Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
12 years ago
Here is why.. the NFLPA has agreed to the IR exception and the later deadline.

This is good news for both Bishop and the team.. if he can make a speedy recovery.. he has a hope of playing again this season and possibly helping the team later in the year.

Good news.


http://www.packershome.com/forum.aspx?g=posts&m=215846#post215846 
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
earthquake
12 years ago

Here is why.. the NFLPA has agreed to the IR exception and the later deadline.

This is good news for both Bishop and the team.. if he can make a speedy recovery.. he has a hope of playing again this season and possibly helping the team later in the year.

Good news.


http://www.packershome.com/forum.aspx?g=posts&m=215846#post215846 

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



Awesome! I was really hoping this would happen and was surprised to hear about the lack of progress on it, it really seemed like a win-win for everyone.


blank
gbguy20
12 years ago
What is hilarious is that just a week ago they rejected both rule changes. Glad the NFLPA is worried about this and not the lack of capable officials.

edit: Why the hell did I just bring negativity into this thread? ignore that. I am excited for the possibility of Bishop's return.
BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
12 years ago
I seem to remember somewhere that the exception only applies to people on the original list of 53 before going on IR. And since Bishop went on IR before the cutdown to 53, he's still done for the year.

Don't remember where I read that, though, so I might be misremembering.
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Zero2Cool
12 years ago

I seem to remember somewhere that the exception only applies to people on the original list of 53 before going on IR. And since Bishop went on IR before the cutdown to 53, he's still done for the year.

Don't remember where I read that, though, so I might be misremembering.

Originally Posted by: Wade 



There is a chance some will be grandfathered in since this rule change took place after first roster cuts.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
12 years ago

I seem to remember somewhere that the exception only applies to people on the original list of 53 before going on IR. And since Bishop went on IR before the cutdown to 53, he's still done for the year.

Don't remember where I read that, though, so I might be misremembering.

Originally Posted by: Wade 



I believe that to be correct, maybe I am will be wrong again. However, I would think the Packers would be allowed to re-designate him with this rule being instituted within the season as it was.

We shall see.. but good point.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
doddpower
12 years ago
As mentioned, Bishop is probably best left on the IR all season. Sounds like a nasty injury. I'm almost wondering if this designation wouldn't be better for someone such as House.
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
12 years ago
My only point, is this partial season IR policy at least gives players like this options.

But I agree.. it might not be used on Bishop.. but at least there is a chance.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
12 years ago
Here is the answer Wade.. this had to be included IMO since they instituted the rule within the calendar year.

So yes.. they have to be on the final roster, and must be on the IR for at least 8 weeks.

House may be a better candidate for this.. that or hold it in their pocket for later in the season for an injury.

The injured reserve rule allows one player per team  to be activated from IR after a “major injury.” The player must miss at least six weeks of practice. He may be placed on the active list at least eight weeks after placement on injured reserve.

Unlike the PUP list, then, the window for returning to practice or returning to action doesn’t close. Once it’s open, it stays open.

Patriots owner Robert Kraft has said that, if such a provision had been in place four years ago, the team possibly would have used the designation for quarterback Tom Brady, who tore an ACL in Week One.

Here’s where it gets complicated. Because teams already have cut to 75, a special procedure applies for 2012. As to teams that already have placed players on IR, the player for whom the short-term IR procedure will be used must be placed back on the active roster by 9:00 p.m. ET, August 31. He’ll then count as one of the final 53.

Then, after 4:00 p.m. ET on Tuesday, September 4, each team can place one player on the modified IR list.

This means that teams hoping to use the new IR rule for a player already on injured reserve will have to displace another player for nearly four days, using a roster spot for the injured player and then creating a roster spot next Tuesday, when that player goes back to IR.


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
beast
12 years ago

each team can place one player on the modified IR list.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z's article 




That line made me wonder... do you have to pick which player as soon as you put them on IR?

Or can you put a guy on IR and then wait to see if they get healthy or not before moving them over to the modified IR?


Because say they put Bishop will come back... but then they realize he's not going to be healthy enough to return, and another player (say Starks since he's injured right now) get put on the IR but is getting healthy... can they pick Starks after he's been on the IR for 8 weeks?


Or do they have to pick the player as soon as they get put on the IR?
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (6h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (11h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (19h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (19h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (19h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (19h) : now 3
Zero2Cool (20h) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
11h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

13h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.