Barfarn
7 years ago

I certainly rarely read most of those overly verbose posts. If one can't say what they need to say concisely, they simply aren't effective communicators.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



"Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth, upon this continent, a new nation..." Lincoln should have been more concise to effectively communicate šŸ˜‚.

Let's face it, when one hears ā€œPacker fanā€ they don’t think Mensa. See the argument: "I didn't read it, therefore its "overly verbose." Not sure how one can know anything about an argument they didn't read and this omniscient arrogance is doubled down when they bitch about others using too many words, when they themselves us too many words. "Overly verbose" = "verbose."

Fragile Americans have become monosyllabic infant-minded twits. Many have lost the ability to argue with scholarship, integrity and class. If they’re not portending to respond by reorganizing an argument into a dishonest sound-bite; they’re ability to track and intelligently respond to an argument is completely lost.

But, then unable to intellectually respond, many lack the dignity, the grace and respect for TOS of a forum to just be silent…and instead they must exert their monosyllabic rage in an ad homonym attack. Lincoln couldn't have said it better šŸ˜‚.

Look how shameful it was that NPR tweets the Declaration of Independence on America’s B-day and countess monosyllabic Trumptard twits believed NPR was attacking Trump. They obviously saw Trump’s behavior as aligning with that of King George and they couldn’t even process a series of tweets to understand the context. They saw a sentence with pronouns and being unable or unwilling to read more than 40 characters to understand what the pronouns mean, they stewed in their own ignorance. But, they were unable to remain silent; they had to exert their monosyllabic rage in an ad homonym attack. They were so sure they knew were right and won't listen to other perspectives. Such arrogance mixed with a roundhouse lack of intellectual acumen is just starkly unbecoming.

To be effective would today's Declaration of Independence have to say, ā€œKing George…bad…very very bad?ā€
Porforis
7 years ago

Rodgers affects every offensive play, which affects the # of plays the D has to be on the field, which affects them. So, to use your term, I think that means the QB is the center of the universe.

But, your assertion that its then contradictory to then believe Rodgers is not entitled to be an egocentric twat is a very strange argument šŸ˜‚?

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



Why? I don't agree that the QB is as imporant as you're making him out to be but to accept that for the sake of argument, if the entire team lives and dies with Rodgers, why shouldn't the team then revolve around him? Sure, it'd be nice if he was more diplomatic/less whiny about it but at the end of the day, if we're winning then who cares how much of a twat he is?

You gotta lose your need for blame. You cant reduce my argument to monosyllabic misrepresented sound-bites; it is way too COMPLICATED for that. Learn from Smokey: football is the ULTIMATE TEAM game. The thread is about how long Rodgers can keep playing at his current level. Rodgers' performance will determine this and he'll be graded on how he plays his role. Not by how many wins, not by stats and not by how Adams or Randall plays. You say he's been ā€œmeh;ā€ which I guess means [as you stated earlier] that Rodgers chucks it downfield instead of making the first down once every other game, so it’s the exception, not the rule. This just not accurate.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



However, you never seemed to respond to my post explaining how the concept of "rodgers just chucks it downfield all the time and that hurts the team" so I mean really, why should i need to explain this for the 40th time when people are either not going to respond to my argument or as you so concisely put it, reducing my argument to monosyllabic misrepresented sound-bytes? Yes, we all know that at the end of the day stats don't mean jack squat besides wins and losses and even then, you can't assign that stat to an individual player. But ultimately, we're forced with comparing your own PERCEPTIONS and EDUCATED GUESSES with other people's PERCEPTIONS and EDUCATED GUESSES - we can explain ourselves until we're blue in the face but at the end of the day, the only hard facts we DO have is stats. Which again, are of limited use, but they're there and valuable in the correct context.

In last 2 years; he's played disgustingly HORRIBLY at times; very good at others, great occasionally. In crunch time he never plays great, occasionally plays well and often plays poor or outright chokes.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



I agree completely - the same can be said for the defense, or to a much lesser extent special teams. There've been boneheaded playcalls too. You choose to assign the vast majority of the blame to Rodgers in one breath, then switch right back to spouting out how it's a team sport. Your PERCEPTION that Rodgers is not playing HIS ROLE on the field, and thus hurting the team is based on your observation of games - however a great number of people are watching the same games as you, watching practice, etc etc etc and choose to see the situation as far more complex as you sometimes come off as seeing it. To you, when Rodgers chucks it deep, he's being a stat whore if he's passing up someone underneath. To others, they're taking into account how the offense is designed to be timing-based and are choosing to look at things in a more realistic sense. What did the coverage look like pre-snap? Did Rodgers even look at the player to know he's open? Do we KNOW what his progression on that particular play was supposed to be? If it's 2nd and 10 and you've got a 90% chance of completing a 2 yard pass with defenders in the area or a 50% chance (again, based on those pesky stats) of making a 30 yard pass, is it boneheaded or being reasonably aggressive? What happens when that 2nd and 10 becomes 3rd and 7 - does that really help the team move the chains?

Never said Rodgers was responsible for ā€œeverythingā€ and you know it. But, in a TEAM game responsibility is never equally shared. There’s 53 guys and 160M to spend, that’s 3M per. Rodgers is making the wage of more than 7 men; for him to be worth keeping [this is what the thread is about] he has to pull the weight of 7+ men. The last 2 years, he has not. And we all know Rodgers over the last 2 years has not been able to conceal or compensate for his destructive and sociopathic traits. His ability to cope with his mental demons, especially at crunch time, is the key to his continuing to play as long as and like Brady.

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



You never outright said Rodgers was responsible for everything, however, in your last post I see 8 references to Rodgers. You made one reference to the defense as a whole and one to Adams or Randall. This is extremely typical of your posts, in that you keep talking about Rodgers Rodgers Rodgers Rodgers and comparing him to Brady endlessly. This gives off the extremely strong impression that you are fixated on Rodgers, and invariably the only time you EVER bring up anybody else on the team, it's when someone else has first and you're trying to refute how important the defense/coaching/other players on the offense/special teams are. And 9 times out of 10 it eventually leads back to "Rodgers is a stat whoring primadonna that's chucking it deep all the time and hurting the team".

I mean, what are we supposed to think?
Cheesey
7 years ago
I guess he would need for us to LOSE Aaron Rodgers and bring in some lousy quarterback in order for him to "attack" other areas of the team.
Hopefully that won't happen for many more years.
I can wait (hopefully a LONG time in the future) for the Packers to go back to the 1970's and 80's.
UserPostedImage
DoddPower
7 years ago

"Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth, upon this continent, a new nation..." Lincoln should have been more concise to effectively communicate šŸ˜‚.

Let's face it, when one hears ā€œPacker fanā€ they don’t think Mensa. See the argument: "I didn't read it, therefore its "overly verbose." Not sure how one can know anything about an argument they didn't read and this omniscient arrogance is doubled down when they bitch about others using too many words, when they themselves us too many words. "Overly verbose" = "verbose."

Fragile Americans have become monosyllabic infant-minded twits. Many have lost the ability to argue with scholarship, integrity and class. If they’re not portending to respond by reorganizing an argument into a dishonest sound-bite; they’re ability to track and intelligently respond to an argument is completely lost.

But, then unable to intellectually respond, many lack the dignity, the grace and respect for TOS of a forum to just be silent…and instead they must exert their monosyllabic rage in an ad homonym attack. Lincoln couldn't have said it better šŸ˜‚.

Look how shameful it was that NPR tweets the Declaration of Independence on America’s B-day and countess monosyllabic Trumptard twits believed NPR was attacking Trump. They obviously saw Trump’s behavior as aligning with that of King George and they couldn’t even process a series of tweets to understand the context. They saw a sentence with pronouns and being unable or unwilling to read more than 40 characters to understand what the pronouns mean, they stewed in their own ignorance. But, they were unable to remain silent; they had to exert their monosyllabic rage in an ad homonym attack. They were so sure they knew were right and won't listen to other perspectives. Such arrogance mixed with a roundhouse lack of intellectual acumen is just starkly unbecoming.

To be effective would today's Declaration of Independence have to say, ā€œKing George…bad…very very bad?ā€

Originally Posted by: Barfarn 



I'll be sure to get back to this . . . . šŸ‡§šŸ‡«
Cheesey
7 years ago
"Blah blah blah....I hate TRUMP.....blah blah blah"
Even this area of the forum can't escape the constant hate speech of Barfarn.

Why don't you keep this crap in the garbage area of this site, and not corrupt EVERY area of this great site with your babble? You can't back up your dislike of Rodgers with any real factual points, so you revert to attacking the president.
Just a broken record, playing the same garbage over and over and ove.....

You hate Aaron Rodgers....we GET it already. You don't have to keep saying it over and over and ove....
Maybe YOU should be the QB of a professional football team! I mean, it's obvious YOU know more about the position then poor dumb Aaron Rodgers does.
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
7 years ago
10 more years!
Now quit fighting!
šŸ˜„šŸ˜„šŸ˜„šŸ˜„šŸ˜„
I am right!
Actually I am the only one that I read that actually answered the question!
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
DoddPower
7 years ago

"Blah blah blah....I hate TRUMP.....blah blah blah"
Even this area of the forum can't escape the constant hate speech of Barfarn.

Why don't you keep this crap in the garbage area of this site, and not corrupt EVERY area of this great site with your babble? You can't back up your dislike of Rodgers with any real factual points, so you revert to attacking the president.
Just a broken record, playing the same garbage over and over and ove.....

You hate Aaron Rodgers....we GET it already. You don't have to keep saying it over and over and ove....
Maybe YOU should be the QB of a professional football team! I mean, it's obvious YOU know more about the position then poor dumb Aaron Rodgers does.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



You must have read more of the drivel than I did.
Cheesey
7 years ago

You must have read more of the drivel than I did.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



Yeah....it's my own fault. As soon as I see it's a post by Barfarn I should automatically know it will end in the usual expected way.
Just check out his posts, you will see what I mean.
On second thought, don't waste your time. I pretty much summed up what 90% of the posts are.
UserPostedImage
DoddPower
7 years ago

Yeah....it's my own fault. As soon as I see it's a post by Barfarn I should automatically know it will end in the usual expected way.
Just check out his posts, you will see what I mean.
On second thought, don't waste your time. I pretty much summed up what 90% of the posts are.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



lol, don't worry, I won't. But thanks for the warning.
Fan Shout
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt ā€œice coldā€
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm šŸ¤” re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : I might be late on this but Aaron Rodgers is now married
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : Well he can always ask his brother for pointers
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : Bo Melton taking some reps at CB as well as WR
Zero2Cool (10-Jun) : key transactions coming today at 3pm that will consume more cap in 2025
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jaire played in just 34 of a possible 68 games since the start of the 2021 season
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : reported, but not expected to practice
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : Jenkins has REPORTED for mandatory camp
Zero2Cool (9-Jun) : I really thought he'd play for Packers.
buckeyepackfan (9-Jun) : Packers releasing Jaire Alexander.
Mucky Tundra (8-Jun) : (Context: he wants his defense to create turnovers)
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Adam

12-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

12-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.