We lost our two first road games last season.
In game #1 every team thinks they can beat any other team, even the Jaguars.

But I've found some positive things too:
- Aj Hawk won't be there
- Brad Jones won't be there
- Burnett might not play

Originally Posted by: luigis 

Which is precisely why it can't be ruled out.

No more bullshit this year man. Including starting slow.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 

Don't talk to me, I'm just a spectator, who never provides any stats.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 

Didn't you mean to say "any evidence"?

(evil grin)

Originally Posted by: Wade 

Burnett is a hell of a lot better than Micah Hyde. I don't see how that's a positive.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 

What's Burnett's problem - I haven't heard.

Jeffrey is damn good when healthy (although maybe not as good without Marshall on the other side). The Bears are worse off without him than the Packers would be without Burnett.

I think Cutler has a rare good game as the Packers game plan more to stop the run and with Fox coaching. Also, it is worrisome that the Packers #1 D was so awful against passing in the preseason (I still say, though, Dom was playing it plain vanilla then). Just the same, I think the Packers outscore the Bears about 38 - 24.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 

What's Burnett's problem - I haven't heard.

Jeffrey is damn good when healthy (although maybe not as good without Marshall on the other side). The Bears are worse off without him than the Packers would be without Burnett.

I think Cutler has a rare good game as the Packers game plan more to stop the run and with Fox coaching. Also, it is worrisome that the Packers #1 D was so awful against passing in the preseason (I still say, though, Dom was playing it plain vanilla then). Just the same, I think the Packers outscore the Bears about 38 - 24.

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker