I don't see us in any better position than most other teams at WR depth. Boykin did OK as our #3 as a fill in, but it is unknown if he can do it for a year, and even more unknown if he could step up to fill as one of the top 2. Jones contract was IMO cheap enough for the increased depth and security having him

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 

lol no. Lacy wouldn't have to "carry" the offense just because our top WR are Jordy/Boykin or Cobb/Boykin. You think our passing game would just fall off the map haha, no chance. Even if we were down Jordy AND Cobb the other teams would still be setting up their defenses to stop Rodgers. The more WRs that went down the more we would lean on the running game certainly but as long as Rodgers is back there we wouldn't have to be carried by it.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 

Rodgers is good, even the best playing. But he is not GOD.

Originally Posted by: PackFanWithTwins 

He doesnt have to be god to still be a legit passing threat with jordy and boykin as his wr

Originally Posted by: steveishere 

Did you intentionally omit Cobb? If so, why?

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker 

He said if either jordy or cobb went down then lacy would have to carry the offense. Im saying its absurd to think we wouldnt still have a legit passing game with rodgers/nelson/boykin

Originally Posted by: steveishere 

I am pleased.

Good for both teams.

Originally Posted by: RaiderPride