yooperfan
13 years ago
Since I personally believe that some of the NFL's games are "scripted", ( the Super Bowl between Seattle and Pittsburgh, the Patriots loss to end their perfect season just to name two) I think this was a "scripted" loss. ( the phantom calls against Jordy, the inexclipable "non-challenge" by McCarthy) that he never had to answer for, that was the blueprint for this game.

Oh, by the way, the Packers aren't supposed to beat the Bears in another "scripted" game, Bears win this one. Seattle loses to the 49 er's.
Exciting NFL season, right!
dyeah_gb
13 years ago

Since I personally believe that some of the NFL's games are "scripted", ( the Super Bowl between Seattle and Pittsburgh, the Patriots loss to end their perfect season just to name two) I think this was a "scripted" loss. ( the phantom calls against Jordy, the inexclipable "non-challenge" by McCarthy) that he never had to answer for, that was the blueprint for this game.

Oh, by the way, the Packers aren't supposed to beat the Bears in another "scripted" game, Bears win this one. Seattle loses to the 49 er's.
Exciting NFL season, right!

Originally Posted by: yooperfan 



Does the script have the Packers winning the Super Bowl this year? I might be on board if that is the case. :)

The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman
Rios39
13 years ago

maybe the yards per carry is as good as it is because they don't run it often?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Yes that's likely the case. But you can't use a running game as a con when the yards per carry at worst are solid to good. That's going against the evidence.

I do however think our run block is suspect at best. Some games they look good, some games they look like trash.
blank
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

Yes that's likely the case. But you can't use a running game as a con when the yards per carry at worst are solid to good. That's going against the evidence.

I do however think our run block is suspect at best. Some games they look good, some games they look like trash.

Originally Posted by: Rios39 


Let's be clear here, I never said the running game was a con. I just threw out that maybe the yards per carry is as good as it is because the Packers don't run often. 🙂
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago

they had a lot of drops. Rodgers was holding onto the ball too long and they couldn't get Grant enough carries. I love how people always disregard our gun game but our YPC a lot of times is actually good, we just don't go to it often.

Originally Posted by: Rios39 



A delayed response here. I'm glad you raised the question of how long Rodgers might have been holding on to the ball. I remember more than once against KC where I thought he was doing so.

I didn't think this at the time, but I wonder if this is because the receivers aren't getting open. It would also explain why he sent so many balls to Mr Drops -- no one else was getting open quick enough. Just a thought.

I also don't understand why they didn't run Grant a few more times. He was running well.

Wouldn't it be cool if they ran the ball 40 times against Chicago. [duh]
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago

Yes that's likely the case. But you can't use a running game as a con when the yards per carry at worst are solid to good. That's going against the evidence.

I do however think our run block is suspect at best. Some games they look good, some games they look like trash.

Originally Posted by: Rios39 



Sort of like the pass blocking?

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
zombieslayer
13 years ago

Sort of like the pass blocking?

Originally Posted by: Wade 



Yup. And for the tenth time, we better keep drafting at least 2 OL every year. I was pissed off at the beginning of the year when we went with the additional TE and not enough OL. I really didn't want to be right. That wasn't something I wanted to be right about.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
nerdmann
13 years ago

Yup. And for the tenth time, we better keep drafting at least 2 OL every year. I was pissed off at the beginning of the year when we went with the additional TE and not enough OL. I really didn't want to be right. That wasn't something I wanted to be right about.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 


I think the way Ted looks at it is, we had the guys at the TE position, but not at the OL position, who why keep an extra OL?
The Oline will be huge in this game, but I think they'll help them out. If Finley has 2 or fewer drops, we win this game. Pretty solid.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
zombieslayer
13 years ago

I think the way Ted looks at it is, we had the guys at the TE position, but not at the OL position, who why keep an extra OL?
The Oline will be huge in this game, but I think they'll help them out. If Finley has 2 or fewer drops, we win this game. Pretty solid.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Yeah, but I'm not looking at this game. I'm looking at the playoffs. I'd much rather go into the Playoffs short a TE than short an OL.

Everyone makes mistakes. Even 🇹🇹.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
nerdmann
13 years ago

Yeah, but I'm not looking at this game. I'm looking at the playoffs. I'd much rather go into the Playoffs short a TE than short an OL.

Everyone makes mistakes. Even 🇹🇹.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 


Our OL is getting healthier. Clifton and Bulaga will be back for the playoffs. We just need to keep Arodge healthy between now and then. Of secondary importance, we need to lock up home field advantage.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Fan Shout
beast (49m) : Yeah, but also some of the wording suggestions Jax only pranked called the QB, not the others... and if he had an open spreadsheet & 3 calls
beast (51m) : Thank goodness he's not leaving the Turtle in the Red Tide
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Cowboys 1st round pick Tyler Booker will indeed be bringing his pet turtle to Dallas with him
Mucky Tundra (1h) : that contained all prospects info and contact
Mucky Tundra (1h) : beast, according the Falcons statement Jax came across it on an ipad. If I had to guess, probably an open spread sheet or something
Zero2Cool (1h) : Simmons put up an emoji with cheese.
beast (1h) : Not sure anyone is interested in Isaiah Simmons... Collin Oliver might of taken his potential slot
beast (2h) : I'm going with Jax Ulbrich is not telling the whole truth... he accidentally came across it? Why would a defensive coordinator have a QB #?
Zero2Cool (2h) : He's not that great, but final piece of the script.\
Zero2Cool (2h) : If we add Isaiah Simmons, book your Super Bowl tickets
Mucky Tundra (3h) : Colts 1st round TE Tyler Warren also got prank called, was that Jax Ulbrich as well?
Zero2Cool (3h) : Jax Ulbrich, Jeff Ulbrich’s son, released an apology for his role in the Shedeur Sanders prank call.
Martha Careful (3h) : apparently he did not participate in practice or play on the east west shrine game nor the NFL combine. The kid was a mediocre spoiled brat
Mucky Tundra (3h) : Yeah that one that was a super wounded duck that Sanders supporters are highlighting to prove a point
Zero2Cool (3h) : Shough is the guy who missed guys at combine isn't he?
beast (4h) : It's not official until I'm dead! I have a chance still! (Not really)
Mucky Tundra (13h) : I could feel my body decomposing in real time when I read that
Mucky Tundra (13h) : @MIKEYSAINRISTIL Tyler Shough will officially be the last person drafted to the NFL born in the 1900’s
Mucky Tundra (23h) : saw the tweet, he meant the city
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Was that for the team or the city?
Zero2Cool (23h) : Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter · 3m Draft grade is in: Green Bay gets an A. The people, the city, the venue were all superb. NFL Draft’s next
Zero2Cool (23h) : Matt LaFleur says Jaire Alexander is participating in #Packers offseason program, which has been conducted virtually during this first week
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : ✅ ...
buckeyepackfan (26-Apr) : Check
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : Matthew Golden cahanged 81 to 22??
TheKanataThrilla (26-Apr) : Sam Howell to Vikings...guess no Aaron
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : 1 round 7 min, with one extra minute if there is a trade. 2nd round 4 minutes, 3rd -3, 2 thereafter IMO
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Agree
dfosterf (26-Apr) : Great idea imo
dfosterf (26-Apr) : 1st round to 7 minutes with one extension
dfosterf (26-Apr) : NFL comissioner wants to shorten the 2st
Mucky Tundra (26-Apr) : @jalenreagors They’re discussing if Sheduer can go back to college on NFL Network LMFAOOOOO
beast (26-Apr) : Great point Martha
beast (26-Apr) : Buddy Ryan used to say if a candy bar goes missing, there are two to blame, Rex and Rob 🤪 jk 😁
Martha Careful (26-Apr) : Bum Phillips used to say there are two ways to get better. Get better players or get players to play better. We have a new DL coach
Zero2Cool (26-Apr) : Yes. Look at the losses last year. They can win.
beast (26-Apr) : Can Packers win with their current DL?
bboystyle (26-Apr) : waiting for a pass rusher.
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 5 minutes between picks in the 3rd
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 3rd. Hate this phone
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 4rd
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 5 minutes in the 4
dfosterf (25-Apr) : 7 minutes between picks in the 2nd round
Martha Careful (25-Apr) : Sorry to bitch, but the headline writers in that section absolutely mislead, or don't know how to read. It is maddening
Martha Careful (25-Apr) : No thanks. Not a dependable guy to be in the right place and run the right route. Dumb as a box of rocks.
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : Losing 2nd round pick for a one year rental, not ideal. Especially a headcase.
TheKanataThrilla (25-Apr) : Pickens for Jaire may be interesting. Definitely not sure we want Pickens long term.
dfosterf (25-Apr) : No.Absolutely not
Zero2Cool (25-Apr) : NO NO NO NO NO NO!!1 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
dhazer (25-Apr) : scenario: Our main prospects are off the board when our pick comes around, do we just throw a 2nd round pick at Pittsburgh for Pickens
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
46m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1h / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Around The NFL / bboystyle

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3h / Packers Draft Threads / Mucky Tundra

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

21h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

21h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

21h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

21h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

21h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

21h / Packers Draft Threads / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.