Olivia Munn ruined Aaron Rodgers· Page 10

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

So because Aaron doesn't like to talk about his personal life means he is mentally weak? This has to be the most ludacris thing I have read in years.

Look out - it has been revealed that a grown ass man has sex with his girlfriend! That means he will never play at a high level again! Might as well cut him now and draft a QB since he is done for.

[wallme]

Originally Posted by: hardrocker950

Comprehension is a lost art. Man, is it just sad reading some of these "witty" replies that don't grasp the concept of what was said in the first place. It is worse than watching MM run the ball on 2nd and 10 over and over and over.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

blueleopard
Member

10 years ago

#92

Who gives a fuck?

We lost because we kept throwing the ball when we were clearly running the ball well and Rodgers was clearly not having a good day. Drops galore made things even worse.

Olivia Munn? The only time she should ever be mentioned is because she's damn hot.

Carry on with regular discussion that actually makes sense to the football community. Thanks.

Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings

RaiderPride
Senior Member

10 years ago

#93

Comprehension is a lost art.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

From you? "Comprehension is a lost art."

Be a trooper for us all... Try a balance of conception and intellectual comprehension the next time your fingers hit the keyboard.

Many readers here may then at least try to see and understand your gibberish.

""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

#94

Originally Posted by: RaiderPride

Good looking out Raider. Yup...gibberish. So plain a child could grasp the concept of what is being said. Not the witty responders, here, though.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

DakotaT
Select Member

10 years ago

#95

Good looking out Raider. Yup...gibberish. So plain a child could grasp the concept of what is being said. Not the witty responders, here, though.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

It seems the bleed green and gold crew don't care for your constructive criticism, but keep them riled up for me - they are all better posters when agitated. [rockon]

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

#96

It seems the bleed green and gold crew don't care for your constructive criticism, but keep them riled up for me - they are all better posters when agitated. [rockon]

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

Ha! I will try to stay confined to this thread and maybe a select few others. If we lose to Tampa, that will be a ball here. Posts aplenty about how we still have a chance and are not out of it yet.

Hopefully, Aaron will work out what he needs to with Olivia so he can focus better on football. He is 0-2 in Tampa...3 picks in both games. Not his favorite place to play for some reason. You would think a warm outdoor environment would benefit him but it really doesn't seem to.

The season rides on SNF... Arizona has to pull a major upset with Ryan freaking Lindley at QB. I'll be like I was on happy pills if Cards somehow win that one. I don't think we're that lucky.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

musccy
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#97

The season rides on SNF... Arizona has to pull a major upset with Ryan freaking Lindley at QB. I'll be like I was on happy pills if Cards somehow win that one. I don't think we're that lucky.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

I'm confused. As you've stated in other threads, the loss to the Bills already sealed the Packers' fate, and proved...as in scientific fact, like liquid water is wet kind of proof...that the Packers can't advance in the playoffs.

...so...why would you care about the outcome of SNF. Why would you be on happy pills? The Packers are on the undeniable path to a tragic inevitability anyway, right???

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

#98

Originally Posted by: musccy

Yup...IF they aren't the 1 seed.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

musccy
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#99

Yup...IF they aren't the 1 seed.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

You never said that before. I thought it was utterly impossible to defeat Seattle whether played in gb, sea, or a neutral field. I thought Uncle Ted already put this team on the path to the #1 pick in the draft. I thought it was already determined this team has no hope except for the blind devotion rah rah green and gold Kool aid slurpers.

hardrocker950
Member

10 years ago

#100

Comprehension is a lost art. Man, is it just sad reading some of these "witty" replies that don't grasp the concept of what was said in the first place. It is worse than watching Mike McCarthy run the ball on 2nd and 10 over and over and over.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

I really don't see how my post shows lack of comprehension. Just because you say one thing and somehow want it to mean something else does not make you bright. Aside from that point - maybe some of us are posting sarcastic responses because this topic is stupid anyway.[duh]

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

beast (7h) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb

wpr (9-Apr) : yay

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'

Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24