Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
Zero2Cool
16 years ago

[img_r]http://i.packers.com/images/action/081008humphrey215.jpg[/img_r]It was the kind of play the Packers have always felt tight end Tory Humphrey is capable of making, and why Humphrey has been given every chance to get past his injury troubles over the past three years and get on the field.

Last Sunday, the Packers were trailing Atlanta 17-10 in the fourth quarter and cornerback Tramon Williams had just intercepted a Falcons pass in the end zone, shifting the momentum Green Bay's way. On first down from the 20-yard line, Humphrey and fellow tight end Donald Lee were lined up side by side and went out into pass routes at the snap.

While Lee cut across the field, Humphrey went into a dead sprint up the seam, and quarterback Aaron Rodgers hit him in stride for a 37-yard catch-and-run that jump-started the Packers' game-tying touchdown drive.

It was just one play, but it put everything on display that the Packers have been waiting for Humphrey to show in a game - the deceptive speed for a tight end, the good route-runner with strong hands, and the ability to stretch the middle of the field.

"His confidence catching the football has improved, and he's using his speed better in the pass game," tight ends coach Ben McAdoo said. "That's something that we've always talked about. We need to play fast with urgency, and when he caught the vertical route (Sunday), he did a nice job of snapping his head back, looking for the ball, but maintaining his speed and not slowing down."

Humphrey didn't slow down the rest of the game, catching three more passes in the fourth quarter to give him four catches for 67 yards, a career day for the third-year pro.

He had recorded a similarly impressive 35-yard catch-and-run on the first snap of the preseason game at Denver back on Aug. 22, but shortly thereafter Humphrey hurt his knee and had been playing at less than full strength during the first month of the regular season.

Having been sidelined for seven games in 2006 with a hamstring injury and all of last year with a broken ankle, and then battling that knee injury early this season, Humphrey can only hope last Sunday comes to define his breakout game, not just another flash of potential.

"It felt good, but it was kind of bittersweet," Humphrey said. "We lost the game, but I hope to build on that next game and get some wins."

First and foremost, for Humphrey to build on it, he needs to stay healthy. He says he's close to 100 percent now with the knee issue, while the ankle from last year is no longer a factor.

Second, he has to continue to be productive as a run-blocker to get on the field more. Humphrey had a holding penalty against the Falcons that helped kill a promising drive, but other than that one lapse in technique, McAdoo said he was physical at the line of scrimmage.

Third, he must continue to be reliable in pass protection, which is easier said than done in the Packers' scheme because the tight ends shift between blocking at the line of scrimmage and in the backfield, depending on the formation and play call.

But where Humphrey will show his skills the most is in the passing game, and the Packers employed more multiple tight end sets against the Falcons than they had much of the season, so that may have contributed to Humphrey seeing the ball more. On the big 37-yard play, Humphrey didn't think his speed caught the Falcons off-guard as much as the personnel and formation, and McAdoo gave him credit for running a great route, one the tight ends practice from Day 1 of the offseason program.

"It was just a go route," Humphrey said. "The safeties, I think they were worried about Donald (Lee) getting down the field, and they cut me loose I guess. I was wide open and made the play. It was a big momentum boost for the team."

Humphrey's day, combined with the four catches for 25 yards from Lee on Sunday, could provide some momentum for the entire offense as well. Coming into Week 5, Lee and Humphrey had combined for 12 receptions worth 91 yards this season. They posted a collective eight catches for 92 yards in just one game, and it's not just a coincidence that the Packers topped 400 yards of total offense last Sunday for the second time in 2008.

"The more guys are involved, the more the defense has to worry about," Humphrey said. "They might key on certain guys, or double-team a guy or one of the receivers, and leave one of the tight ends open, or leave the back open out in the flat. It opens up a lot of good things for us."

The game plans will dictate how that goes the rest of the way, and there's no way of guaranteeing what those game plans will feature. For instance, depending on matchups and schemes, there are always those games where Green Bay's tight ends are called on to help protect the passer more than catch passes.

But while Lee showed last season, with career bests of 48 catches, 575 yards and six touchdowns, that he's ready whenever his number is called, last Sunday proved Humphrey can be too.

"By coverages and the way things shake out sometimes, it may not seem or feel like we're a part of the pass game, but that's certainly not the case," McAdoo said of his tight end group. "(Sunday) we just had more opportunities based on the coverages called and the plays called at certain times.

"It's obviously a step in the right direction. I'm excited for Tory and excited for the future he has. We've been sticking with him because of his ability. He's a smart player, and he's a high-character guy. We just need to keep getting better every day."




I'm still on the boat of start Humphrey over Lee.
UserPostedImage
beast
16 years ago

I'm still on the boat of start Humphrey over Lee.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I was in that boat last year before he got injured. I kind of jumped ship this pre-season. I wanted Haynos even though I knew he wasn't one of the top 3. But I still wanted him because of his huge potential.

I think Humphry has more talent than Lee but Humphry is still more raw than Lee.

I really like Humphry but I'm still waiting for more.
UserPostedImage
Jakest3r
16 years ago
I'd love to start Humphrey over Lee, and the main reason is because Lee isn't producing like last season. The only thing that is discerning to me is the fact that we gave Lee an extension for a reasonable amount of money and all of a sudden he has just completely disappeared. I haven't paid enough attention to see whats causing him to not gain separation, but he has just become completely irrelevant in the Packers offense.
blank
evad04
16 years ago
So much of what we think about players oscillates from week to week, based on performance. I think there are too many immediate evaluations made. I think Donald Lee is a good tight-end and will step up. At times we haven't had a very productive offense. At the moments it was doing well, it was largely do to explosive plays in the passing game. Explosive plays in the passing game usually feature explosive wide receivers. We have one of those. His name is Gregorious.

I like Humphrey. I hope he continues to make plays. But there's no controversy -- Lee is our starter.
William Henderson didn't have to run people over. His preferred method was levitation.
"I'm a reasonable man, get off my case."
tromadz
16 years ago
I don't care who starts as long they produce.

We need to use our tight ends in the pass game while defenses crap themselves over the Driver\Jennings threat.
gakko
16 years ago
Rodgers hasn't targeted Lee as much as Favre did last season. Also we have a lot of targets for our QB, so it may be difficult to get that kind of production as Rodgers shifts around a lot regarding who's his target.
blank
bakler5
16 years ago
Lee, or any tight end for that matter, isn't producing because we keep them in to help our piss poor line block. Lee is still the best tight end on this team, maybe not the most potential, but by far the best right now. As far as potential goes i believe Finley has the most.
God didn't create Aaron Rodgers, Aaron Rodgers created God.
Since69
16 years ago

Lee, or any tight end for that matter, isn't producing because we keep them in to help our piss poor line block.

"bakler5" wrote:



werd. +1
UserPostedImage
tromadz
16 years ago

Lee, or any tight end for that matter, isn't producing because we keep them in to help our piss poor line block.

"Since69" wrote:



werd. +1

"bakler5" wrote:



Not watching much of the games, are ya guys?

Because I really wish that was the case, and I'd like to see a lot of that until the Oline gets their heads out of their asses.
bakler5
16 years ago

Lee, or any tight end for that matter, isn't producing because we keep them in to help our piss poor line block.

"tromadz" wrote:



werd. +1

"Since69" wrote:



Not watching much of the games, are ya guys?

Because I really wish that was the case, and I'd like to see a lot of that until the Oline gets their heads out of their asses.

"bakler5" wrote:



Actually I have seen every snap of every game. If i remember correctly from the live chat last week you were the one struggling to be able to watch the game. :thumbleft:
God didn't create Aaron Rodgers, Aaron Rodgers created God.
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : I guess 3 games. Whatever
Zero2Cool (1h) : Bleh, that only impacts two games.
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers are gonna get 3rd place division schedule next year.
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Kanata, seek help! lol
beast (4h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status
Zero2Cool (4h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha
TheKanataThrilla (4h) : That was terrible.
TheKanataThrilla (4h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.
beast (5h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent
beast (5h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime
beast (5h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing
Zero2Cool (6h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is
Zero2Cool (6h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true
beast (6h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management
wpr (9h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (17h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (23h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (23h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (26-Dec) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

3h / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13h / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.