nerdmann
9 years ago
Alot of the shit talk about this offense is based on the idea that we are unable to throw deep. I do not believe this to be the case.

1: Do we have players who can stretch the field?

YES: Ty Montgomery. Kennard Backman. Jeff Janis. But hey, all of our guys run at least a 4.5. That's what Jordy ran. Hell, I'm pretty sure Cobb ran a 4.4. There is no reason any of these guys cannot get deep.

2: Aaron holding the ball: Aaron ALWAYS holds the ball too long.

The problem now is that, rushers are not getting pushed back with the flow. They are pursuing no more deeply that AAron drops back. They will not allow themselves to be pushed back around Aaron, so he has nowhere to step up. This is keeping him contained in a collapsing pocket.

Previously, Aaron had been scripting his roll outs, based on the OLBs and DEs getting pushed around him by our Ts. But defenses have adjusted. WEEKS ago. I think this goes back to the Chiefs game. However our offense has NOT adjusted. It makes you wonder if they even WATCH film. Do NOT plan to roll out, if teams are purposely preventing you from doing so.

But we all know there's never gonna be any misdrection. No traps, to enema draw, only a few token screens, ran with 11 in the box. That goes back to throwing deep.

3: "Guys can't get open." Another line of bullshit. Mike knows he is not smart enough to scheme guys open. This means that they scheme exclusively for match ups. The problem here is that against a defense like we played against yesterday, those DBs are pretty good. So you want to at least TRY to scheme guys open. Normally Aaron just throws the ball up and expects the guys to make a play on the ball. But between holding it for 8 seconds in a collapsing pocket and not trusting his guys to be able to come down with it against good DBs, he's getting sacked and having to just throw it away.

4: Whatever happened to the concept of the PUMP FAKE? Or the DOUBLE MOVE? Granted, sometimes this necessitates holding the ball a little longer than you'd like (albeit rarely for Aaron's customary 8 seconds.) But getting deep doesn't mean you have to have a Randy Moss type guy who's 6'2"+ and runs a 4.2. Jordy's not that fast. Jordy gets deep mainly on double moves, but also on pump fakes. When's the last time you saw Aaron pump fake? You don't think a DB is gonna jump or make a false step as soon as Aaron cocks his arm? Because if you look at the film, you're not gonna see Aaron pump faking that much. So they know when he cocks that arm, the ball's really coming out.

5: 11 in the box: These defenses are putting all their guys up at the LoS. They are challenging the Packers to throw it deep. They are DARING the Packers to TRY. This is when you come with the PUMP FAKE. This is when you come with the STOP AND GO. This is when you come with the DOUBLE MOVE. As I've said, we do have guys who can flat out run. But we don't HAVE to use those guys if they're not ready, or in the case of Montgomery, if he's hurt.

But fake those bitches out. Help your WRs.

6: Hard Count: This is another tool in your arsenal. Yesterday we caught them on a few. I think we had one 12 men penalty (also with an offside) and then I think we had an additional two neutral zone infractions. Aaron obviously refuses to run any more than an occasional token RB screen, or any draw or trap plays whatsoever, but one thing he does do is he uses his cadence to keep the Dline off balance.

The Dline will usually start out a game playing aggressively. Aaron will use this to provoke them into jumping offsides. The Dline will then catch on to this, and they will begin to hold back a little. Once they do this, Aaron will go with the quick count and get a half a second edge on them. Then they start to be more aggressive again, and Aaron can catch them offsides once more.

Therefore I conclude that the concept of misdirection is not foreign to Aaron. Why not do this same thing to DBs, with pump fakes and double moves? Sure, the back shoulder is great, but that's basically sandlot football. You haven't been playing with Davante for 8 years yet. Wait until you develop that before you begin relying on it exclusively.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
texaspackerbacker
9 years ago
Not a word about the REAL problem - the OFFENSIVE LINE.

You can't throw deep; Hell, you can barely throw short when you have about a half second before the pass rushers are on you. And why was Denver able to do such a damn good job in coverage? Because with our sick excuse for an O Line, it didn't take a whole lot of extra people coming in; They mostly did it with no more than their D Line - everybody else can drop back in coverage and the pass rush still gets right in.

In contrast, the Packers have to put together a bunch of intricate blitz packages just to get close, and even then they couldn't get to a slow old QB. And this was against a messed up by injury/rebuilt O Line - same as with San Diego. WHY can those teams and pretty much every other piece something together and make it work, while we, with the best O Linemen we have fairly healthy and together, STILL play like absolute crap - both pass blocking and run blocking or the lack of either? Is it piss poor O Line coaching? Is it crap for personnel?

Is anybody STILL in denial that the problem is the O Line?
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
luigis
9 years ago

Not a word about the REAL problem - the OFFENSIVE LINE.

You can't throw deep; Hell, you can barely throw short when you have about a half second before the pass rushers are on you. And why was Denver able to do such a damn good job in coverage? Because with our sick excuse for an O Line, it didn't take a whole lot of extra people coming in; They mostly did it with no more than their D Line - everybody else can drop back in coverage and the pass rush still gets right in.

In contrast, the Packers have to put together a bunch of intricate blitz packages just to get close, and even then they couldn't get to a slow old QB. And this was against a messed up by injury/rebuilt O Line - same as with San Diego. WHY can those teams and pretty much every other piece something together and make it work, while we, with the best O Linemen we have fairly healthy and together, STILL play like absolute crap - both pass blocking and run blocking or the lack of either? Is it piss poor O Line coaching? Is it crap for personnel?

Is anybody STILL in denial that the problem is the O Line?

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 



Texas I agree with you but it's not about the OL, it's about coaching (and Rodgers). Our OL has the problems you mention but it is much better than the Chargers OL. We just have to plan for it. Quick passes and let Cobb and JJ try to beat them 1 on 1 we know they can.
The problem is that this leads to some potential interceptions but it also leads to some potential big plays.

The whole plan last night was ridiculous and after seeing a couple of plays Rodgers should have changed it like it or not. The routes were never going to develop because we didn't have enough time and the WRs were not going to get open because they have a good secondary, just throw the ball to Cobb or Jones and let them make a play. We can't win if we don't even try.

Luis
blueleopard
9 years ago
Aaron wasn't playing like the surgeon of a pocket passer that Tom Brady and Peyton Manning are. Instead he kept on relying on his athleticism to make plays.

Aaron is so reliant on this, he pisses on the route tree and waits for his receivers to get open, which has now become the most predictable thing the Packers offense do. All the DB's have to do is stay in close proximity of the WR's and Rodgers won't dare throw their direction.
Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings
PackFanWithTwins
9 years ago
With no creativity in play calling, no they can't. What happened to the staple of the west coast offense, the slant. Which is as good as a run, and sets up Slugo's. this offense only does a few things, plays up the sidelines where they try to use the backshoulder, bubble screens, drags with cobb and scramble drills.

time to change up what is being done because it isn't working.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
nerdmann
9 years ago

Texas I agree with you but it's not about the OL, it's about coaching (and Rodgers). Our OL has the problems you mention but it is much better than the Chargers OL. We just have to plan for it. Quick passes and let Cobb and JJ try to beat them 1 on 1 we know they can.
The problem is that this leads to some potential interceptions but it also leads to some potential big plays.

The whole plan last night was ridiculous and after seeing a couple of plays Rodgers should have changed it like it or not. The routes were never going to develop because we didn't have enough time and the WRs were not going to get open because they have a good secondary, just throw the ball to Cobb or Jones and let them make a play. We can't win if we don't even try.

Originally Posted by: luigis 



The interior is fine, the Ts are suspect. Fact is, Aaron holding onto the ball way longer than Manning or Rivers.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
luigis
9 years ago

Aaron wasn't playing like the surgeon of a pocket passer that Tom Brady and Peyton Manning are. Instead he kept on relying on his athleticism to make plays.

Aaron is so reliant on this, he pisses on the route tree and waits for his receivers to get open, which has now become the most predictable thing the Packers offense do. All the DB's have to do is stay in close proximity of the WR's and Rodgers won't dare throw their direction.

Originally Posted by: blueleopard 



+1 I like how you put it, if the defense keeps a guy near a WR Rodgers wont throw it there. Considering we have JJ and Cobb this is mind boggling, it's like saying you prefer to lose and have 0 INTs rather than try to win and be picked a couple of times.

Luis
nerdmann
9 years ago

+1 I like how you put it, if the defense keeps a guy near a WR Rodgers wont throw it there. Considering we have JJ and Cobb this is mind boggling, it's like saying you prefer to lose and have 0 INTs rather than try to win and be picked a couple of times.

Originally Posted by: luigis 



#statwhore

That is an issue, but for me the primary issue is not being psychologically prepared for football games.

However I do believe we have the ability to strike deep. Bunch for,actions, rubs, picks. Slants would be great.

But Ds are putting 11 in the box. If Aaron's gonna hold it for 8 seconds anyway, why not pump fake and throw over their heads?
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
nerdmann
9 years ago
How about a goddamn flea flicker, if that's what it takes?

With 11 in the box, they're gonna converge on Lacy.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
PackFanWithTwins
9 years ago

#statwhore

That is an issue, but for me the primary issue is not being psychologically prepared for football games.

However I do believe we have the ability to strike deep. Bunch for,actions, rubs, picks. Slants would be great.

But Ds are putting 11 in the box. If Aaron's gonna hold it for 8 seconds anyway, why not pump fake and throw over their heads?

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



They only had 10 in the box

But damn those are perfect times to throw the slant. If the DB on the receiver doesn't make the tackle that leaves on Safety to stop a TD.

There is one primary reason they don't throw the quick slant. Shotgun/pistol. the WR either needs to wait or take a step before making his move, unlike with Favre, Montana, Young who from under center were able to take one step and throw and the WR was able to go directly into the slant before the DB can get his hands on them.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (21h) : @AaronNagler · 2m Both Jordan Love and Malik Willis were Limited participants at Packers practice today.
Zero2Cool (23h) : Johnson didn't make it until 2020. Ring 2023. 🤷 Personally, he should have been in years prior to Hall.
Zero2Cool (23h) : HUMP DAY
beast (8-Jan) : Guys that have a good shot at making the NFL Hall of Fame usually get into their teams pretty fast
beast (8-Jan) : Yeah, but is Kampman and the others in the NFL Hall of Fame?
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Johnson was Hall of Fame, 2020. Should haev been in Ring a year later, not three years.
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : I could be wrong there though
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Guys like Kampman, Tim Harris, Al Harris, etc all over 15 years. Hall of Fame is 5 year wait
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : I guess I see players in Packers Hall come way later
beast (8-Jan) : Yeah, usually teams hall of fames are a much lower bar than the NFL
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : is it uncommon for Hall before Ring?
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : S Xavier McKinney named first-team All-Pro by NFLPA
beast (8-Jan) : I missed it, sorry, but he got into the NFL Hall of Fame years before that
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Jones took his sweet ole time!
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Yeah, he's in the ring of honor, just saw video and his name is up there
Zero2Cool (8-Jan) : Didn't they have a thing in 2023 for Jimmy's ring of honor? I swear I saw it
beast (8-Jan) : Though if they're legitimately trying to re-sign MM, then it makes sense.
beast (8-Jan) : Jerry Jones still hasn't put Jimmy Johnson in the Ring of Honor, but he's in the NFL's Hall of Fame, Jones is petty
Mucky Tundra (8-Jan) : Unless the Cowboys are planning an extension, seems kinda petty
beast (8-Jan) : Cowboys denied Bears request
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : McCarthy let go or not extended??
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : The winners page that is
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats beast on 2024 !
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
Martha Careful (6-Jan) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : BALL DON'T LIE
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero I looked through earlier and noticed the same thing. Bonkers year. I just wonder if beast put any money on games
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I'm hoping for BLOODBATH. Pummel one another.
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 8 people in pick'em would have won any year with their total lol
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : I'm rooting for the Lions to lose.
Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : God help me but I'm rooting for the Vikings to...Vikings to...Christ I can't say it
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 4 td for Rodgers
Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Chiefs got shutout
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

8-Jan / Around The NFL / beast

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

7-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6-Jan / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

3-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.