Zero.. sorry if you took offense as that was not the intention.. but how else does one do research upon such a topic?
From people inside the Packers organization? .. do we believe that they would be unbiased in their viewpoint or have all the details.
Unless someone knows one of the 4 main players in this past mess, then where else would you gather your information?
IMO, each and every person that pens any piece does it with some personal bias attached.. directly upon the story or indirectly with which source they utilize.. my point is the only way to do research upon this is to utilize someones view of the fact they have gathered. There was no film to study, no taping of the calls, no score being kept someplace on the fiasco.
My only point of saying anything is that we are so quick to slam a source that may have intimate knowledge of the story behind the press.. I would love to know exactly how it played out, but quite honestly, that story probably will never be told with an unbiased voice. IMO of course.
It was just another viewpoint based on their conversations with the three individuals and treated as such... but as most things in the past, there will always be some shading to the story with the reality buried to never be found.
It is of the past, sorry I ruffled a feather.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"