Olivia Munn ruined Aaron Rodgers· Page 10

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

So because Aaron doesn't like to talk about his personal life means he is mentally weak? This has to be the most ludacris thing I have read in years.

Look out - it has been revealed that a grown ass man has sex with his girlfriend! That means he will never play at a high level again! Might as well cut him now and draft a QB since he is done for.

[wallme]

Originally Posted by: hardrocker950

Comprehension is a lost art. Man, is it just sad reading some of these "witty" replies that don't grasp the concept of what was said in the first place. It is worse than watching Mike McCarthy run the ball on 2nd and 10 over and over and over.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

blueleopard
Member

10 years ago

#92

Who gives a fuck?

We lost because we kept throwing the ball when we were clearly running the ball well and Rodgers was clearly not having a good day. Drops galore made things even worse.

Olivia Munn? The only time she should ever be mentioned is because she's damn hot.

Carry on with regular discussion that actually makes sense to the football community. Thanks.

Danreb Victorio A Believer of Greg Jennings

RaiderPride
Senior Member

10 years ago

#93

Comprehension is a lost art.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

From you? "Comprehension is a lost art."

Be a trooper for us all... Try a balance of conception and intellectual comprehension the next time your fingers hit the keyboard.

Many readers here may then at least try to see and understand your gibberish.

""People Will Probably Never Remember What You Said, And May Never Remember What You Did. However, People Will Always Remember How You Made Them Feel."

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

#94

Originally Posted by: RaiderPride

Good looking out Raider. Yup...gibberish. So plain a child could grasp the concept of what is being said. Not the witty responders, here, though.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

DakotaT
Select Member

10 years ago

#95

Good looking out Raider. Yup...gibberish. So plain a child could grasp the concept of what is being said. Not the witty responders, here, though.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

It seems the bleed green and gold crew don't care for your constructive criticism, but keep them riled up for me - they are all better posters when agitated. [rockon]

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

#96

It seems the bleed green and gold crew don't care for your constructive criticism, but keep them riled up for me - they are all better posters when agitated. [rockon]

Originally Posted by: DakotaT

Ha! I will try to stay confined to this thread and maybe a select few others. If we lose to Tampa, that will be a ball here. Posts aplenty about how we still have a chance and are not out of it yet.

Hopefully, Aaron will work out what he needs to with Olivia so he can focus better on football. He is 0-2 in Tampa...3 picks in both games. Not his favorite place to play for some reason. You would think a warm outdoor environment would benefit him but it really doesn't seem to.

The season rides on SNF... Arizona has to pull a major upset with Ryan freaking Lindley at QB. I'll be like I was on happy pills if Cards somehow win that one. I don't think we're that lucky.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

musccy
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#97

The season rides on SNF... Arizona has to pull a major upset with Ryan freaking Lindley at QB. I'll be like I was on happy pills if Cards somehow win that one. I don't think we're that lucky.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

I'm confused. As you've stated in other threads, the loss to the Bills already sealed the Packers' fate, and proved...as in scientific fact, like liquid water is wet kind of proof...that the Packers can't advance in the playoffs.

...so...why would you care about the outcome of SNF. Why would you be on happy pills? The Packers are on the undeniable path to a tragic inevitability anyway, right???

uffda udfa
Veteran Member Topic Starter

10 years ago

#98

Originally Posted by: musccy

Yup...IF they aren't the 1 seed.

Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."

musccy
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#99

Yup...IF they aren't the 1 seed.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

You never said that before. I thought it was utterly impossible to defeat Seattle whether played in gb, sea, or a neutral field. I thought Uncle Ted already put this team on the path to the #1 pick in the draft. I thought it was already determined this team has no hope except for the blind devotion rah rah green and gold Kool aid slurpers.

hardrocker950
Member

10 years ago

#100

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa

I really don't see how my post shows lack of comprehension. Just because you say one thing and somehow want it to mean something else does not make you bright. Aside from that point - maybe some of us are posting sarcastic responses because this topic is stupid anyway.[duh]

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (2h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (3h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (13h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (13h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (13h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (13h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (14h) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (17h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (17h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (17h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (20h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (20h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (20h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (20h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (20h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (20h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (20h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (20h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (21h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (21h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (21h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (22h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (22h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (22h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (22h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (22h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS