It would be pretty funny to see them all called back to replay the last 10 seconds of the game.

Originally Posted by: stevegb 

why? GB won it already. just because the refs blew the call doesn't mean Seattle gets a do over like a 5th grader.

Originally Posted by: wpr 

I'm officially on football-watching strike until the ref strike is over. This is fucking ridiculous.

Originally Posted by: TwinkieGorilla 

We'll I'd prefer replay 1 play than have the L.

Originally Posted by: stevegb 

Instead of flying 4 hours each way, an hour to get suited up and then stretch, the possibility of injury, the time that Seattle would have to prepare for the one play, I think Mike McCarthy would take the loss.

Originally Posted by: wpr 

Want change.. this is how you control change. IMO, should have been done prior to the player lockout and new CBA.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 

With the exception of Packers games I'm done with NFL football even after the owners lockout is broken (if it ever is).
The owners by going down this road has made their product unwatchable.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan 

According to the NFL press release, possession IS reviewable if it is in the end zone, but not if it is in the rest of the field of play.

And according to same, the reason for no reversal was "a lack of indisputable evidence." Let's be honest, how many times have we seen the regular refs weasel out of something using that same phrase.

I think the Packers got hosed (though I'm more bothered by the Walden roughing and the Shields/Rice interference calls than the TD/interception/no-interference call). But I just think people are acting as if the regular refs never make such egregious mistakes. Which is silly. Heck, I can virtually guarantee that the Triplett or Hochuli crews are going to have major screw-ups in any Packer game they do.

And lets not forget that the reason Seattle was in position to make that last play is how many times the Packers rushed just three players on that last possession.

Originally Posted by: Wade