Tom Fraidy ?? · PACKERSHOME

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

There’s not a doubt in my mind that [the Jets] rattled [Brady.] He started seeing things that weren’t even there. He’s human. He literally ducked down one time and there was no one there. Nobody was close to him. He thought he saw something and it wasn’t there. He literally ducked. We were literally like, ‘Did you see that? Is that really Tom Brady?'

Source wrote:

I posted this with Rourke in mind. He's been saying something similar about Tom Brady for awhile now. Yes, I know, rattle ANY QB and they'll lower their game. I just thought he and some others might get a chuckle out of this.

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

12 years ago

I remember that game. It was fun to watch. It amazes me that more teams aren't willing to try to put him on the ground and get in his head. Actually, after the Ravens game in the playoffs, the radio commentators were saying much the same thing -- that the Ravens had gotten in Brady's head and he was ducking even when no one was coming. Any team that can affect Brady that way has an excellent chance of winning, and if there's one team who can probably make it happen, it's the Giants.

I will be rooting for the Giants in this Super Bowl, although it will be with a bitter taste in my mouth.

Formo
Veteran Member

12 years ago

I will be rooting for the Giants in this Super Bowl, although it will be with a bitter taste in my mouth.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

I never saw that game.. Wish I had, though. But I agree with your sentiments. Not a fan of either team, but I work with a Pats fan and sometimes his Bostonian shows and annoys me. So I'll be very slightly pulling for the G-men.

Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

I think the goal of any front line is to rattle the QB and I think a good deal of QB's are easily effected by that. I loved getting knocked around, it made me play more focused and determined. But I was also shorter than most of whom I was playing with. I also had a massive chip on my shoulder, to prove that I could play to their level and above.

I still say, if you let any QB have ~3 or more to throw the ball, he's going to torch your ass. Either by deep balls, or dinking and dunking.

Slam a QB around, even if he's getting rid of the ball ... it WILL stay in his head, either it'll piss him off and motivate him, or it'll make me worry about his own shadow. I think Tom Brady is probably the latter where as someone like Big Ben is the former.

dhazer
Veteran Member

12 years ago

I agree Zero either a QB will use it for motivation or make him worry, but aren't alot of the top QB's in the later part. Are own Rodgers is like that, you could see games he was worried about his line holding up and he would rush throws or take off when he didn't have to. Your bigger built qb's I think is the ones that get motivated because they can take the hits.

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

I think it starts with hitting him, even when you don’t actually get sacks, just keeping people around him so he can’t step up. I think he gets a little frustrated when he has to go to his second or third receivers. You can kind of confuse him sometimes with our coverage. I think there are a lot of things that can get him rattled, but it just seems like not too many people are able to do that.

We had a lot of hits on him. Even when we didn’t hit him, he didn’t have the time to sit back there and allow some of the routes to develop. We know that as a D-line, we put a lot of pressure on ourselves to make sure that we are in his face. He is a hell of a quarterback, and he is going to do a lot of things to throw us off our rhythm.

Justin Tuck wrote:

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

You [have] to catch the ball when you’re supposed to catch the ball. My husband cannot fucking throw the ball and catch the ball at the same time. I can’t believe they dropped the ball so many times.

Gisele Bundchen wrote:

Remind you of anyone?

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

12 years ago

Show Spoiler

What I can't fucking believe is how plain Gisele Bundchen looks in that shot. That woman is a supermodel? Almost every one of us on this site knows plenty of women better looking than that. If she can be a supermodel, almost any woman who isn't completely hideous could be.

Wade
Veteran Member

12 years ago

Show Spoiler

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel

Because being a supermodel isn't about being hot. Being a supermodel is about having some vaguely defined "it" when being shot through a camera lens.

Look closeup at any supermodel like that shot does, especially when they're not in "public be-a-supermodel" mode, and you'll find a lot of plainness in every last one of them.

But push the "be a supermodel now" button before you click the camera, and the "it" will obscure the plainess.

IMO.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)

macbob
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#10

Remind you of anyone?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Here's a link with a video of her making the comment. It's not the best quality, but the quote is toward the end.

http://thebiglead.com/index.php/2012/02/06/gisele-rips-patriots-receivers-for-dropped-passes-after-super-bowl-loss-video/

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (5h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (11h) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (16h) : Merry Christmas!

beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS