nerdmann
10 years ago
Worthy's trade reflects poorly on 2012 draft 

Even Demovsky's cribbing us now.

NOTE: All but two of these guys are still in the league. Which is to say, they're good enough to play, just not on OUR team. THANKS TED.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
steveishere
10 years ago
All this talk against fans who "only want to win the division" and I haven't seen a single person actually say they don't want to win the Superbowl every year and only care about winning the division. Where are these guys you are talking about? Everyone wants to win the Superbowl every year but it's probably not going to happen in any given year no matter who your GM is. If you only enjoy football if your team wins the Superbowl all the time then you aren't going to enjoy it no matter which team you follow. Look at NE they've had probably the best QB/GM combo in the last decade with 0 Superbowl wins. They only won Superbowls before Brady was even in his prime, since then he's become an even better QB and 0 Superbowl wins. NO also good GM and HC/great QB, 1 SB. Why?

Is this because all the GMs actually suck or because it's hard to win the Superbowl? I get 2011 and 2012 were embarrassing playoff losses, that shouldn't happen but remember 2012 our D was actually decent that year but Dom got straight outcoached in that game. I'm not saying you shouldn't want this team to win more Superbowls but you shouldn't get your panties all in a wad when it doesn't happen every year.
DarkaneRules
10 years ago
Exactly! Winning the super bowl every year would be fantastic, however

"If you only enjoy football if your team wins the Superbowl all the time then you aren't going to enjoy it no matter which team you follow."

Amen
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
Mucky Tundra
10 years ago

The Oakland Raiders for example had a big need at QB. They traded up to 23 right before the Packers and took ........ Fabian Washington. =d>

Originally Posted by: GermanGilbert 



I remember watching the draft live thinking what were the odds of a potential #1 pick and a QB to boot (leaving the Packers no choice as they'd always deflected not drafting a successor with the "no guy in the right spot" routine) falling all the way to the Packers but wondered if the Raiders would move back up. Then Chris Berman of all people wondered if the Raiders would make a move to get Rodgers. As if on cue, it was announced the Raiders had made a trade and I remember thinking they had Rodgers but nope! [aiee]
“Nah. I like having the island. It’s pretty cool...not too many visitors”
UserPostedImage
"I’ve got it." -Aaron Rodgers
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
10 years ago

All this talk against fans who "only want to win the division" and I haven't seen a single person actually say they don't want to win the Superbowl every year and only care about winning the division. Where are these guys you are talking about? Everyone wants to win the Superbowl every year but it's probably not going to happen in any given year no matter who your GM is. If you only enjoy football if your team wins the Superbowl all the time then you aren't going to enjoy it no matter which team you follow. Look at NE they've had probably the best QB/GM combo in the last decade with 0 Superbowl wins. They only won Superbowls before Brady was even in his prime, since then he's become an even better QB and 0 Superbowl wins. NO also good GM and HC/great QB, 1 SB. Why?

Is this because all the GMs actually suck or because it's hard to win the Superbowl? I get 2011 and 2012 were embarrassing playoff losses, that shouldn't happen but remember 2012 our D was actually decent that year but Dom got straight outcoached in that game. I'm not saying you shouldn't want this team to win more Superbowls but you shouldn't get your panties all in a wad when it doesn't happen every year.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 



It is not a matter of fans only enjoying the team IF the Packers win the SB. It is a matter of perspective. Do all fans feel that Uncle Teddy and Co and doing all they can to bring the best players possible to GB? I personally don't think he is. I think there is a certain amount of "let's field a team that will go 10-6 or so and take our chances". Would another GM in his place? Heck if I know.

Ted did a heck of a job getting GB out of cap hell but he seems to be so gun shy that he doesn't want to go anywhere near it ever again.

It is tough to win SBs no question about it. A draft and develop organization needs to be extra good in the draft part and in the develop part than most of the other teams. I don't see that with this organization.

A draft and develop team needs to get something from the 1st and second round players. They make up the backbone of the team. If the other draft picks develop into something special that is a bonus.

Teddy's draft picks:

2005 Rodgers and Collins. Both outstanding players but tell me Ted went to the draft expecting to be able to draft either Smith or Rodgers. That was pure luck on GB's part and stupidity on the rest of the league.

2006 Hawk, Colledge and Jennings A lot of people have blasted Hawk unfairly. He plays. He is not Nitschke and he does what he does well enough. Colledge was adequate and thought he was better than he actually was. Apparently so did AZ. Adequate but not outstanding. A lot of people were upset with small team undersized Jennings. I guess Teddy proved them wrong. Then again- was it Aaron that made the WR? Was it being a part of a pretty good stable of WR that helped him out? Maybe even so he was a decent pick.

2007 Harrell and Jackson Injuries or not this is a Bust and a disappointment.

2008 Nelson, Brohm and Lee Solid pick, and 2 busts. We will never know how Nelson will fair with another team and another QB. Well except if Aaron gets hurt again and his numbers plummet.

2009 Raji and Matthews Maybe Raji isn't a bust but he has certainly been disappointing. Then again CM3 has been disappointing in the number of times he has been injured. It is also disappointing the number of times he has been double and triple teamed. Where is his counter part?

2010 Buluga and Neal It is disappointing how often they have been injured too.

2011 Sherrod and Cobb it is disappointing when people say that a first round pick has one more year to prove himself and that he should not be considered a bust. I know it is not his fault his leg was broken. It is not as if he forgot to stretch and pulled a hammy. Bad things happen. It is disappointing Collins was injured. It is disappointing that many other players have been injured. It is disappointing that Sherrod falls into that category too.

2012 Perry, Worthy and Hayward Not really fair to classify any of them yet. Worthy may well go on to have a stellar career. For his sake I hope so. His life in GB was a disappointment none the less.

Not doing 2013 and 2014.

For a team that lives solely on draft and development there are too many busts 3 without Worthy 4 if you include him and disappointing careers 5 or 6 depending on where Worthy is placed. 9 out of 19 players. That is almost half of them did not meet the expectations of a #1 or #2 draft pick. (8 out of 16 without the class of 2013.)


Getting back to your comment you can win a division with success like this but you won't be very competitive in the playoffs against other team who do a better job or drafting or at least supplementing their draft with quality FAs.


UserPostedImage
voiceofreason
10 years ago
I absolutely want to win the superbowl. However I still feel the first goal is to win the division. In my opinion once your in the playoffs anything can happen. I think you have to have more luck than anything. More often than not, the "best" team in the league does not win the superbowl(in my opinion).
blank
StarrMax1
10 years ago

I absolutely want to win the superbowl. However I still feel the first goal is to win the division. In my opinion once your in the playoffs anything can happen. I think you have to have more luck than anything. More often than not, the "best" team in the league does not win the superbowl(in my opinion).

Originally Posted by: voiceofreason 



Be prepared to be told to "take off your green and gold glasses" and "that it is just unbelievable that you you can support Ted Thompsons draft and develope method".

NO team can get to The Super Bowl if they
1. Don't win their division, or
2. Make the playoffs as a wild card.

I to would like to know, who if anyone is available that could do a better job then Ted Thompson?

I'm not gonna hold my breath waiting for an answer to a direct question, "huffy" can only develope theories that he tries to pass off as facts.

steveishere
10 years ago



Getting back to your comment you can win a division with success like this but you won't be very competitive in the playoffs against other team who do a better job or drafting or at least supplementing their draft with quality FAs.

Originally Posted by: wpr 



The only teams we've lost to in the playoffs either ended up in the Superbowl or in the case of last year were probably the 2nd best team in the league. I'd like to know how we weren't competitive in the playoffs last year. I don't know, on paper I like this team more than I've liked any other before the season since Rodgers took over. That may not be the case in the end but I don't think there's a lack of talent here right now compared to other teams.
Zero2Cool
10 years ago
Alright, I have a theory!

The Packers know Jerel Worthy will FAIL his physical, thus, null the trade. This trade was orchestrated for the sole purpose of giving Worthy a ... excuse the pun ... a worthy kick in the ass to stop feeling entitled to a spot on the 53!

Now it all makes sense, you can go to sleep.
UserPostedImage
hardrocker950
10 years ago

Over Aggressiveness in free agency results in the redskins. I just do not get the Ted Thompson hate. If anybody on this forum can give me a better GM that we can obtain right now (with stats to back it up) give it to me please!

Originally Posted by: voiceofreason 



I mostly agree with you. I would like to see a bit more activity in FA - but surely not build the whole team that way. A handful of veteran experience can go a long way.
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (6h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (7h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (7h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (7h) : now 3
Zero2Cool (8h) : Who? What?
beast (17h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21h) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.