Wow. I make a true statement that you attack and then you hammer me for redirecting this to my original point?
Originally Posted by: uffda udfa
The original point was about chemistry of scoring 30 points on defenses, which CLEARLY goes out of the scope you are attempting to limit it to. The original point was able Nelson return having a negative impact on scoring 30 points on a teamwhich again CLEARLY goes outside the scope that you are attempting to limit it to.
Your using the very small sample, while CLEARLY ignoring the larger sample...
But playoffs are teams are different... well the Packers beat all four of the NFC playoff teams thatare no longer in it... over those 6 weeks.
The original point was addressed very well and you said you didn't care... you want to focus in on the small negative sample because that's what you do...
Rodgers had a bad start in the Giants game because he kept trying to find the hole to escape the pocket and the Giants were purposely containing Rodgers to keep him in the pocket, which made Rodgers uncomfortable. .. until Rodgers realize this and finally put full trust into his OL's pass protection and the light went on, after Nelson left the game.
So back to the original point... Nelson CLEARLY helps the chemistry of the team... at least it's clear if your smart enough to look outside of the 15 minutes that Rodgers struggled in the Giants game.