Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
7 years ago
GB practices injury substitutions constantly to get the player's mindset on coming off bench cold. Sunday, the most ill-prepared was MM.

When Rodgers went down, MM’s focus needed to be 100% on getting Hundley ready for Saints and he failed miserably because he was coaching from a text book instead of coaching in the moment.

He ran too much on 1st down because the text books say, establish the run to open up passing game. But, is he delusional? An OL that never played as a unit together on either side, w/ players ranked on OL as #9, 10 and 11? Does he think this OL will have any shot at establishing he run against that fresh and rested front 7 and even worse when Smith comes in box? This is pure idiocy! All it did was put Hundley in 2nd and long, which the text book says leads to 3rd and longs.

1Q :12 3rd and 2, GB lines up, Minny gets a look and their mind set on what to do. GB calls TO and they come back with same play! Hundley anticipates Allison will be open; but doesn’t adjust his throw when the anticipated reaction by Minny proved wrong.

14:45 1st and 10. Minny brings 8 in box. This should be anticipated by Mike McCarthy because that’s what the text books say. With an inexperienced QB ya gotta get the run going, so Minny is thinking, stop the run, then t-off on young QB in 2nd and 3rd and long. Quick 4-5 yard passes needed to be called on 1st; instead the attempt to establish the run consistently put Hundley in 2nd and long.

8:04 3Q, on 3rd and 9 Hundley hits a 10 yarder to Cobb for first down; then to Jordy for 9…okay now the kid is on a roll a perfect op for play action, and idiot Mike McCarthy calls run, followed by another run and a punt. This idiotic play calling that robbed Hundley of getting into rhythm, of “stacking success” and pilfered from him valuable reps to prep for next week.

6:26 3Q, 4th and 1 at 46, Down by 7. The text book says punt. I ask Mikey boy, punt to your healthy and vaunted defense? In one felled swoop, Mike McCarthy filches from Hundley a great pressure opportunity, and steals more reps and tells Hundely, "I dont trust you." . Even if you miss, the shorter field means GB gets the ball back sooner to get Hundley more snaps.

9:17 4Q, 4th and 4, down by 13, at GB 33. The text book says punt, but why? Do you think you can win? Brett needed that 4th and 4 opportunity to prep for next week.

And of course we saw last drive. Minny put 2 safeties back, CBs drop back of LOS and Hundley shined. The further behind the sooner Minny goes into prevent. I was hoping Hundley would get 2 long successful drives under his belt. But, Mike made sure Hundley got no more than one.
nerdmann
7 years ago
"Establish the run to set up the pass." Does that mean run every time on first down? 🤣 This is a hige problem with Mike. "Coaching from a textbook" is a good way of putting it.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
PackFanWithTwins
7 years ago
I notice how you cherry pick which plays you "break down". Why didn't you break down the first series first down play or the 3rd series first down play? perhaps because they don't fit your theory?

First series they run on first down and gain 7 yards, Exactly what you would like to do for your backup coming off the bench. 3rd series again they run and get 5 yards, another good first down play to help a young QB. You just picked one that didn't have the same success.

I Have more issue with the first series 2nd down play, I would have like to see maybe a bubble screen or maybe a flair pass to Monty or maybe a quick stop and comeback route on the outside. On 2nd down getting Hundley a completion even if it didn't produce a first down, instead of his first pass being on a 3rd and 2, and making that a tough touch pass for a cold QB.

Overall they ran the ball 7 times on first down out of 17 first down snaps.

MN defense wanted McCarthy to try passing they were going to be loaded in the box every down.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Cheesey
7 years ago
Dang packfanwithtwins.....there you go AGAIN, using LOGIC!
Don't you know by now, there's no place for that in threads like this!🤣
UserPostedImage
musccy
7 years ago
We had no other active QB on the 46. Maybe he was trying to make sure we had a QB going forward this season. The pass pro. was horrendous.

Go ahead and come up with some explanation of how the HC/OC should have game planned for losing both tackles, their top guard, and their HOF QB in the middle of the game. Waste of keystrokes.

After the bye week, I think criticism of Mike McCarthy becomes more realistic. Hopefully both tackles are back, and they can actually game plan for Hundley. When you lose over 1/3 of your starting offense in the middle of the game, I get why it looks a little 5 pounds of dog shit in a 3 pound bag.
nerdmann
7 years ago

We had no other active QB on the 46. Maybe he was trying to make sure we had a QB going forward this season. The pass pro. was horrendous.

Go ahead and come up with some explanation of how the HC/OC should have game planned for losing both tackles, their top guard, and their HOF QB in the middle of the game. Waste of keystrokes.

After the bye week, I think criticism of Mike McCarthy becomes more realistic. Hopefully both tackles are back, and they can actually game plan for Hundley. When you lose over 1/3 of your starting offense in the middle of the game, I get why it looks a little 5 pounds of dog shit in a 3 pound bag.

Originally Posted by: musccy 



They were terrified to roll Hundley out for sure.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
7 years ago
Mike Clemons talked to Mike McCarthy and coach said was trying to not get Brett Hundley killed with the play calls.

Let's remember that Aaron Rodgers had trouble with the starting OL in tact. What are you expecting the backup to do while his OL drops like flies?

UserPostedImage
Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
7 years ago

We had no other active QB on the 46. Maybe he was trying to make sure we had a QB going forward this season. The pass pro. was horrendous.

Go ahead and come up with some explanation of how the HC/OC should have game planned for losing both tackles, their top guard, and their HOF QB in the middle of the game. Waste of keystrokes.

After the bye week, I think criticism of Mike McCarthy becomes more realistic. Hopefully both tackles are back, and they can actually game plan for Hundley. When you lose over 1/3 of your starting offense in the middle of the game, I get why it looks a little 5 pounds of dog shit in a 3 pound bag.

Originally Posted by: musccy 



The best thing to do here is work backwards.

Our OL sucks, period. So what is the ONLY, the SINGLE path to offensive success? Correct, a true WCO passing game!

Let’s build a mythical pass rusher with the speed of Von Miller, the guile and power of Reggie White, the sheer hate of Deacon Jones and the height of Ed Jones. Now, if Hundley gets the ball out in 1.75 to 2.2 seconds, if Ulrick John can just get in his way, alter his path, slow him down as he gets run over; this mythical pass rusher will end the day with ZERO sacks and ZERO pressures. Ulrick will be transformed into a pass pro HOF tackle.

And guess what else happens here? It is IMPOSSIBLE for your QB to get hurt.

Given the OL was intact to start Minny game this part of the game plan may have been dialed down. But, GB kept 3 OLmen up, which means they feared the Tackles might not make the entire game and they lived this the previous 4 weeks. Mike McCarthy should have been able to resurrect this game plan instantly.

EVERY single play, every 4th down decision, every defensive play call needed to be geared toward getting Hundley reps in this quick release WCO. Throw 3 INCs, fine; it’s better than 2 crap runs and a pass running like a banshee and RISKING INJURY [If that’s your concern]. He had 10 drives, and when Hundley held the ball too long on drive #1, he could identified the problems and worked on them in #2, then refined in #3 and refined further in #4, and so forth.

My god Hundley threw a bullet to Cobb for a first; then and beautiful back shoulder to Jordy. He and Jordy saw the exact same thing, were on the exact same page...lets do it again, but this time Jordy fakes the out and runs a dig, I had such anticipation for this play. Nope a stupid run, followed by another stupid run and a punt.

It was a perfect teaching moment gone to crap only because Mike McCarthy was trying to win the game and coaching from a text book. Funny thing is, if he threw caution to the wind, said eff the run, we might have won.
PackFanWithTwins
7 years ago

The best thing to do here is work backwards.

Our OL sucks, period. So what is the ONLY, the SINGLE path to offensive success? Correct, a true WCO passing game!

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



McCarthy's offense is not a WCO anymore.

So you want them to switch to something they haven't practiced? Rather than running the ball.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Barfarn
  • Barfarn
  • Senior Member Topic Starter
7 years ago

McCarthy's offense is not a WCO anymore.

So you want them to switch to something they haven't practiced? Rather than running the ball.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 



You think the game plan GB's run the last few weeks hasnt been practiced, source please or some intellectual support?

No, not instead of. You pass to open up the run.

And "not a WCO anymore;" WTF does that mean? There are no WCO plays in MM's playbook?

Monosyllabic meaningless stupid idiotic labels... Labels that are arbitrarily attached and then they block the mind to see anything else. The Geico Caveman is back 😂, Fire good...WCO gone. Numbchucks, fire can warm food and keep you alive in cold; but it can also burn down your clapboard shack or if you roll into it you die! 99% of things have a variety of characteristics, most, like fire, QB play or playbooks have a full range of characteristics.

There are more "WCO plays" in Mike McCarthy playbook than Walsch's had. Because of the OL, the play calling has CHANGED, it has EVOLVED, They have been practicing more of the shorter routes and implementing them in the game. The perfect example was the Bear game. 2.2 average and a handful of passes took 5-6-7-8 seconds. The mean time to hold the ball was closer to, maybe even below 2 seconds.

So, if WCO is holding you up; lets call it the TWMGO [Throat-Wobbler-Main-Grown Offense].
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (2h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (2h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (5h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (5h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (5h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (5h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (5h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (5h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (5h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (5h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (6h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (7h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (7h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (7h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (7h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (7h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (7h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (8h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (8h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (9h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (9h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (9h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (9h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (10h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (10h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (11h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (11h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (11h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (11h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (11h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (11h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (11h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (12h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (12h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (12h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (12h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (12h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (12h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (12h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (12h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (12h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (12h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (12h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (12h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (12h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (12h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (12h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

10h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.