Zero2Cool
9 years ago
The grading matches up with what we see on Sunday. Packers Guards are playing well, but the rest of the offensive-line is failing to hold up even medicorcy.

Center
Corey Linsley
[list]
  • Overall: 15th
  • Pass Block: 12th
    Run Block: 18th [/list]
    J.C. Tretter
    [list]
  • Overall: 73rd
  • Pass Block: 20th
    Run Block: 15th [/list]

    Guards
    Josh Sitton
    [list]
  • Overall: 4th
  • Pass Block: 1st
    Run Block: 24th [/list]
    T.J. Lang
    [list]
  • Overall: 9th
  • Pass Block: 3rd
    Run Block: 30th [/list]

    Tackles
    David Bakhtiari
    [list]
  • Overall: 26th
  • Pass Block: 19th
    Run Block: 90th[/list]
    Bryan Bulaga
    [list]
  • Overall: 31st
  • Pass Block: 27th
    Run Block: 109th[/list]

    Source: ProFootballFocus.com
    UserPostedImage
    buckeyepackfan
    9 years ago
    Do they put up numbers as a unit?

    Just trying to figure out how Bulaga is 109th in run blocking?

    I'm guessing The Packers just don't run to the right that much and when they do hasn't been that effective?

    Linsley's numbers would seem to be better than mediocre if these are overall numbers.

    I'm guessing there are a minimum of 320 players being graded.

    Does the full chart have the total number of players being graded?

    Does that include guys like Josh Walker, who has played a minimum of plays?

    Is the number of plays a players has participated being figured into the equation?
    I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
    Zero2Cool
    9 years ago

    Do they put up numbers as a unit?

    Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



    I won't pay for the information anymore. When it was $20 a year, it was entertaining, but now they want $1,200 and that ain't gonna fly.

    They put those ratings into that big bucks category and stuck us with 'grades' of 0-100. Kind of a joke to me. What I liked about them was the transparency of where you could see a breakdown on how each player earned that rating. A player could get a rating of -1.5 one game and then the next get +2.4 if they did really well. Something like that. You could then break down to see why. Maybe they went against J.J. Watt and he ate them for lunch?

    Either way, the grades they have now are fractionally interesting at best and the breakdown stuff I mentioned is just too rich for my hobbyist blood.
    UserPostedImage
    DakotaT
    9 years ago

    I won't pay for the information anymore. When it was $20 a year, it was entertaining, but now they want $1,200 and that ain't gonna fly.

    They put those ratings into that big bucks category and stuck us with 'grades' of 0-100. Kind of a joke to me. What I liked about them was the transparency of where you could see a breakdown on how each player earned that rating. A player could get a rating of -1.5 one game and then the next get +2.4 if they did really well. Something like that. You could then break down to see why. Maybe they went against J.J. Watt and he ate them for lunch?

    Either way, the grades they have now are fractionally interesting at best and the breakdown stuff I mentioned is just too rich for my hobbyist blood.

    Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



    Tight ass! That's just a drop in the bucket for a guy like you isn't it? šŸ˜
    UserPostedImage
    yooperfan
    9 years ago
    Wow, Bulaga and Bahktiari graded out better than I expected.
    What a studley offensive line!
    And folks want to blame Aaron Rodgers and Eddie Lacy for not getting the job done.
    To think the backups are even worse is maddening.
    You're doing a helluva job Ted.
    Fan Shout
    Mucky Tundra (12h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
    packerfanoutwest (18h) : Feliz Navidad!
    Zero2Cool (23h) : Merry Christmas!
    beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas šŸŽ„šŸŽ
    beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
    Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
    Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
    buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
    buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
    Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
    Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
    packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
    beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
    beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
    bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
    beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
    Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    20h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

    24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

    24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright Ā© 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.comā„¢. All Rights Reserved.