Rolle was not Htn’s Nickel back, he actually stunk.

INTs are not an important stat for a CB; often it’s a negative indicator of performance. The perfect CB is 100% statless; because coverage is so tight, no one even throws his way. Due to a rash of injuries; Rolle played in parts of 4 games, 9-12, got 3 picks and then is benched the last 4 games. BENCHED [He had 10 meaningless snaps in last 4 games]! In last 4, he wasn't even allowed to play in dime w/ Andre Hal out [a guy clearly ahead of him on D. Chart]. QB passer rating v. Rolle was 90; which is unbelievable high w/ 3INTs in so few snaps. When Rolle didn’t intercept, QBs had 147.5 rating throwing his way. And the QBs that Rolle was trying to get enshrined in Canton were Sanchez, Hoyer, Dalton and Mettenbeger/Locker. Fact is Rolle stunk against some pretty bad QBs and that is why he was BENCHED and why today Rolle sits #7 or 8 on the Texans CB depth chart depending on who ya ask. Unless multiple injuries occur or he becomes Htn's Jerrat Bush, Rolle will be cut.

Remember, in practice/camp, WRs have a huge advantage over cover guys. The WR knows even in pads no one is gonna try to separate his head from his shoulders. Also, remember this reporter is making this judgment from bleachers through a fence at least 30 yards away with no film to review. Only the perfect angle unobstructed will show how much separation the WR got. W/o film this reporter has zero chance to evaluate Goodson’s role in the scheme and how Goodson performed in that role. The reporter can only judge the result, which in this situation is very close to meaningless. Rolle peaked last camp; Goodson had upside; that’s why he was kept. In a few weeks [and you did allude to this Musccy in another post in the thread] we’ll see how much or little Goodson has improved and that will determine if he makes 53 in year two, not a meaningless camp snippet.