Zero2Cool
9 years ago
The grading matches up with what we see on Sunday. Packers Guards are playing well, but the rest of the offensive-line is failing to hold up even medicorcy.

Center
Corey Linsley
[list]
  • Overall: 15th
  • Pass Block: 12th
    Run Block: 18th [/list]
    J.C. Tretter
    [list]
  • Overall: 73rd
  • Pass Block: 20th
    Run Block: 15th [/list]

    Guards
    Josh Sitton
    [list]
  • Overall: 4th
  • Pass Block: 1st
    Run Block: 24th [/list]
    T.J. Lang
    [list]
  • Overall: 9th
  • Pass Block: 3rd
    Run Block: 30th [/list]

    Tackles
    David Bakhtiari
    [list]
  • Overall: 26th
  • Pass Block: 19th
    Run Block: 90th[/list]
    Bryan Bulaga
    [list]
  • Overall: 31st
  • Pass Block: 27th
    Run Block: 109th[/list]

    Source: ProFootballFocus.com
    UserPostedImage
    buckeyepackfan
    9 years ago
    Do they put up numbers as a unit?

    Just trying to figure out how Bulaga is 109th in run blocking?

    I'm guessing The Packers just don't run to the right that much and when they do hasn't been that effective?

    Linsley's numbers would seem to be better than mediocre if these are overall numbers.

    I'm guessing there are a minimum of 320 players being graded.

    Does the full chart have the total number of players being graded?

    Does that include guys like Josh Walker, who has played a minimum of plays?

    Is the number of plays a players has participated being figured into the equation?
    I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
    Zero2Cool
    9 years ago

    Do they put up numbers as a unit?

    Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



    I won't pay for the information anymore. When it was $20 a year, it was entertaining, but now they want $1,200 and that ain't gonna fly.

    They put those ratings into that big bucks category and stuck us with 'grades' of 0-100. Kind of a joke to me. What I liked about them was the transparency of where you could see a breakdown on how each player earned that rating. A player could get a rating of -1.5 one game and then the next get +2.4 if they did really well. Something like that. You could then break down to see why. Maybe they went against J.J. Watt and he ate them for lunch?

    Either way, the grades they have now are fractionally interesting at best and the breakdown stuff I mentioned is just too rich for my hobbyist blood.
    UserPostedImage
    DakotaT
    9 years ago

    I won't pay for the information anymore. When it was $20 a year, it was entertaining, but now they want $1,200 and that ain't gonna fly.

    They put those ratings into that big bucks category and stuck us with 'grades' of 0-100. Kind of a joke to me. What I liked about them was the transparency of where you could see a breakdown on how each player earned that rating. A player could get a rating of -1.5 one game and then the next get +2.4 if they did really well. Something like that. You could then break down to see why. Maybe they went against J.J. Watt and he ate them for lunch?

    Either way, the grades they have now are fractionally interesting at best and the breakdown stuff I mentioned is just too rich for my hobbyist blood.

    Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



    Tight ass! That's just a drop in the bucket for a guy like you isn't it? 😝
    UserPostedImage
    yooperfan
    9 years ago
    Wow, Bulaga and Bahktiari graded out better than I expected.
    What a studley offensive line!
    And folks want to blame Aaron Rodgers and Eddie Lacy for not getting the job done.
    To think the backups are even worse is maddening.
    You're doing a helluva job Ted.
    Fan Shout
    packerfanoutwest (2h) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns
    packerfanoutwest (2h) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,
    beast (13h) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)
    beast (18h) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
    Zero2Cool (21h) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
    Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
    Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
    Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
    beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
    Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
    dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
    beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
    Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
    Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
    beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
    beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
    wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
    wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
    wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
    Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
    Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
    Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
    dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
    beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
    beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
    beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
    beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
    beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
    wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
    wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
    wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
    Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
    Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
    Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
    Eagles
    Recent Topics
    2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / hardrocker950

    21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    25-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.