Zero2Cool
8 years ago

Ted had plenty of the so called "failures" but that's how the draft works.
If look at all the successes and failures Ted is really above average, some teams could have drafted randomly and got better results, some teams even seemed to be drafting to get worst. Even the "very good" reams had a lot of failures in their drafts.

I'd say Ted is in the top 10 of the league when drafting. Probably top 5.

Originally Posted by: luigis 



Every team has failures. No team hits on every pick and those who think they knew a player was a "reach" or "bust" at the time are ignorant. No one knows. NO ONE. Fortunately for the Packers, the staff has done a fairly good job in developing the drafted talent for the most part. I think when you've had success, it affords you the opportunity to take some high risk/high reward type players in the draft as well. Not that the Packers seem to do that like I feel the Cardinals did this year in round one. I would have been okay with Packers taking Myles Jack at #27, but then again maybe even if he turns out to be a great player, he wouldn't have been great in the Packers defense? Dom Capers just doesn't seem to scheme around his talent, but rather tries to get his talent to adapt to his scheme.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
8 years ago
I guess I am ignorant. I didn't like the pick in 07. Many many fans didn't. Time proved we and the 15 GMs who passed on the so called top 10 talent were correct.

If you go back to the old site and look at my posts you will see that even before his weight room injury I was against selecting Harrell at 16.

High risk picks are fine in the 4th round. Slight risk in the 1st round especially in the top of the round. Medium risk in round 2 and 3.


UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
8 years ago

I guess I am ignorant. I didn't like the pick in 07. Many many fans didn't. Time proved we and the 15 GMs who passed on the so called top 10 talent were correct.

If you go back to the old site and look at my posts you will see that even before his weight room injury I was against selecting Harrell at 16.

High risk picks are fine in the 4th round. Slight risk in the 1st round especially in the top of the round. Medium risk in round 2 and 3.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Did you watch him in college? Did you evaluate him one on one? Did you read interviews of others who interacted with him? What was your reasoning? None other than to be negative and then years later pump your chest that a kid failed at his dream.

Many people didn't like the Aaron Rodgers pick, how the fuck did that go? Fact of the matter is fans rarely EVER are happy about a pick. Why? Because god for-fucking-bid they are WRONG. But hey, let's come come back years later and boast how we were negative and RIGHT!
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
8 years ago

Did you watch him in college? Did you evaluate him one on one? Did you read interviews of others who interacted with him? What was your reasoning? None other than to be negative and then years later pump your chest that a kid failed at his dream.

Many people didn't like the Aaron Rodgers pick, how the fuck did that go? Fact of the matter is fans rarely EVER are happy about a pick. Why? Because god for-fucking-bid they are WRONG. But hey, let's come come back years later and boast how we were negative and RIGHT!

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Let's start with Rodgers.

I did see a few of his games but not many. I loved the idea of drafting Aaron. I wanted him to sit and watch Brett for 3 years if possible. I knew that not all of the things Brett did were going to be things he would do as well because Brett was unique and unorthodox. But he would be able to learn. I couldn't understand why people were so frustrated that Ted took him. I thought it was a tremendous gift and huge mistake by so many other GMs who were being short sighted. Most of them knew they would not be around in 3 years when Aaron was ready to play so why would they run the risk. Even today you see GMs shove their new qbs out there way too soon because they are fearful of their jobs.

Back to Justin. In a similar manner I didn't watch all of his games but I read about him. There were reports that he took plays off. That he played down to the level of his competition. I didn't see DT was one of the bigger needs. They had Corey Williams and Pick so they were fine. Don't get me wrong, I like getting quality linemen on both sides of the ball. EVERY YEAR is fine with me. But you don't need to draft the fatties in the first round every year.

To my unskilled eye they needed a Safety, OLB and RB more. I wasn't enamored with KGB so I thought they cold use help at DE as well but that was a lesser need.

As far as pumping my chest out at his failed dream. Get real. That is a stupid comment. Why would I ever want any player who wears the Packers Green and Gold to fail? Why would I ever be happy about it or that I thought TeddyT made a mistake with any of his selections even a 7th round pick? That doesn't even make sense. I want every single player to be a HoFer. Obviously it is not possible but I certainly want them all to succeed. All I have ever said is that I didn't think Justin was the best player available at that time nor was he the best player available at a position of greater need.

If I had my druthers I would rather have seen GB take a safety. My hope was for Mike Griffin or Reggie Nelson but then I didn't watch them in college so I wouldn't have known who would have been the best fit in GB. OLB was second on my list. I was only basing that on the reports I read.

Once Justin was selected I shrugged my shoulders and figured Ted knew best. I had hoped that a ferocious rush by the front 4 would mitigate the need for a stud safety. I had hoped he was right in taking the gamble on an often injured player and that the reports I read were not correct.

UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
8 years ago
2005 I remember everyone bemoaning the foolish S Nick Collins pick, who (coincidentally) the Ravens phoned the Packers saying congrats on picking.

2006 I wanted WR Chad Jackson over WR Greg Jennings. I was not right. (stupid ESPN got me!!)

2008 people were pissed off about Jordy Nelson pick, lol. Not nearly as pissed as the Brian Brohm pick! haha

Oh, I was CERTAIN the few clips I seen between Eddie Lacy and Johnathan Franklin proved enough insight that Franklin would be the ball-carrier of the future, not Lacy. I was certain the 2015 Lacy was the Lacy we'd get from day one. I was not right.

Desmond Howard and Charles Woodson are the only players that I really sought out to watch in college. I did like Noel Devine for a bit, but I just don't get much college game tape through these eyes for too many good objective analysis. I have watched Badgers games, but I know not to speak on that because ... well ... I'm a bit of a Badger homer and openly admit as much. 🙂
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
8 years ago
Yes the average person including media types get things wrong. I remember people being upset with Nick. I don't remember myself. I do remember being worried if it would workout for him after a yr or two.

I trusted Ted on the Jennings and Nelson picks but I wasn't sure. I knew you liked Franklin. I wanted Lacy and was pleased Franklin was thrown in on the deal.

For the most part I can take Teddy's selections. I simply don't like taking a guy who had injuries @ 16. I didn't mind taking Hawk as there didn't seem to be a lot of options and they needed an ILBer.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
8 years ago

Yes the average person including media types get things wrong. I remember people being upset with Nick. I don't remember myself. I do remember being worried if it would workout for him after a yr or two.

I trusted Ted on the Jennings and Nelson picks but I wasn't sure. I knew you liked Franklin. I wanted Lacy and was pleased Franklin was thrown in on the deal.

For the most part I can take Teddy's selections. I simply don't like taking a guy who had injuries @ 16. I didn't mind taking Hawk as there didn't seem to be a lot of options and they needed an ILBer.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



I was pretty pissed about the Greg Jennings pick, lol. I freaking completely let ESPN run the space between my ears. I haven't let myself get on the hype/negative train since. There is just tooo much going on behind the scenes that we don't know about. I mean, maybe the HYPE'd player showed lack of passion in interviews? Or maybe the position coach doesn't feel he can coach him up? Or gosh any multitude of things that just negate the whole scenario of predicting a player is going to flop. I feel we all forget at times that these are kids ranging from 19-24 or so going from no money to raking in six figures. If we try to gloss over that as if it matters nothing, we are stupid. That's the kicker that we just keep forgetting about ... what will the MONEY do to the KID?

We may get lucky GUESSING from time to time, but it's absolutely no more valuable than a broken clock striking true twice a day.


Edit, just remembered another guy I completely whiffed on. Chris Darkins. I was so damn high on him, I thought he was going to be 1,000 yard back for sure and catching it out of the backfield. LeShaun Johnson too, but I admit that was more because he freaking owned it on Madden with the toss sweep! lol
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (18h) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (23h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
20h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.