Packers release TE Martellus Bennett· Page 3

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#21

Dude, we were starting McRay at LT.

I mean, we GOT guys who can catch. 🤣

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

I've been waiting too long to ask this... you know it's McCray, right?

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#22

In theory I like it, but I'd argue we got only young guys on the 53 already that we're not really using in Davis and Allison, so we can get the young WR reps without bringing anyone up.

Of course... if you're thinking about trying to use him (6'6") as a TE, then that might be different as there is a wide open there for young guys, but I'm not sure he has the weight nor strength for real TE. Also bringing him up now, might make him harder to get the PS next year (if he's still not ready for the 53 man roster then).

I'm guessing they'll move up FB Kerridge (not what I want, but what I'm guessing they'll do), who I thought was a better pure power blocker than Rip... also I'd like to see them get Rip more involved, unless they don't trust him with the ball. Flex him out to TE or RB some... maybe on 3rd and short we could see Rip as a RB with Kerridge as the FB. We need something to work for 3rd and short, and this could help the running game, which hopefully will help the passing game.

Originally Posted by: beast

Clark is definitely too thin to be a TE. I think he is thinner than Jimmy Graham and that dude can't block at all. I just think he is a kid with a bunch of potential and the more exposure we can give him the better. I really hope he is not still only a PS prospect next year.

I like Kerridge, but until/unless we move on from Rip I am not sure what he offers us from the current status quo. I am extremely disappointed how little we have used Rip this year, I just don't see what we would actually gain by having them both up on the 53. Why not just have Rip pretend to be a blocking TE?

Of the practice squad guys I would like to see Clark up as to be honest he has a bit of boom potential. Max wouldn't be bad either as he and Brett did click.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

7 years ago

#23

I agree on your take on both Cook and Bennett.
I'm not sad to see Bennett gone.
I'm waiting to hear the whole story.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

This is the PACKERS, you know? Our chances of hearing the whole story is about ZERO!😂
(Not OUR Zero!)😝

beast
Select Member

7 years ago

#24

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla

We all hope to see players develop into their full potential quickly, but it has taken some guys 3 years to fully develop (including Nelson)... so it's no knock... but Clark college film, did look like the least developed WRs that I remember the Packers ever bringing it, but a whole lot of raw talent, I was just thinking it might take longer to develop him.

Also I thought he only had 1 year each playing HS, college and Pros. But looks like he practiced while sitting out a transfer year so he's played the last 3 years (then you have to go all the way back to freshmen year of high school). But I feel better with 3 years than 2 for some reason.

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#25

We all hope to see players develop into their full potential quickly, but it has taken some guys 3 years to fully develop (including Nelson)... so it's no knock... but Clark college film, did like the least developed WRs that I remember the Packers ever bringing it, but a whole lot of raw talent, I was just thinking it might take longer to develop him.

Also I thought he only had 1 year each playing HS, college and Pros. But looks like he practiced while sitting out a transfer year so he's played the last 3 years (then you have to go all the way back to freshmen year of high school). But I feel better with 3 years than 2 for some reason.

Originally Posted by: beast

I totally agree and concur, my fear is losing this kid. You can't teach size and the kid seems to have pretty good hands. He is raw, but I just have this good feeling about him I can't shake. I hope I am not wrong.

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#26

Word is Bennett was diagnosed with Brick Hands before he signed with GB.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

blueleopard
Member

7 years ago

#27

This is the PACKERS, you know? Our chances of hearing the whole story is about ZERO!😂
(Not OUR Zero!)😝

Originally Posted by: Cheesey

Yeah, but this is Martellus Bennett. He doesn't give a shit about what anybody thinks. He'll run his mouth, and we all love him for it.

Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings

Dulak
Veteran Member

7 years ago

#28

Failure to disclose injury. sounds like they are going to go after him for money.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins

Ya ... probably has to do with his statement about wanting to retire when the packers what signed him for 3 years and wanted a good TE for 3 years. Maybe the packers were pissed and then looked for a way out to get some or most of their money back and ya that would be a way.

Just like insurance companies do in the states if they have pre-existing condition clauses or other clauses - the reason they do is they dont want to pay.

wpr
Preferred Member

7 years ago

#29

We all knew Marty was coming in with a lot of baggage. The hope was he would perform and the baggage wouldn't matter. Oh well.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (2h) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.

beast (2h) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time

Mucky Tundra (6h) : *had to be IRed at 53

Mucky Tundra (6h) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before

beast (7h) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season

beast (7h) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.

beast (7h) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.

Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔

dfosterf (11h) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress

dfosterf (11h) : Zero- Did you see what I posted about Voice of Reason and his wife? She posted over at fleaflicker that they are both "In"

Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Well, not crazy, it makes sense. Crazy I didn't notice/find it earlier

Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : it's crazy how one stored procedure to get data bogged everything down for speed here

dfosterf (7-Aug) : to herd cats or goldfish without a bowl. They reminded me of the annual assembly of our fantasy league

dfosterf (7-Aug) : out on a field trip, outfitting them with little yellow smocks. Most of the little folk were well behaved, but several were like trying

dfosterf (7-Aug) : Yesterday my wife and I spent the afternoon on the waterfront here in Alexandria, Va. A daycare company took about 15 three/four year olds

wpr (7-Aug) : seems faster. yay

dfosterf (7-Aug) : Wife of reason posted on the in/out thread on fleaflicker that both she and vor are in

Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : This page was generated in 0.135 seconds.

Mucky Tundra (7-Aug) : Tbh, I can never tell the difference in speed unless it's completely shitting the bed

Zero2Cool (7-Aug) : Sure does feel like site is more snappy

Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : I thought that was the Lions OL

Mucky Tundra (6-Aug) : Travis Glover placed on IR; seasons over for him

Zero2Cool (6-Aug) : found bad sql in database, maybe site faster now?

dfosterf (5-Aug) : I'm going to call that a good move.

Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Packers sign CB Corey Ballentine

Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : I'm not sure how to kill the draft order just yet so it's not so confusing.

Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : *to be able

Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : and because it's not a dynasty league (which makes a lot more sense to be ability to trade picks)

Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Oh I know; I was just exploring and it blew my mind that you could trade picks because of the whole reordering thing

Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Zero, I think I preferred my offer: your 1st for my 15th rounder

Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : Keep in mind, we do a draft reorder once all members locked in

Zero2Cool (4-Aug) : You can have my 12th Rd for your 2nd round

Mucky Tundra (4-Aug) : Hey i didn't know we could trade picks in fantasy

Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Update: Rock has tried a cheese curd, promises it's not his last

Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : watch it!! lol

Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : you're right, we never did leave, the site just went down :P

Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Rock claims to have never eaten a cheese curd

Zero2Cool (3-Aug) : We did not leave.

Mucky Tundra (3-Aug) : Family Night! WE ARE SO BACK!

Mucky Tundra (2-Aug) : To this day, I'm still miffed about his 4 TD game against Dallas on Thanksgiving going to waste

Martha Careful (2-Aug) : Congratulations Sterling Sharpe. He was terrific and I loved watching him play.

beast (2-Aug) : I believe it's technically against the CBA rules, but Jerry just calls it a simple unofficial chat... and somehow gets away with it.

beast (2-Aug) : Jerry Jones is infamous for ̶n̶e̶g̶o̶t̶i̶a̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ chatting with players one on one... and going around the agent.

Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Oo just saw a blurb saying that Dallas negotiated directly with Parsons and not through his agent

Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : I assumed that both guys will get paid, just a matter of when or how we get there

Zero2Cool (1-Aug) : McLaurin nor Micah going anywhere. They will get money

Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : the Synder years or do they take care of one of their own?

Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Do the Commanders risk losing a top WR with an emerging QB just because he's turning 30 and potentially risk damaging the rebuild from

Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : Turns 30 this September, plays at a high level and Washington has some cap space I believe

Mucky Tundra (1-Aug) : More interesting is Washington with Terry McLaurin

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2025 Packers Schedule

Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM

COMMANDERS

Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM

Browns

Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM

Cowboys

Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM

BENGALS

Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM

Cardinals

Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM

Steelers

Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM

PANTHERS

Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM

EAGLES

Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM

Giants

Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM

Lions

Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM

Broncos

Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM

Bears

Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM

RAVENS

Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM

Vikings