wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
5 years ago
Total offensive plays: 1,074

Quarterbacks

Aaron Rodgers: 1012
DeShone Kizer 62

Running backs

Jamaal Williams: 522
Aaron Jones: 376
Ty Montgomery: 150
Danny Vitale: 19
Kapri Bibbs: 17

Receivers

Davante Adams: 953
Marquez Valdes-Scantling: 691
Randall Cobb: 466
Equanimeous St. Brown: 358
Geronimo Allison: 241
Jake Kumerow: 136
J’Mon Moore: 74
Allen Lazard: 1

Tight ends

Jimmy Graham: 795
Lance Kendricks: 314
Marcedes Lewis: 190
Robert Tonyan: 67

Offensive line

Corey Linsley: 1,074
David Bakhtiari: 1,031
Lane Taylor: 881
Bryan Bulaga: 781
Byron Bell: 527
Justin McCray: 480
Jason Spriggs: 291
Lucas Patrick: 278
Alex Light: 26
Adam Pankey: 1
link 
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
5 years ago
It's crazy to think that Aaron Jones, one of the most dynamic running backs in the league last year, was only on the field for 35 percent of offensive snaps. Even with him missing four games, that still seems like a criminally low percentage. Does anyone know if he had injury issues in college or some other reason for the coaching staff to fear he might be fragile? Or did the suspension simply land him in Mike McCarthy's permanent doghouse?

I also find it interesting that the offense was only on the field for a total of ten more plays than the defense. To me that goes to show that they rarely, if ever, ran an up-tempo offense; that they couldn't sustain drives; or both. That would, of course, be congruent with the eye test. I really hope that we see a reemergence of the hurry-up offense with Matt LeFleur calling the plays. I have to think this offense has the horses to run it, provided Aaron Rodgers is reasonably healthy, of course. No one ever accused Peyton Manning of being a mobile quarterback, yet be ran the hurry-up offense with aplomb.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
5 years ago

It's crazy to think that Aaron Jones, one of the most dynamic running backs in the league last year, was only on the field for 35 percent of offensive snaps. Even with him missing four games, that still seems like a criminally low percentage. Does anyone know if he had injury issues in college or some other reason for the coaching staff to fear he might be fragile? Or did the suspension simply land him in Mike McCarthy's permanent doghouse?

I also find it interesting that the offense was only on the field for a total of ten more plays than the defense. To me that goes to show that they rarely, if ever, ran an up-tempo offense; that they couldn't sustain drives; or both. That would, of course, be congruent with the eye test. I really hope that we see a reemergence of the hurry-up offense with Matt LeFleur calling the plays. I have to think this offense has the horses to run it, provided Aaron Rodgers is reasonably healthy, of course. No one ever accused Peyton Manning of being a mobile quarterback, yet be ran the hurry-up offense with aplomb.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



I had many of the same thoughts. (I better see a dr and get a shot or two.)

It's a combination of many things. Missing 4 games is 25% of the season. Coming back after being off two weeks puts him a little behind and thus there were a few weeks where he probably didn't see the field as much. Maybe that can be classed as the MM's dog house complex. Next he has to share the load with Williams. I don't see why he should. He out produces so it should be a 70-30 split. (It would be interesting to know how often Aaron's audible from a run to a pass occurred with Williams on the field. I bet it was more frequent than when Jones was in the backfield.) Finally they run 3 and 4 WRs a lot which means neither RB is out there. All these ate away at his playing time.

I think it will be different in 2019.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (18h) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (23h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
20h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.