If the Vikings don't get Sweet Sidney signed, they are so f__ked that it is laughable. I read on ESPN this morning that Seattle is driving up the price for him too. They probably still remember the Hutchinson theft. Reap it Formo.

McNabb is as soft as Liberace at the Playboy Mansion.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 

I wouldn't have minded having T-Jack as our backup if something came along for Flynn.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf 

Agreed.. I think Bevell/Chilly blundered his development overall... Tjack to me has potential.. not top shelf but serviceable potential.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 

Pack, if you're talking about the Fleaflicker bet, I do believe that would be me, as I finished above both you and Foster. I have no idea what to "request," but whatever you would have liked to receive in such a scenario would be fine by me I'm sure. ;-)

Originally Posted by: doddpower 

The only thing that worries me is that it seems like McNabb always played very well against us.... looking back I only see a few games played, much less played well against us, but in '04 he racked up 464yds, 5 tds, and 147.8 rating. This was in '04 when we finished 10-6, won the division, and unfortunately lost to the Vikings in the WC game. That game put a pretty sour taste in my mouth for any time we played him since then and it makes me a little nervous for this season. We'll see, I guess.

Originally Posted by: peteralan71 

Dude... that was 7 years ago. I'm not a stats guy but I think we've pretty much owned McNabb since then.

McNabb to the Vikings is good news... for every else in the NFC North. Let him throw at the Viking receivers' feet for a year while he stunts Ponder's growth.

Originally Posted by: Since69 

I wouldn't have minded having T-Jack as our backup if something came along for Flynn.

Originally Posted by: dfosterf