RashaanSalaami
14 years ago
Week 1 
Week 2 
Week 3 
Week 4 + Season 
Week 5 
Week 6 
Week 7 
Week 8 + Season 
Week 9 
Week 11 
Week 12 
Week 13 
Week 14 + Season 
Week 15 
Week 16 
Week 17 
Wild Card 
Divisional 
Championship 

Super Bowl (VS Pittsburgh Steelers):

UserPostedImage
My Coverage Player of the Week:
Week 1: Tramon Williams
Week 2: Sam Shields
Week 3: Nick Collins
Week 4: Charles Woodson
Week 5: Tramon Williams
Week 6: Nick Collins
Week 7: Nick Collins
Week 8: Charles Woodson
Week 9: Charles Woodson/Tramon Williams
Week 11: Tramon Williams
Week 12: Charlie Peprah
Week 13: Tramon Williams
Week 14: Tramon Williams
Week 15: Charles Woodson
Week 16: AJ Hawk
Week 17: Defense
Wild Card: Tramon Williams
Divisional: Tramon Williams
Championship: Sam Shields
Super Bowl: Nick Collins/Tramon Williams

The final game of the season is in the books and even though we won it all, a part of me is sad to see such an incredible year come to an end. I'm gonna keep this fairly short.

First off, I can't express how lucky we are to make it through the entire season with our secondary mostly in tact. When Woodson and Shields when out, we could all see the difference it made, but if you haven't seen the exact numbers, here they are:
With Woodson: 52.9%, 31.9 QB Rating
Without Woodson: 69.6%, 118.0 QB Rating
I'm sure over time we would have adjusted, but no chance we make the Super Bowl playing multiple games down the stretch without Woodson (and Shields).

As you can see, this game was no different from what we basically already knew about this team and that starts with Tramon Williams. BOSS! It doesn't make much sense to me. You target Mike Wallace 16 times when the majority of the time he's matched up against Tramon, but Ward only 9? This perplexed me even more in the 2nd half, particularly toward the end of the game. I don't understand why teams feel they're going to beat Tramon with anything other than a proven veteran that's more than a one-trick pony, even if that one trick is really good. I'm sure I wasn't the only one praying that entire 2nd half that every ball out of Big Ben's hand would find its way to man Tramon was covering. The pass break-up was really one of my favorite plays of the game. His change of direction is elite and has the ball skills to match. Game-winner was pretty sweet too.

He shares the coverage player of the week with Collins. His pick was crucial and quite frankly, he made a couple extremely impressive plays flying in to make great tackles. That poor edge contain on 3rd and 1 to Isaac Redman was a drawback and could have kept some distance and prevented a near heart attack, but that's not in coverage.

Shields didn't have his best game and allowed 78 yards, while missing most of the 2nd half. It was really only 2 poor plays that accounted for most of it though. He was caught playing too aggressively and overplaying his cards.

Jarrett Bush showed us more of the same. Decent coverage ability, poor ball skills, lots of athleticism. Still, it's hard to hate on him when he came up with a huge pick. Go back and re-watch that interception though and look at the 2 players streaking WIDE OPEN behind him in the middle of the field. If Roethlisberger doesn't go away from those progressions so quickly, it's a HUGE play waiting to happen and odds are that he probably doesn't make it back on the roster next year.

Pat Lee played what? About 15, 20 snaps? No targets? Man must have been doing something right. Will he actually become a player for us?

Our linebackers did a nice job for the most part. They did a nice job reading the quick screens to the wideouts and getting out there quickly. We won this game defensively in 3 areas. 1) Turnovers 2) Ability to limit the quick screens 3) Ability to contain the deep ball

One final point of note, I think the Steelers and Cardinals games last year are going to prove to be positive outcomes for us in the future. We recognized stacked sets as a true weakness last season and had absolutely no problem defending against them this season. In fact, I'd even go as far as to say it was a strength of ours. Some of it can be attributed to our superior depth, but I don't doubt it's something our defense worked on in the summer.

So much for keeping it short. Season in review will be posted tomorrow hopefully. [url=Pro_News/aid=164.html]full article[/url].
blank
Greg C.
14 years ago
The QB rating with and without Woodson is about what I expected, and you might as well say without Woodson and Shields. Although Shields returned in the fourth quarter, I think it's likely that his injury had something to do with getting burned by Wallace for that TD. It's a lot harder to get a jam on a receiver when you're playing with a shoulder injury, and Shields completely failed to do so--the first time I've seen him look like that all season. I don't think it was a coincidence. Also, I read that Shields was not on the field for Pittsburgh's final drive, which is proof of how significantly he was injured.

You make a good point about the Packers being lucky not to have any significant injuries in the secondary during the course of the season. That seems to be the one position group, second only to QB, where injuries will just kill you. We saw that last year. I guess it was fitting, then, that in the final game of the season the Packers lost two of their top three CBs and were able to weather the storm against one of the best QBs in the league.

Like you, I was glad that they kept throwing at Tramon. I'm not sure which play you are referring to when you mention the "pass break-up." I thought you were talking about the fourth and five play, but then you mention the "game-winner," which is definitely the fourth and five play. It was a textbook play, which we've seen from him all year. Wallace complained afterwards that Tramon made contact before the ball arrived, but it didn't look like it to me.

What a nightmare, having to watch the Packers protect a narrow lead in the second half of the Super Bowl with Jarrett Bush running around out there. True to form, his best plays were made near the line of scrimmage (the interception and the QB hit on the blitz). Get him ten yards or more downfield and he is lost, although I can't fault him too much for getting burned by Ward on that TD. He was in one-on-one coverage, protecting half of the end zone, and Ward had time to make about three moves.

I like what you wrote about the Steelers and Cardinals games last year being important to this year's success. There's a nice symmetry to that. It's sort of like what Raider Pride wrote a few weeks ago about how the loss to the Giants in the NFC championship game led to the QB change that made this year's success possible. The heartbreaking losses don't seem so bad when lessons are learned and the team is ultimately successful.
blank
zombieslayer
14 years ago
Awesome seeing Bush getting an INT because I've been defending Bush this season. Wonderful ST player, and the only reason he's defending is because of injuries. So I say blame the injury bug, not Bush.

Two injuries to CBs in one game and we still win. Great job Packers. I'd probably give it to Collins who has a slight edge over Williams with that INT. INTs make a huge difference. They end drives and set things up for the O.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Greg C.
14 years ago

Awesome seeing Bush getting an INT because I've been defending Bush this season. Wonderful ST player, and the only reason he's defending is because of injuries. So I say blame the injury bug, not Bush.

Two injuries to CBs in one game and we still win. Great job Packers. I'd probably give it to Collins who has a slight edge over Williams with that INT. INTs make a huge difference. They end drives and set things up for the O.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



INTs make even more of a difference when they are returned for touchdowns. I would give Collins the edge as well. He made some nice tackles, and in coverage he made up for getting fooled a couple times against the Bears.
blank
TengoJuego
14 years ago
I couldn't believe how may times they ran that quick screen/swing play to Mike Wallace. It didn't work from the beginning. I guess it's useful in an offense that struggles to run, but Pittsburgh is not one of those teams.
RashaanSalaami
14 years ago

You make a good point about the Packers being lucky not to have any significant injuries in the secondary during the course of the season. That seems to be the one position group, second only to QB, where injuries will just kill you. We saw that last year. I guess it was fitting, then, that in the final game of the season the Packers lost two of their top three CBs and were able to weather the storm against one of the best QBs in the league.

Like you, I was glad that they kept throwing at Tramon. I'm not sure which play you are referring to when you mention the "pass break-up." I thought you were talking about the fourth and five play, but then you mention the "game-winner," which is definitely the fourth and five play. It was a textbook play, which we've seen from him all year. Wallace complained afterwards that Tramon made contact before the ball arrived, but it didn't look like it to me.

I like what you wrote about the Steelers and Cardinals games last year being important to this year's success. There's a nice symmetry to that. It's sort of like what Raider Pride wrote a few weeks ago about how the loss to the Giants in the NFC championship game led to the QB change that made this year's success possible. The heartbreaking losses don't seem so bad when lessons are learned and the team is ultimately successful.

"Greg C." wrote:



It's really virtually impossible to mask deficiencies in the secondary when you play against good quarterbacks, which was precisely our problem in pass D last year. Our regular season numbers were actually very impressive, but when it came time to defend against the better passing offenses, we struggled. Offenses could spread us thin and complete passes after pinpointing the weakness in our D. This year we excelled in man coverage, specifically in passing off receivers between corners, but also did a better job of disguising zone coverages.

The pass break-up I was referring to (though it may have officially not been scored as such) was the play to the right sideline earlier in the game on Mike Wallace. It was the play where the commentators said that there was only one place to fit the ball and it was at the sidelines. Big Ben threw it directly at Wallace right on time and Tramon essentially broke on the out route exactly with Wallace and got his hand in there to knock it away. Tramon's everything you look for in a corner and his development has been the most exciting part of this season to me. (I'm a bit biased though as you can tell what my favorite part of the game is based on these threads).

Sometimes there's a silver lining to losses that we can't see immediately. Sitting with the Lombardi trophy back in its rightful place, we can now reflect and not feel so badly about prior losses to the Giants, Cardinals, and Steelers, though all of em probably left every Packer fan devastated. They were good learning processes from which we saw the results this season.

One other thing that's somewhat related to that final point, I love how McCarthy learns from his mistakes. He RARELY makes the same mistakes twice. Our team looked frozen in that Championship game and since, our team has practiced more in the cold (even if its in the Hutson Center). He schedules well, gives ample rest to the guys who need it, and accepts input from our players. I can't believe I was so stupid to even think earlier this year that we should begin to consider whether McCarthy's job should be secure at the end of the season.
blank
RashaanSalaami
14 years ago

Awesome seeing Bush getting an INT because I've been defending Bush this season. Wonderful ST player, and the only reason he's defending is because of injuries. So I say blame the injury bug, not Bush.

Two injuries to CBs in one game and we still win. Great job Packers. I'd probably give it to Collins who has a slight edge over Williams with that INT. INTs make a huge difference. They end drives and set things up for the O.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



I would have loved to see the faces of Packers fans across the nation when Bush made that pick. That was absolutely awesome. I was ecstatic and really couldn't stop laughing for a couple minutes. And imagine if he came up with that ball on the final play giving him 2 Super Bowl picks, even if the second would have just been a product of luck and opportunity. ::lol:

I couldn't believe how may times they ran that quick screen/swing play to Mike Wallace. It didn't work from the beginning. I guess it's useful in an offense that struggles to run, but Pittsburgh is not one of those teams.

"TengoJuego" wrote:



That's one of the staples of the Pittsburgh offense though. They have receivers that can block and a pair of tight ends who also excel in that area. On top of that, they have the fastest receiver in the league with elite acceleration and it's no surprise they had it in their game plan. All of our corners have taken after Woodson though. When they see him throwing himself into offensive linemen, you better believe they don't want to be whiffing or shying away from contact on the perimeter when they have to to watch said play with him in the film room.
blank
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago
I can not believe Pitt never threw at Lee. That was amazing.

Greg, I read somewhere that Shields was not in for most of the 2nd half. He badgered the coaches so much they put in him for one series and it was apparent that his injury was preventing him from playing up to his abilities and they did not put him back in after the TD.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
12 years ago
I miss the RashaanSalaami's posts.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
12 years ago

I miss the RashaanSalaami's posts.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I do too. Shoot the guy an email or something.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Fan Shout
dfosterf (9h) : I may have to move
dfosterf (9h) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (16h) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (17h) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (17h) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (18h) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (19h) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (21h) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.
Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb
wpr (9-Apr) : yay
Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland
Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'
Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.
Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.
Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Will there be a tracker on the ball or something?
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : uh oh
Martha Careful (1-Apr) : Too bad camera's can't spot the ball as well.
Mucky Tundra (1-Apr) : So will the chain gang be gone completely or will they still be around as a backup or whatever?
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : The method for measuring first downs in the NFL will switch from chain gangs to camera-based technology in 2025, the league announced.
Martha Careful (1-Apr) : A big step in the right direction. Just put in the college system is very very good.
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : NFL has passed a rule that allows both teams to possess the ball in OT during the regular season
Zero2Cool (1-Apr) : Touchbacks on kickoffs will now bring the ball to the 35-yard line.
beast (31-Mar) : It might of gotten more popular recently, but braiding hair (even men) in certain cultures goes back for centuries.
Martha Careful (30-Mar) : Is men braiding their hair a new style thing? Watching the NCAA men's tournament many players have done
Zero2Cool (29-Mar) : Ha. Well, it'd be nice for folks to reset their own password. Via validated email 😏
beast (29-Mar) : Monopoly was supposed to be an educational game, that show how evil capitalism was and how we should avoid it
beast (29-Mar) : Lol, I was thinking username would be better, as then I wouldn't have to keep an email up to date lol 😂
beast (29-Mar) : Zero2Cool (25-Mar) : I was thinking email because I think it'll make folks keep it up todate lol
wpr (29-Mar) : sure is
Zero2Cool (29-Mar) : Monopoly is a rip off of The Landlord's Game
wpr (27-Mar) : 28 days until the draft
earthquake (27-Mar) : Which seemed strange to my 9 year old self, that you could be a fan for a team other than the one you play for
earthquake (27-Mar) : Nothing eventful happened, other than it being clear that he was a bengals fan
earthquake (27-Mar) : And we went and hung out with him one afternoon, I must have been 9 or so
earthquake (27-Mar) : That’s wild, when I was a kid my friend lived in the same apartment complex in De Pere
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : Only career highspot was a 200 yard rushing game while playing for the Cardinals
Mucky Tundra (27-Mar) : He is a former Packer. Drafted out of Northern Illinois. Didn't do much in GB.
dfosterf (26-Mar) : Despicable
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

8-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

25-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.