Zero2Cool
  • Zero2Cool
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Elite Member Topic Starter
8 years ago
Ty Montgomery has practiced at RB for over a month now and he has a background of being a RB. Stop being bitches about a "WR" playing RB.

Ty Montgomery's background as a running back helps him adapt to his hybrid role with the Packers.

Ty Montgomery was in the stands at Texas Stadium on Oct. 27, 2002, when Emmitt Smith became the NFL’s all-time leading rusher. Montgomery was 9 years old, a Dallas resident and an impressionable Cowboys fan, and he idolized Smith and the man whose record Smith broke.

“I was a big fan of Walter Payton,” Montgomery said. “I had a pair of KangaROOS that I found in a Ross (store), actually. I was a big fan of Earl Campbell. Barry Sanders. Marshall Faulk. Emmitt Smith. And Eddie George, as well.”

As a senior at St. Mark’s School of Texas, Montgomery rushed for 893 yards and averaged nearly 10 yards a carry, but his days as a running back were about to end. At Stanford, he was a receiver and kick returner, and the Green Bay Packers drafted him in the third round in 2015 with those roles in mind.

However, necessity being the mother of invention — and position changes — Montgomery found himself primarily in the backfield Thursday night and played a pivotal role in the Packers’ 26-10 victory over the Chicago Bears.


“It doesn’t matter,” he said. “I can do this for however long.”

Even for the rest of the season?

“Yeah, if I have to,” Montgomery said. “It’s a lot of fun back there. I love it. I just love being on the field with these guys, contributing however I can.”



Continue Reading @ PackersNews 

PackersNews wrote:


UserPostedImage
yooperfan
8 years ago
Now that's a great attitude!😁
steveishere
8 years ago
Mike will bench him whenever Starks gets back.
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
8 years ago

Ty Montgomery has practiced at RB for over a month now and he has a background of being a RB. Stop being bitches about a "WR" playing RB.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Montgomery at half back is out of dire necessity. Maybe we should discuss why that is instead of calling everybody bitches?
UserPostedImage
steveishere
8 years ago

Montgomery at half back is out of dire necessity. Maybe we should discuss why that is instead of calling everybody bitches?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Because the #1 and 3 RB are on IR and #2 out for a couple more weeks. #5 RB was just traded for a few days ago and #4 RB got hurt on like his 2nd run of the game. Montgomery got a shot at RB out of necessity but he should stay there because he's a really good weapon at RB.

The guy is built like a RB and plays the position well. Bitching about the number on his jersey or the fact that a depth chart says WR next to his name is pointless and stupid. If he plays RB he's a RB.
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
8 years ago

Because the #1 and 3 RB are on IR and #2 out for a couple more weeks. #5 RB was just traded for a few days ago and #4 RB got hurt on like his 2nd run of the game. Montgomery got a shot at RB out of necessity but he should stay there because he's a really good weapon at RB.

The guy is built like a RB and plays the position well. Bitching about the number on his jersey or the fact that a depth chart says WR next to his name is pointless and stupid. If he plays RB he's a RB.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



I don't agree that he's built like a running back at all. He's built like a powerhouse WR or small tight end. I don't care about the number on his jersey, I care about the pounding he's taking, and the huge risk this team is taking with one of their stud young receivers.
UserPostedImage
steveishere
8 years ago

I don't agree that he's built like a running back at all. He's built like a powerhouse WR or small tight end. I don't care about the number on his jersey, I care about the pounding he's taking, and the huge risk this team is taking with one of their stud young receivers.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



McCarthy wasn't using him at WR anyways so what risk? He was just being a stud on the bench till he got a shot at RB and now he's been one of our most impactful players the last 2 games.

Montgomery is listed at 6'0" 216lb
Starks 6'2" 218lb
Jackson 5'10" 208lb
Crockett 6'0" 217lb

Lesean McCoy 5'11" 208lb
Demarco Murray 6'1" 220
Melvin Gordon 6'1" 220
Matt Forte 6'1" 218
Adrian Peterson 6'1" 220

A lot of good RB built similarly so I guess I'm not sure what a RB is built like as opposed to a "powerhouse WR" or "small TE"
Zero2Cool
  • Zero2Cool
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Elite Member Topic Starter
8 years ago
That there ^^ some good shit yo


Barry Sanders, the greatest.
5' 8" 203 lbs
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
8 years ago

McCarthy wasn't using him at WR anyways so what risk? He was just being a stud on the bench till he got a shot at RB and now he's been one of our most impactful players the last 2 games.

Montgomery is listed at 6'0" 216lb
Starks 6'2" 218lb
Jackson 5'10" 208lb
Crockett 6'0" 217lb

Lesean McCoy 5'11" 208lb
Demarco Murray 6'1" 220
Melvin Gordon 6'1" 220
Matt Forte 6'1" 218
Adrian Peterson 6'1" 220

A lot of good RB built similarly so I guess I'm not sure what a RB is built like as opposed to a "powerhouse WR" or "small TE"

Originally Posted by: steveishere 




And of course all these running backs carry their weight evenly throughout their body like Montgomery does. Oh wait, no the don't. Running backs carry more weight in their legs and posteriors for power and taking hits to the lower body.

I guess we should have been making Montgomery a running back all this time since he's such a good fit. 🙄

Why can't you guys just admit the Packers are desperate? Is that so difficult?

UserPostedImage
steveishere
8 years ago

And of course all these running backs carry their weight evenly throughout their body like Montgomery does. Oh wait, no the don't. Running backs carry more weight in their legs and posteriors for power and taking hits to the lower body.

I guess we should have been making Montgomery a running back all this time since he's such a good fit. 🙄

Why can't you guys just admit the Packers are desperate? Is that so difficult?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



If they did our offense would have probably been a lot better earlier. They weren't "desperate" when both Lacy and Starks were healthy but Montgomery has been a significantly better option than Starks. McCarthy is just stupidly stubborn sometimes and acts like his post training camp depth chart is permanent.

It's not like Montgomery as a RB came out of nowhere either. Even on this forum go look at the draft thread for him and there were several people suggesting he might be used as a RB.

Also I'd like to know how you know the muscle density in the legs and posterior of all these RBs.
Zero2Cool
  • Zero2Cool
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Elite Member Topic Starter
8 years ago

Why can't you guys just admit the Packers are desperate?Is that so difficult?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 


I think that was stated when someone mentioned all the RB's we have injured, lol. Thankfully, we have Ty Montgomery!!

UserPostedImage
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
8 years ago

I think that was stated when someone mentioned all the RB's we have injured, lol. Thankfully, we have Ty Montgomery!!

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



And we're putting him in a lot of risk of injury. I get the same feeling every time he takes a handoff, I did when Tramon Williams was fielding punts.
UserPostedImage
beast
  • beast
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
8 years ago

And of course all these running backs carry their weight evenly throughout their body like Montgomery does. Oh wait, no the don't. Running backs carry more weight in their legs and posteriors for power and taking hits to the lower body.

I guess we should have been making Montgomery a running back all this time since he's such a good fit. 🙄

Why can't you guys just admit the Packers are desperate? Is that so difficult?

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



The Packers are desperate... then again every team is desperate. NFL wins are hard to get. But yes the Packers are also desperate to get a good healthy RB and CBs right now.

I don't think the whole time, but I think Montgomery makes a pretty good 3rd down RB... and maybe they should have been working him there some. Of course he's been injured (rookie/offseason) and the other example I was thinking about was Hyde, who like Monty, is sorta a tweener. Hyde played at CB as a rookie and didn't switch until his 2nd year... Monty is in his 2nd year now.

Based on his college film, I have also thought maybe they should work Rip in with the TEs some. Rips route running looks average (probably because he hasn't been taught much) but he surprised me with how well he adjusted passes that were off, and he looked like a TE doing so.... so if he learns routes he could be used as both a TE and a FB and while Rip (like a lot of TEs) isn't going to make anyone miss, Rip is willing and able to power run over somebody, which isn't true for our other TEs. And make Rip as versatile as possible... so defenses play calls are less such if he's going to line up as a FB or TE. He also might block better on line from a 3 point stances than the other TEs.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
  • nerdmann
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Premier Member
8 years ago

And we're putting him in a lot of risk of injury. I get the same feeling every time he takes a handoff, I did when Tramon Williams was fielding punts.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Ted is never desperate. If he was he'd have traded for Marshawn back in '07.

Fact is, Montgomery is the type of RB who fits our offense. It's just that Mike prefers big slow guys who can pound up the middle. Mike doesn't have a choice now.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Zero2Cool
  • Zero2Cool
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Elite Member Topic Starter
8 years ago

Ted is never desperate.If he was he'd have traded for Marshawn back in '07.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 


Packers did offer the same compensation as Seahawks, however, Bills felt the Seahawks were going to pick higher in the round therefore took their deal. Why do facts keep getting lost?


And we're putting him in a lot of risk of injury. I get the same feeling every time he takes a handoff, I did when Tramon Williams was fielding punts.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 



Antonio Brown returns punts for the Steelers. Yet, there fans don't whine because they understand you put your best players in position to get the ball in their hands. Hopefully this Knile Davis kid can tote the rock a lot and we can use Ty Montgomery as a wrinkle.

You make it sound like the Packers are using Julio Jones back there. My gosh, Ty is what the fourth or fifth WR? We want the team to adapt to its players and this is FINALLY happening and we're going to cry about risking a player getting injured? This is FOOTBALL. Tough'n up buttercups!!
UserPostedImage
Porforis
  • Porforis
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Veteran Member
8 years ago


Antonio Brown returns punts for the Steelers. Yet, there fans don't whine because they understand you put your best players in position to get the ball in their hands. Hopefully this Knile Davis kid can tote the rock a lot and we can use Ty Montgomery as a wrinkle.

You make it sound like the Packers are using Julio Jones back there. My gosh, Ty is what the fourth or fifth WR? We want the team to adapt to its players and this is FINALLY happening and we're going to cry about risking a player getting injured? This is FOOTBALL. Tough'n up buttercups!!

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I'm conflicted, because I agree that you put the ball into the hands of your best players, but on the other hand the Packers seem to be exceptionally good at injuring players and with the WR corps already struggling and Montgomery looking like he's starting to kick it back into gear, it makes me nervous having him take more of a pounding. In this particular case I'm fine with it, but more because having him in the backfield is also good for the receiving game too if playcalled correctly.

Also, I'm not sure if this is random chance or our return blocking, but it seems like we get very few opportunities to actually return punts, at least this year. Anybody else notice this?
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
8 years ago



Also, I'm not sure if this is random chance or our return blocking, but it seems like we get very few opportunities to actually return punts, at least this year. Anybody else notice this?

Originally Posted by: Porforis 



Our guys blocking the gunners are not getting it done this year. Trevor Davis can only fair catch it seems. But then he laid one on the ground last week so maybe that isn't the worst thing in the world.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
  • DakotaT
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Select Member
8 years ago



You make it sound like the Packers are using Julio Jones back there. My gosh, Ty is what the fourth or fifth WR? We want the team to adapt to its players and this is FINALLY happening and we're going to cry about risking a player getting injured? This is FOOTBALL. Tough'n up buttercups!!

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



It's not like our depth chart at WR isn't in question. Cobb and Nelson need to get going because they are not head and shoulders above Adams and Monte.

Montgomery at RB? I don't like it, and never will.
UserPostedImage
nerdmann
  • nerdmann
  • 100% (Exalted)
  • Premier Member
8 years ago

Packers did offer the same compensation as Seahawks, however, Bills felt the Seahawks were going to pick higher in the round therefore took their deal. Why do facts keep getting lost?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



As I recall, they upped the price at the last minute.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
steveishere
8 years ago
We should use these open roster spots to sign some mediocre FA RBs so we can put Montgomery back on the bench where he won't be at risk of getting injured.
Fan Shout
beast (2h) : Packershome going to the Whiteout unis again
Zero2Cool (8h) : Oh wait, they got Cam Ward. 1st overall right? haha oops
Zero2Cool (8h) : They could send Packers a 1st for a QB they are familiar with
Zero2Cool (8h) : Titans QB Will Levis to have season-ending shoulder surgery
Zero2Cool (19-Jul) : Their season did kind of start there, so 🤷
dfosterf (19-Jul) : Eagles put an engraved Brazil flag on their super bowl rings
Zero2Cool (18-Jul) : Benton unsigned no more
Zero2Cool (17-Jul) : That's good analysis, yes you are getting old. It'd a blessing!
dfosterf (14-Jul) : *analysis* gettin' old
dfosterf (14-Jul) : One of the best analyisis I"ve ever watched at this time of an offseason
dfosterf (14-Jul) : Andy Herman interviewed Warren Sharp on his Pack a day podcast
packerfanoutwest (10-Jul) : Us Padres fans love it....But it'll be a Dodgers/Yankees World Series
Zero2Cool (9-Jul) : Brewers sweep Dodgers. Awesome
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : And James Flanigan is the grandson of Packers Super Bowl winner Jim Flanigan Sr.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jul) : Jerome Bettis and Jim Flanigans sons as well!
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Thomas Davis Jr is OLB, not WR. Oops.
Zero2Cool (6-Jul) : Larry Fitzgeral and Thomas Davis sons too. WR's as well.
Mucky Tundra (5-Jul) : Kaydon Finley, son of Jermichael Finley, commits to Notre Dame
dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

18-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

14-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

10-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

10-Jul / Around The NFL / Zero2Cool

6-Jul / Random Babble / Martha Careful

4-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.