Oh yeah!

---

I'm starting think certain people enjoy the Packers losing so they can say "see how important the old QB was afterall?" and when we win now the Packers get no credit as a team.

---

---

CSAers...I keep tellin' folks. CSAers.

nahhhhhhhhhhhh


No one gloats when the Packers lose

Nahhhhhhhhh

well... you think wrong

---

LOL

ok

That didn't take long... for someone to prove my thought correct. That saddens me.

---

Thats EXACTLY it.
They want the Packers to lose so they can say "SEE?? SEE???? I TOLD you the Packers couldn't win without Favre!!!!"
They WANT Rodgers to fail. And when he DOES do good (like last Sunday) they REFUSE to give the guy ANY credit. ONLY when they lose does AR get ALL the "credit".
He threw ONE meaningless INT. Lets see........who has thrown not only more INT's then ANYONE in NFL history, but more then AR has this year?
So that "other" QB got bailed out more then AR has so far by his team.
Now the Packer TEAM plays well, AR gets to show he's pretty darn good, but he deserves none of the credit........no surprise there, seeing as WHO is making those comments. Didn'y Favre lose the last 4 times we played the Bears at Lambeau? I believe he threw some pretty important INT's during that span.
A first year starter that has his team in 1st place 10 games into the season.......but he sucks.

---

The time of that INT by Rodgers was bad. Yes, at the end it was meaningless, but when you throw an INT when you're one first down away from FG range, that's bad.

I do agree too much credit gets put on QB's shoulders, good and bad.

---