DoddPower
7 years ago

If the Bears decline Josh Sitton’s 2018 option, the Packers should pounce. Just before the opening week of the 2016 season, the Green Bay Packers  surprisingly released Pro Bowl  guard Josh Sitton  rather than allow him to play out the final year of his contract. That decision broke up the best guard combination in the league, a move completed by T.J. Lang’s departure to the Detroit Lions  last offseason. While Lang remains entrenched in Detroit, the Packers could receive a chance to fix part of that mistake in the coming months.
Sitton, who just completed his second season with the Chicago Bears , has a team option for 2018. Between Feb. 9 and March 10, the Bears must elect to either pick up that option (worth $8 million when coupled with his workout and roster bonuses) or decline it, allowing Sitton to hit unrestricted free agency. Should the latter occur, the Packers should think long and hard about bringing back the veteran guard.
On paper, the Bears have plenty of motivation to keep Sitton in town. The team invested considerable resources to acquire quarterback Mitchell Trubisky , and ensuring adequate pass protection could prove the difference between developing the 2017 first-round pick into a franchise passer or adding him to the pile of busted Bears signal-callers. Furthermore, Sitton continues to play at a high level, and while he has missed six games since arriving in Chicago, he remains a reasonable value at a cap hit around $8.6 million.
At the same time, the Bears could let Sitton walk and bring in his successor through the draft. Many prognosticators have tied the team to an offensive lineman like Notre Dame’s Quenton Nelson in the first round, including SB Nation’s Dan Kadar . For Chicago to get the most out a high selection like Nelson, opening a spot along the interior offensive line makes some sense. And while Sitton remains a reliable pass protector, the future looks more limited for the soon-to-be 32-year-old. While letting Sitton leave Chicago still seems like a stretch at this stage, the possibility cannot be entirely discounted.
But does a reunion make sense for the Packers? While Green Bay allowed 51 sacks in 2017 (fifth most in the NFL), much of the blame falls on the shoulders of Brett Hundley , who made nine starts, played the vast majority of a 10th game, and routinely held onto the ball too long (3 seconds on average, fourth longest out of the 41 qualified passers, per NFL Next Gen Stats ). As for the ground game, the Packers finished the season ranked fourth in offensive rushing by DVOA . Taken in context, Green Bay’s offensive line performed admirably this past year.
Still, the Packers depended on 34-year-old veteran Jahri Evans  to keep the O-line operational. Evans outperformed expectations considering he remained unsigned until one day before the 2017 NFL Draft , but he didn’t provide the consistency or all-around game of his predecessor Lang. Evans could return to Green Bay for his 13th NFL season, but the deterioration from the All-Pro form he displayed with the New Orleans Saints  would likely continue unabated.
While Sitton too has regressed in recent years, he remains an above-average guard familiar with the Packers offense and personnel. He could step in for Evans at right guard, where he played the first five seasons of his NFL career. Alternatively, Green Bay could place Sitton back at left guard with Lane Taylor  moving over to the right side where he previously played. Either configuration would provide a stronger offensive interior than the one Green Bay had last season.
That improvement could become critical should the Packers endure more issues at offensive tackle. Since signing a multiyear extension in 2015, Bryan Bulaga  has endured several injuries including a season-ending ACL tear this past November. The team has given no indications that it plans to move on from Bulaga, but the severity of his injury could force the front office to consider other options, even underperforming former second-round pick Jason Spriggs. If Green Bay has to break in a new starter at right tackle, having a solidified interior O-line would help expedite the transition.
Bringing back Sitton could provide benefits off the field as well. By all accounts, the veteran guard got along well with his fellow offensive linemen as well as Aaron Rodgers. The latter could prove especially meaningful given Rodgers’ contract status. The Packers will likely open negotiations with Rodgers on a new deal sometime over the next 12 months. While Rodgers doesn’t appear likely to leave Green Bay, returning one of his favorite linemen could erase any doubt.
But would Sitton consider a reunion with the team that unceremoniously cut him on the eve of the 2016 season? While he might harbor lingering angst, the organization has changed drastically in the time since his departure. Brian Gutekunst now directs the front office while former general manager Ted Thompson has moved into the background as a glorified scout. Eliot Wolf, then the director of football operations, has left for the Cleveland Browns . Unless head coach Mike McCarthy ultimately made the push to cut the Pro Bowl guard -- unlikely given his dependence on Sitton in the past and his reported desire to see the team add talent rather than lose it in free agency -- it seems Sitton would find a more agreeable situation than the one he left two seasons ago.
All of this highlights the value for both sides in reuniting. Sitton can return to the place where he won a Super Bowl  and compete for another while the Packers can improve their offensive line and reduce the risk of another major injury sidelining Rodgers and derailing their season. It would make for the rare win-win proposition in the NFL.


[/URL]      


Continue Reading @ [url=https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/2018/1/29/16946868/josh-sitton-packers-bears-free-agency-2018-option-decline-green-bay-reunion-nfl-2018]Jason B. Hirschhorn 

Jason B. Hirschhorn wrote:



Well this seems incredibly unlikely.
isocleas2
7 years ago

Well this seems incredibly unlikely.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



Incredibly unlikely sounds right. I wouldn't mind bringing Sitton back on a 1-2 year deal like Evans got but he's not the same player he was 5 years ago. Also the way he was cut right before the season I still think there's some truth to the rumours there was a locker room problem that led to him being released. I'm not sure that issue has been resolved.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
7 years ago

Well this seems incredibly unlikely.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



I have to agree.

It's always annoying when the media type people try to come up with non-stories during a slow Packers news day in a slow Packers news week that is also a slow Packers news month. They don't have anything to talk about but need their jobs so they scrabble looking for something, anything no matter how unrealistic it is and run it out there hoping someone will look at it. This rates just above the story that Teddy is carrying the love child of aliens.

I hate it when players are called a "Pro Bowl player" years after they received the "honor". Sutton is a former pro bowl player. He didn't make the team in 2017. While he did the prior 3 seasons he failed to win the beauty contest this season therefore he shouldn't be called one. I will agree it is not as much of an issue as it is when a player is given the title 5 or 6 years after going to the Pro Bowl. It's like telling us someone has "4.2 speed" 10 years after they ran that fast at the Combine. It's possible Sitton played well enough to be one of the best OG in the NFL but that is one of the issues with the Pro Bowl. They don't always give the award to the most qualified players. Therefore calling Sitton a Pro Bowl player is questionable because there is no guarantee he was the best player in the years he won the award.

Hirschhorn goes on to say that Evans is aging an thus losing his playing skills but conveniently overlooks Sitton's diminishing play. He doesn't mention that Sitton had to sit out 6 games over the last 2 seasons. That as Father Time creeps up on him, it is more and more likely to be the norm instead of the exception.

Most critical fact that was overlooked is if the Bears don't think Sitton is worth $8.6 million why should GB think he is worth that much or something close to it?

He isn't the player he once was. The locker room issues have not disappeared.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
7 years ago
According to Aaron Nagler, nothing was confirmed except he claims to "know" Thompson and McCarthy got tired of "his act". Sitton wasn't released because we needed money or his play drastically declined. He was released because did something unacceptable, or something that pushed the scale of releasing him vs keeping him into the release direction.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (7h) : I could feel my body decomposing in real time when I read that
Mucky Tundra (7h) : @MIKEYSAINRISTIL Tyler Shough will officially be the last person drafted to the NFL born in the 1900’s
Mucky Tundra (17h) : saw the tweet, he meant the city
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Was that for the team or the city?
Zero2Cool (17h) : Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter · 3m Draft grade is in: Green Bay gets an A. The people, the city, the venue were all superb. NFL Draft’s next
Zero2Cool (17h) : Matt LaFleur says Jaire Alexander is participating in #Packers offseason program, which has been conducted virtually during this first week
Zero2Cool (17h) : ✅ ...
buckeyepackfan (18h) : Check
Zero2Cool (20h) : Matthew Golden cahanged 81 to 22??
TheKanataThrilla (22h) : Sam Howell to Vikings...guess no Aaron
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : 1 round 7 min, with one extra minute if there is a trade. 2nd round 4 minutes, 3rd -3, 2 thereafter IMO
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Agree
dfosterf (26-Apr) : Great idea imo
dfosterf (26-Apr) : 1st round to 7 minutes with one extension
dfosterf (26-Apr) : NFL comissioner wants to shorten the 2st
Mucky Tundra (26-Apr) : @jalenreagors They’re discussing if Sheduer can go back to college on NFL Network LMFAOOOOO
beast (26-Apr) : Great point Martha
beast (26-Apr) : Buddy Ryan used to say if a candy bar goes missing, there are two to blame, Rex and Rob 🤪 jk 😁
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Bum Phillips used to say there are two ways to get better. Get better players or get players to play better. We have a new DL coach
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : Yes. Look at the losses last year. They can win.
beast (26-Apr) : Can Packers win with their current DL?
bboystyle (26-Apr) : waiting for a pass rusher.
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 5 minutes between picks in the 3rd
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 3rd. Hate this phone
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 4rd
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 5 minutes in the 4
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 7 minutes between picks in the 2nd round
Martha Careful (25-Apr) : Sorry to bitch, but the headline writers in that section absolutely mislead, or don't know how to read. It is maddening
Martha Careful (25-Apr) : No thanks. Not a dependable guy to be in the right place and run the right route. Dumb as a box of rocks.
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : Losing 2nd round pick for a one year rental, not ideal. Especially a headcase.
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Pickens for Jaire may be interesting. Definitely not sure we want Pickens long term.
dfosterf (25-Apr) : No.Absolutely not
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : NO NO NO NO NO NO!!1 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
dhazer (25-Apr) : scenario: Our main prospects are off the board when our pick comes around, do we just throw a 2nd round pick at Pittsburgh for Pickens
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Hopefully she had some comfort that her son will be live his dream when she passed away. Sad news.
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Damn that sucks
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : News about Derrick Harmon mom, saddening.
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : Mark Murphy: "I predict we will trade up once and down twice."
beast (25-Apr) : Rip the Packers and getting the fans yelling and booing him
beast (25-Apr) : Super competitive Bears fan and WWE "superstar" wrestler, Seth Rollins is supposed to announce a Bears pick and absolutely rip Packers
packerfanoutwest (25-Apr) : Golden
beast (25-Apr) : I want DT Derrick Harmon, Oregon
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : And I can't be looking at my phone
Mucky Tundra (25-Apr) : Hey I'm at work lol
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : btw, new site chat won't delete auto like
Zero2Cool (24-Apr) : because everyone left like wimps
TheKanataThrilla (24-Apr) : I am wondering if there is some type of autoclear when there isn't activity after a certain amount of time.
Mucky Tundra (24-Apr) : What happened in the chat? Me and Zero posted a few things earlier and they're all gone
dfosterf (24-Apr) : 10-15 min bs plus flyover
dfosterf (24-Apr) : Yes
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Around The NFL / beast

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

14h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

14h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

14h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

15h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

15h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

15h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

26-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / earthquake

26-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.