Greg C.
13 years ago
Ryan Grant: Looked pretty good for the most part. Quick and decisive. Had one gaffe, however, when he appeared to have a lot of room to run on a draw play but cut the wrong way and got swallowed up by a D-lineman after only a two-yard gain.

Alex Green: Looked great on that 25-yard catch and run on a screen pass and also looked good punching it into the end zone two plays later. The rest of the game he got no blocking and did nothing, ending up with eight yards on six carries. I read that he was responsible for a sack after missing a block. If he can clean that up he should be the third down back.

Dmitri Nance: He really looked good, and this is the first time I've thought that. Before this game, I thought his chances of making the roster were nil, barring an injury to one of the other RBs. I still think he's a longshot, but he looked quick and had some nice runs.

Brandon Saine: Honestly, I still can't get a fix on this guy. I'll have to watch the game again, with fewer distractions this time. Maybe someone else has an opinion.

(James Starks did not play because of a minor injury.)
blank
JHeids
13 years ago
Looks to me like Green has a lot of upside. Grant is Grant and will get his 1200 yards if healthy. Personally I think Starks is better but Grant will play more unless starks gets hot. And Mike McCarthy may do that....go with the hot hand. Nice problem to have actually considering the problems at Rb for the last several seasons.
djcubez
13 years ago
I heard Kuhn is a possibility for the third-down back spot. It'd give Green some time to learn.
Greg C.
13 years ago

I heard Kuhn is a possibility for the third-down back spot. It'd give Green some time to learn.

Originally Posted by: djcubez 



Yeah, I've heard Kuhn mentioned, but that would be very disappointing. A third down back should be someone who has some speed and some moves so he can gain a lot of yardage in the open field. Kuhn's a good player, but I don't think he fits the role of third down back very well. And if Brandon Jackson could do it as a rookie in 2007, so can Alex Green. He's perfectly suited for the job as long as he can learn how to block decently.
blank
zombieslayer
13 years ago

I heard Kuhn is a possibility for the third-down back spot. It'd give Green some time to learn.

Originally Posted by: djcubez 



I don't think he's quick enough. As big as William Henderson was, he was surprisingly quick and could jump over would be tacklers.

I'd prefer if we had a quicker 3rd down back. Kuhn's decent for a short yardage back, but not a 3rd down back. Hoping Green can play the latter role (assuming Green can block).
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
PackerTraxx
13 years ago
I think Green will be really good. I liked him from the first videos I saw after the draft. He has very good balance feet and quickness, his spin move is fun to watch. Not many men his size can do that. It was only one pass but he seemed to catch it effortlessly and play went very smoothly. He just needs some time and reps, another rookie that the lockout hurt with no OTAs. Rook's improvement this year should be noticeable nearly weekly if they are playing at all.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
Greg C.
13 years ago
After watching the game a second time, I think the bad run by Grant on that draw play was probably not his fault. It looked like Scott Wells was not able to get a good block on Darnell Dockett, who had dropped back off the line of scrimmage. If Grant had cut left instead or right, he would've run into another defender, and Dockett still would've factored into the play because Wells was not able to engage him. It was a very good play by a very good defensive lineman.

Grant had a couple of very good runs in this game and seems to be playing as well as ever.
blank
Dulak
13 years ago
what we learned from week 2 ...
well first off this is a preseason game where Mike McCarthy is trying to sus-out whom is going to stay; whom is going to start and whom is going to get the boot.

grant will obviously stay - not sure if he will be the starter or not ... might just employ a 2 back solution with him and starks ...

I liked how green ran ... nice running - be interesting to see how he does in the next 2 games ...
ya sure nance did ok with a fumble recovery and that run to the outside but if you guys remember last year he pretty much sucked badly. And we have to get down to 53 - whom you going to drop then?
How many backs do we want?

I havnt been following as closely as last year - but is hall a goner? or is he still a option? ...
I hope we keep kuhn, quinn and then we have grant, starks and green? that would be 5 right there.

and heaven forbid we see what we have at the TE position ...


Greg C.
13 years ago
I don't see Nance staying either, unless they decide to keep four RBs, which seems unlikely. I agree that the most likely scenario for the backfield is Grant, Starks, Green, Kuhn, and Quinn Johnson. Some say Johnson could get cut in favor of an extra TE, but I don't think it's that easy to plug in a TE at FB.

Korey Hall plays for the Saints now.
blank
dhpackr
13 years ago
I'm not sure you can evaluate the running attack in a game that was pass, pass, then pass some more.
So if you meet me Have some courtesy, Have some sympathy, and some taste
Use all your well-learned politesse, Or I'll lay your soul to waste
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (21h) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
27m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

23h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.