O.K. I Will Start It.· Page 3

4PackGirl
Registered

16 years ago

I'm tired of hearing people say, "Well, if we had Brett then we'd be soooo much better....blah blah blah.....".

WE DO NOT HAVE BRETT FRIGGIN FAVRE ANYMORE!!!!

The Green Bay Packers have moved on. And if you were a true fan of the Packers, you should also move on.

I certainly have. I still enjoy watching Brett, and I will root for the Jets as long as Brett is there, unless of course they are playing the Packers.

Let's all just move on.

Sound good?

"cheeseheads123" wrote:

Amen

"go.pack.go." wrote:

ditto!!

TheEngineer
Registered

16 years ago

#22

O.K. I will Start It.

Brett did today what Aaron could not do. He Beat the Titans!

What a fricken Joke.

Jets are 8-3 Brett has not lost to an NFC Team (2-0) And the J.E.T.S. are going to the Super Bowl.

The Packers would be un-defeated right now if they did not crap on the greatest Q.B. in history.

What a waste!

"RaiderPride" wrote:

Brett Favre did not beat the Titans.

The Jets beat the Titans.

Also, do you happen to have proof that the Packers would be undefeated? Conducted a statistical analysis of a large sample of simulations with considerable confidence over your statement as fact? Because what I'm seeing is a post full of biased hyperbole, nothing more.

blank

Packerchick
Member

16 years ago

#23

"go.pack.go." wrote:

I have moved on too.

I am a woman and I love football.

gbpfan
Registered

16 years ago

#24

I will ask you this if the Jets start losing and Brett starts with his old habits to stay in a game,what will your opinion be then.I think for A-rods first season he has done a great job,the pack as a team what the jets need to think about is retirement where will you go from there.So in away think Green Bay made the right choice I like brett think he is a great q.b and always will be,but when you can't make up your mind so good luck and glad Brett is doing great as a jet.

dhpackr
Registered

16 years ago

#25

Rodgers will never be Favre, that's agreeable.

Brett carved up the Titans? I could have sworn I seen them running all over the Titans which makes passing a whole lot easier.

Aaron threw it into the grass the entire first half?
http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/playbyplay?game_id=29651&displayPage=tab_play_by_play&season=2008&week=REG9&override=true

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

dude, talk about research, do you realize the thread you posted plainly and quite simply states how rodgers first seven passes all were thrown short. While Brett's first seven passes were 7 for 7 and a touchdown.

what game were you watching?

So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste

longtimefan
Registered

16 years ago

#26

"dhpackr" wrote:

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Ummmmm

research yeah...

the short means the distance...

Check it

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/playbyplay?game_id=29698&displayPage=tab_play_by_play&season=2008&week=REG12&override=true

B.Favre pass short left to 89-J.Cotchery
4-B.Favre pass

short right to 87-L.Coles to TEN 47 for 13 yards (29-C.Carr).

B.Favre pass short middle to 81-D.Keller to TEN 34 for 5 yards (53-K.Bulluck).

-B.Favre pass deep left intended

Do YOUR research b4 calling someone out ok pudden?

dhpackr
Registered

16 years ago

#27

Do YOUR research b4 calling someone out ok pudden?

"longtimefan" wrote:

you never cease to amaze me with your knowledge. Favre was a key factor in beating a undefeated team, and rodgers was key in losing the game.

favre started the game against the titans 7 for 7 and a td.

rodgers started the game against tenn 0 for 7 and every throw was in the dirt.

is this so hard to comprehend?

and i do not need to look at any stat sheet to know this, because I watched both games.

keep it up, this is only going to be more fun as the season progresses.

So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste

longtimefan
Registered

16 years ago

#28

Do YOUR research b4 calling someone out ok pudden?

"dhpackr" wrote:

"longtimefan" wrote:

dude, it has NOTHING to do with Brett okay pudden?

You said that by zeros "Research" it proved they were in the dirt..

I proved to you all his researched proved is that the passes were short, middle or deep..

AND AGAIN I LOVE BF AND WANT HIM ON THE PACKERS..HE WILL WIN HIS 4TH MVP AND MAYBE GO TO THE AFCCGM

( that was all for you, cuz you still have it in your thick skull I am a BF hater)

but I can not make him come back..So I am trying to figure out what the PACKERS can do to get better

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

16 years ago

#29

"dhpackr" wrote:

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Posts like this make me wonder. Why don't we have the icon for a head beating into a wall?

Did I even say he didn't? I think I questioned it, posted a link and waited for someone else to do the research. But go ahead act macho on the interwebz and continue to waste its hard drive.

And how the heck did we go from talking about Rodgers to Favre? OH hell I don't even know what started this thread or what the original topic was. Why? Well, just look at some of the participants 😉

dhpackr
Registered

16 years ago

#30

So I am trying to figure out what the PACKERS can do to get better

"longtimefan" wrote:

fire the GM.
Hire Holmgren to run the Pack.

So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (1h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha

wpr (1h) : Tomorrow is almost here.

packerfanoutwest (1h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?

packerfanoutwest (1h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him

Zero2Cool (3h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.

packerfanoutwest (14h) : don't care

Zero2Cool (19h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?

packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (22-Apr) : now 3

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?

beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24