DoddPower
7 years ago

If the Bears decline Josh Sitton’s 2018 option, the Packers should pounce. Just before the opening week of the 2016 season, the Green Bay Packers  surprisingly released Pro Bowl  guard Josh Sitton  rather than allow him to play out the final year of his contract. That decision broke up the best guard combination in the league, a move completed by T.J. Lang’s departure to the Detroit Lions  last offseason. While Lang remains entrenched in Detroit, the Packers could receive a chance to fix part of that mistake in the coming months.
Sitton, who just completed his second season with the Chicago Bears , has a team option for 2018. Between Feb. 9 and March 10, the Bears must elect to either pick up that option (worth $8 million when coupled with his workout and roster bonuses) or decline it, allowing Sitton to hit unrestricted free agency. Should the latter occur, the Packers should think long and hard about bringing back the veteran guard.
On paper, the Bears have plenty of motivation to keep Sitton in town. The team invested considerable resources to acquire quarterback Mitchell Trubisky , and ensuring adequate pass protection could prove the difference between developing the 2017 first-round pick into a franchise passer or adding him to the pile of busted Bears signal-callers. Furthermore, Sitton continues to play at a high level, and while he has missed six games since arriving in Chicago, he remains a reasonable value at a cap hit around $8.6 million.
At the same time, the Bears could let Sitton walk and bring in his successor through the draft. Many prognosticators have tied the team to an offensive lineman like Notre Dame’s Quenton Nelson in the first round, including SB Nation’s Dan Kadar . For Chicago to get the most out a high selection like Nelson, opening a spot along the interior offensive line makes some sense. And while Sitton remains a reliable pass protector, the future looks more limited for the soon-to-be 32-year-old. While letting Sitton leave Chicago still seems like a stretch at this stage, the possibility cannot be entirely discounted.
But does a reunion make sense for the Packers? While Green Bay allowed 51 sacks in 2017 (fifth most in the NFL), much of the blame falls on the shoulders of Brett Hundley , who made nine starts, played the vast majority of a 10th game, and routinely held onto the ball too long (3 seconds on average, fourth longest out of the 41 qualified passers, per NFL Next Gen Stats ). As for the ground game, the Packers finished the season ranked fourth in offensive rushing by DVOA . Taken in context, Green Bay’s offensive line performed admirably this past year.
Still, the Packers depended on 34-year-old veteran Jahri Evans  to keep the O-line operational. Evans outperformed expectations considering he remained unsigned until one day before the 2017 NFL Draft , but he didn’t provide the consistency or all-around game of his predecessor Lang. Evans could return to Green Bay for his 13th NFL season, but the deterioration from the All-Pro form he displayed with the New Orleans Saints  would likely continue unabated.
While Sitton too has regressed in recent years, he remains an above-average guard familiar with the Packers offense and personnel. He could step in for Evans at right guard, where he played the first five seasons of his NFL career. Alternatively, Green Bay could place Sitton back at left guard with Lane Taylor  moving over to the right side where he previously played. Either configuration would provide a stronger offensive interior than the one Green Bay had last season.
That improvement could become critical should the Packers endure more issues at offensive tackle. Since signing a multiyear extension in 2015, Bryan Bulaga  has endured several injuries including a season-ending ACL tear this past November. The team has given no indications that it plans to move on from Bulaga, but the severity of his injury could force the front office to consider other options, even underperforming former second-round pick Jason Spriggs. If Green Bay has to break in a new starter at right tackle, having a solidified interior O-line would help expedite the transition.
Bringing back Sitton could provide benefits off the field as well. By all accounts, the veteran guard got along well with his fellow offensive linemen as well as Aaron Rodgers. The latter could prove especially meaningful given Rodgers’ contract status. The Packers will likely open negotiations with Rodgers on a new deal sometime over the next 12 months. While Rodgers doesn’t appear likely to leave Green Bay, returning one of his favorite linemen could erase any doubt.
But would Sitton consider a reunion with the team that unceremoniously cut him on the eve of the 2016 season? While he might harbor lingering angst, the organization has changed drastically in the time since his departure. Brian Gutekunst now directs the front office while former general manager Ted Thompson has moved into the background as a glorified scout. Eliot Wolf, then the director of football operations, has left for the Cleveland Browns . Unless head coach Mike McCarthy ultimately made the push to cut the Pro Bowl guard -- unlikely given his dependence on Sitton in the past and his reported desire to see the team add talent rather than lose it in free agency -- it seems Sitton would find a more agreeable situation than the one he left two seasons ago.
All of this highlights the value for both sides in reuniting. Sitton can return to the place where he won a Super Bowl  and compete for another while the Packers can improve their offensive line and reduce the risk of another major injury sidelining Rodgers and derailing their season. It would make for the rare win-win proposition in the NFL.


[/URL]      


Continue Reading @ [url=https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/2018/1/29/16946868/josh-sitton-packers-bears-free-agency-2018-option-decline-green-bay-reunion-nfl-2018]Jason B. Hirschhorn 

Jason B. Hirschhorn wrote:



Well this seems incredibly unlikely.
isocleas2
7 years ago

Well this seems incredibly unlikely.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



Incredibly unlikely sounds right. I wouldn't mind bringing Sitton back on a 1-2 year deal like Evans got but he's not the same player he was 5 years ago. Also the way he was cut right before the season I still think there's some truth to the rumours there was a locker room problem that led to him being released. I'm not sure that issue has been resolved.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
7 years ago

Well this seems incredibly unlikely.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



I have to agree.

It's always annoying when the media type people try to come up with non-stories during a slow Packers news day in a slow Packers news week that is also a slow Packers news month. They don't have anything to talk about but need their jobs so they scrabble looking for something, anything no matter how unrealistic it is and run it out there hoping someone will look at it. This rates just above the story that Teddy is carrying the love child of aliens.

I hate it when players are called a "Pro Bowl player" years after they received the "honor". Sutton is a former pro bowl player. He didn't make the team in 2017. While he did the prior 3 seasons he failed to win the beauty contest this season therefore he shouldn't be called one. I will agree it is not as much of an issue as it is when a player is given the title 5 or 6 years after going to the Pro Bowl. It's like telling us someone has "4.2 speed" 10 years after they ran that fast at the Combine. It's possible Sitton played well enough to be one of the best OG in the NFL but that is one of the issues with the Pro Bowl. They don't always give the award to the most qualified players. Therefore calling Sitton a Pro Bowl player is questionable because there is no guarantee he was the best player in the years he won the award.

Hirschhorn goes on to say that Evans is aging an thus losing his playing skills but conveniently overlooks Sitton's diminishing play. He doesn't mention that Sitton had to sit out 6 games over the last 2 seasons. That as Father Time creeps up on him, it is more and more likely to be the norm instead of the exception.

Most critical fact that was overlooked is if the Bears don't think Sitton is worth $8.6 million why should GB think he is worth that much or something close to it?

He isn't the player he once was. The locker room issues have not disappeared.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
7 years ago
According to Aaron Nagler, nothing was confirmed except he claims to "know" Thompson and McCarthy got tired of "his act". Sitton wasn't released because we needed money or his play drastically declined. He was released because did something unacceptable, or something that pushed the scale of releasing him vs keeping him into the release direction.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (52m) : That is fair by me.
buckeyepackfan (54m) : Kenny Clark is the player, 2 1st rnd picks
Zero2Cool (1h) : umm... what?
wpr (1h) : I am stunned
Mucky Tundra (1h) : RICKEY SCOOPS WAS RIGHT AGAIN!!!
Mucky Tundra (1h) : ITS HAPPENING
buckeyepackfan (1h) : DEAL IS DONE
buckeyepackfan (1h) : MICAH IS COMING TO GREEN BAY!!!!!!!!!
wpr (7h) : Me do-ed it gooderly,
Zero2Cool (22h) : Bahah, I was like WTF why isn't anyone posting on PP.com ... oops no one has permissions
dfosterf (23h) : tell her I reckon
dfosterf (23h) : Micah Robinson cut. Probable PS player tomorrow. Has to call mom back and t
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : New site so much better. Might make switch and deal with it.
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Mecole Hardman to our practice squad
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Nick Nieman from Texans our 5th linebacker. Special teams signing
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Looks like we signed Clayton Tune as QB3
wpr (27-Aug) : TKT people lose their minds over QB3. Point is almost none of them are ready that's why they are on the PS and other teams don't take them.
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Unfortunately he doesn't seem ready to be an emergency QB.
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : As a Canadian and a follower of Canadian University football. I am rooting for him
dfosterf (27-Aug) : I bet a lot of us will follow the Taylor Elgersma journey with interest. Personally, got a Kurt Warner vibe goin' on. I like him
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Not sure if either will be claimed though.
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Tune or Hooker would make sense
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Clayton Tune cut by the Cards? Don't know if that's the guy, we shall see
TheKanataThrilla (27-Aug) : Per Bill Huber, the Packers will not be bringing back Taylor Elgersma or Sean Clifford on the practice squad, so a new third quarterback
Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : Schefter must have deleted his tweet
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Hopefully Jerry reaches under the seat cushions and ashtrays of his jet and scrapes up the 45 million apr and spares us further nonsense
dfosterf (27-Aug) : Have to admit the PO'd Cowboy fan videos would be fun to watch. Problem with draft picks is half their fanbase barely knows what that is
beast (27-Aug) : I think Cowboys fans are ready to get their pitch forks and burning sticks if Jerry were to trade Micah
dfosterf (27-Aug) : If Jerry traded Micah to GB, here in northern Va. they would have to quick build yet another data center to handle the internet hate traffic
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : its signing and trades that you don't hear about, other then announced
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : If you hear rumors about Packers sign or trade, won't happen. Not how they work
dfosterf (27-Aug) : 19 players in a contract year. Jones called loss to us worst loss in Cowboy history. Forget Parsons trade. Not happenin' Cap'n
packerfanoutwest (27-Aug) : The Packers, meanwhile, are the youngest team in the league for the third consecutive year.
dfosterf (27-Aug) : That it was darkest before the dawn in Bengals and Commanders before they got deals done
Zero2Cool (27-Aug) : what is Schefter saying?
dfosterf (27-Aug) : He was getting Dorito infusion therapy
dfosterf (27-Aug) : He's outta shape. Why, just the other day I saw him splayed out on the trainers table
Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : Parsons has followed Rasheed Walker on Twitter. Quite the choice
Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : Kuhn is a former player who works for the team, if somethings going down, he would be close to it
Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : @kuhnj30 Micah Freaking Parsons
Mucky Tundra (27-Aug) : A LOT of buzz on the Bird App regarding Parsons; even Schefter is saying it's serious
dfosterf (26-Aug) : *Orzech*
dfosterf (26-Aug) : Orzich long snapper 3 yr extension
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : Packers signed someone for three year deal
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : lol i know it's insane ... sign up for the waiver wire then you'll know
wpr (26-Aug) : YES!!!!!!
Mucky Tundra (26-Aug) : WE WANT THE LIST! WE WANT THE LIST!
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : @JJLahey · 2m Holy crap, Packers, where the heck is the list?
Zero2Cool (26-Aug) : haha folks on Tweeter every year this time ... 'where is list Packers!!" hahaha
wpr (26-Aug) : He played pretty good.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
3m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22m / Green Bay Packers Talk / earthquake

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

22h / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

22h / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

27-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Cheesey

26-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

26-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

25-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

24-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

24-Aug / Around The NFL / beast

23-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

22-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.