ... Adams has the physical potential, but as of last year he hadn't put it together (yet).

    But get rid of the guy, a different maker because he doesn't fit the high potential traits that your looking for in the draft is stupid... should we get rid of Rodgers cus he's not 6'4"+? No, he's a darn good player.

    That being said, there is a case to be made to trade of Daniels IF
    - you don't plan resigning him,
    - you don't plan on making a deep run in the playoffs
    - you don't expect to get comp picks, as you expect be active in FA
    - you want to free up or save his contact money

    But The Packers reportedly don't have the free cap space to go big in next year's FA, and so they could be in play for Comp and I'm not sure if Daniels saved cap space will make a big difference in that.

    And I think the Packers like the idea of trying to make a deep playoff run.

    I think Daniels is sticking around this year.

    UserPostedImage
    5 years ago
    You keep him this year becaus we're likely to get a comp pick for him if he leaves next year anyways. He's a veteran leader, and when healthy he's disruptive. He was still ranked as an above average player in limited time with nagging injuries last year. No reason to bail on him a year early.
    wpr
    • wpr
    • Preferred Member
    5 years ago

    You keep him this year becaus we're likely to get a comp pick for him if he leaves next year anyways. He's a veteran leader, and when healthy he's disruptive. He was still ranked as an above average player in limited time with nagging injuries last year. No reason to bail on him a year early.

    Originally Posted by: FLORIDA PACKER88 



    No comp pick. Teddy isn't running the show any longer. Gute will be looking to bring in 2-3 more FA next year.
    UserPostedImage
    TheKanataThrilla
    5 years ago

    No comp pick. Teddy isn't running the show any longer. Gute will be looking to bring in 2-3 more FA next year.

    Originally Posted by: wpr 



    What position do you think we would be looking for? I think we re-sign our own guys Martinez and hopefully get a good deal for Kenny. I don't see us looking around at much else looking at the line-up as it stands.
    go.pack.go.
    5 years ago

    What position do you think we would be looking for? I think we re-sign our own guys Martinez and hopefully get a good deal for Kenny. I don't see us looking around at much else looking at the line-up as it stands.

    Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla 



    Perhaps an ILB to go beside of Martinez? That’s the one position I was really hoping we would upgrade in this draft, and we didn’t. Maybe Ty Summers will surprise people. He looks good on the film I’ve seen of him.
    UserPostedImage
    TheKanataThrilla
    5 years ago

    Perhaps an ILB to go beside of Martinez? That’s the one position I was really hoping we would upgrade in this draft, and we didn’t. Maybe Ty Summers will surprise people. He looks good on the film I’ve seen of him.

    Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 



    I was hoping for one of the Devins. I think the Steelers screwed us, but pretty sure the Bengals were going for Bush as well. Curse you overtime Jets win.
    nerdmann
    5 years ago

    Perhaps an ILB to go beside of Martinez? That’s the one position I was really hoping we would upgrade in this draft, and we didn’t. Maybe Ty Summers will surprise people. He looks good on the film I’ve seen of him.

    Originally Posted by: go.pack.go. 



    Let's see what Burks has got. Messed up his shoulder last year. Plus he was a rookie. Martinez needed a year to get up to speed too.
    “Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (2m) : I see what you did there Mucky
    Zero2Cool (2m) : dammit. 3:25pm
    Zero2Cool (2m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
    Mucky Tundra (10m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
    Mucky Tundra (11m) : Yeah baby!
    Zero2Cool (31m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (1h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (1h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (2h) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (2h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (2h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (2h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (2h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (2h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (2h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (2h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    beast (2h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
    Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
    Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
    Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
    Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
    Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division
    beast (3h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : falcons are already ahead of us
    beast (3h) : Packers will get in
    beast (3h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : they still are in the playoffs
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
    Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.
    Mucky Tundra (6h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
    Mucky Tundra (6h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
    Mucky Tundra (6h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
    buckeyepackfan (7h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
    Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
    beast (16h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
    bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
    Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
    Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
    Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
    buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
    Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
    Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    1h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.